Pandeminin Sektörel Maliyetleri: Ticarete Açık Olmanın Rolü Nedir?

IF 0.2 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.26650/istjecon2021-1201055
Cem Çakmaklı, Selva Demiralp, Sevcan Yeşiltaş, M. Yildirim
{"title":"Pandeminin Sektörel Maliyetleri: Ticarete Açık Olmanın Rolü Nedir?","authors":"Cem Çakmaklı, Selva Demiralp, Sevcan Yeşiltaş, M. Yildirim","doi":"10.26650/istjecon2021-1201055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the sectoral costs of the shocks during the pandemic period and analyzes the relationship of these costs with the openness of countries and sectors to trade. We use a model that focuses on the demand and supply side relations at the sectoral level. This model measures the effect of supply and demand-side shocks on the economy by exploiting the economic linkages between countries and their sectors using OECD Intercountry InputOutput tables. We compute supply and demand-side shocks concerning the course of the pandemic, and we consider the effects of these shocks on the sectors. The openness of the countries, or the proportions of exports and imports in the GDP of the countries, was taken into consideration when analyzing these effects. The pandemic's impact on the nation's economies through trade, such as through import and export channels, is bidirectional. When it comes to exports, the economic downturn seen among trading partners during the pandemic era likewise reduces an open country's export potential. From the point of view of imports, the disruptions in production and supply chains during the pandemic period spread to the whole world through supply chains and caused problems in the supply of imported inputs. In this context, the results obtained in this article show that open countries have experienced heavier economic losses during the pandemic period. This result is consistent with the fact that open countries are more exposed to demand contraction and supply chain problems due to the pandemic. This finding is demonstrated by considering Turkey and Brazil as two examples, which have different openness structures. When we compare the costs of the pandemic period between Turkey, which is an emerging market with a high openness to trade, and Brazil, which is a relatively closed economy, it is seen that the costs computed for Turkey are higher. When we focus on the results in more detail, we observe that the sectoral costs are widespread in Turkey due to supply problems, and losses in sectors such as real estate, construction, and manufacturing, which have a high dependence on imported intermediate goods in their production, are higher than in Brazil. When we compare the US and the Netherlands, two developed countries, we find that the Netherlands, with its high level of openness, has higher costs.","PeriodicalId":33072,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/istjecon2021-1201055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the sectoral costs of the shocks during the pandemic period and analyzes the relationship of these costs with the openness of countries and sectors to trade. We use a model that focuses on the demand and supply side relations at the sectoral level. This model measures the effect of supply and demand-side shocks on the economy by exploiting the economic linkages between countries and their sectors using OECD Intercountry InputOutput tables. We compute supply and demand-side shocks concerning the course of the pandemic, and we consider the effects of these shocks on the sectors. The openness of the countries, or the proportions of exports and imports in the GDP of the countries, was taken into consideration when analyzing these effects. The pandemic's impact on the nation's economies through trade, such as through import and export channels, is bidirectional. When it comes to exports, the economic downturn seen among trading partners during the pandemic era likewise reduces an open country's export potential. From the point of view of imports, the disruptions in production and supply chains during the pandemic period spread to the whole world through supply chains and caused problems in the supply of imported inputs. In this context, the results obtained in this article show that open countries have experienced heavier economic losses during the pandemic period. This result is consistent with the fact that open countries are more exposed to demand contraction and supply chain problems due to the pandemic. This finding is demonstrated by considering Turkey and Brazil as two examples, which have different openness structures. When we compare the costs of the pandemic period between Turkey, which is an emerging market with a high openness to trade, and Brazil, which is a relatively closed economy, it is seen that the costs computed for Turkey are higher. When we focus on the results in more detail, we observe that the sectoral costs are widespread in Turkey due to supply problems, and losses in sectors such as real estate, construction, and manufacturing, which have a high dependence on imported intermediate goods in their production, are higher than in Brazil. When we compare the US and the Netherlands, two developed countries, we find that the Netherlands, with its high level of openness, has higher costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病部门信息:开放贸易的作用是什么?
本研究调查了大流行期间冲击的部门成本,并分析了这些成本与国家和部门的贸易开放程度之间的关系。我们使用的模型侧重于部门层面的需求侧和供给侧关系。该模型利用经合组织国家间投入产出表,利用各国及其部门之间的经济联系,衡量供给侧和需求侧冲击对经济的影响。我们计算了与大流行过程有关的供给和需求方面的冲击,并考虑了这些冲击对各部门的影响。在分析这些影响时,考虑了这些国家的开放程度,或出口和进口占国内生产总值的比例。疫情通过进出口等贸易渠道对国家经济的影响是双向的。在出口方面,大流行时期贸易伙伴之间的经济衰退同样降低了开放国家的出口潜力。从进口来看,疫情期间生产和供应链的中断通过供应链向全球扩散,导致进口投入品供应出现问题。在此背景下,本文获得的结果表明,开放国家在大流行期间遭受了更大的经济损失。这一结果与开放国家更容易受到大流行造成的需求萎缩和供应链问题的影响这一事实相一致。这一发现通过考虑土耳其和巴西两个具有不同开放结构的例子来证明。当我们比较大流行期间的成本时,土耳其是一个对贸易高度开放的新兴市场,而巴西是一个相对封闭的经济体,可以看到土耳其的成本计算更高。当我们更详细地关注结果时,我们观察到,由于供应问题,土耳其的部门成本普遍存在,房地产、建筑和制造业等部门的损失比巴西高,这些部门在生产中高度依赖进口中间产品。当我们比较美国和荷兰这两个发达国家时,我们发现开放程度高的荷兰的成本更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historicizing National Socialism and Mehmet Genç Kripto Paraların Volatilite Dinamiklerinin ve Spekülatif Balon Varlığının Analizi: Bitcoin, Ethereum ve Ripple Örneği Sermaye Sahipliği ve Mülkiyetin Tabana Yayılmasının İktisadi Gelir Dağılımına Etkisi* BIST100 Bankacılık Sektöründeki Bağımlılığın Asma Kopula ile İncelenmesi What Determined Stock Returns in Turkey from 1990 to 2022: Evidence from Structural Break Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1