Errata: Measuring Disease Severity in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

Melinda F. Davis, K. Scherer, T. Miller, F. Meaney
{"title":"Errata: Measuring Disease Severity in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy","authors":"Melinda F. Davis, K. Scherer, T. Miller, F. Meaney","doi":"10.2458/V1I2.12366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical investigations use a wide variety of outcome indicators that are often not comparable. It can be challenging to integrate results across multiple studies that do not share a common metric. Some conditions such as Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy have a predictable course of disease progression. Severity can be inferred from a patient's medical history. This paper describes the development of a disease severity measure using common markers of disease progression. Rasch modeling was used to estimate severity using dichotomous events that indicate disease progression. Caregivers of 34 young men with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy completed structured interviews about their care and medical history. Interview questions included surgeries (tendon release, scoliosis, tracheostomy), respiratory equipment (assisted ventilation, cough assist devices), and the use of other medical equipment (e.g., braces, walkers, wheelchairs, transfer boards, hospital beds). The resulting measure had a reliability of .83. The correlation between the severity measure and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) was .68. Preliminary results and item calibrations are provided for the severity measure that can be estimated from caregiver reports or administrative data. DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v1i1_davis","PeriodicalId":90602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"8-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/V1I2.12366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Medical investigations use a wide variety of outcome indicators that are often not comparable. It can be challenging to integrate results across multiple studies that do not share a common metric. Some conditions such as Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy have a predictable course of disease progression. Severity can be inferred from a patient's medical history. This paper describes the development of a disease severity measure using common markers of disease progression. Rasch modeling was used to estimate severity using dichotomous events that indicate disease progression. Caregivers of 34 young men with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy completed structured interviews about their care and medical history. Interview questions included surgeries (tendon release, scoliosis, tracheostomy), respiratory equipment (assisted ventilation, cough assist devices), and the use of other medical equipment (e.g., braces, walkers, wheelchairs, transfer boards, hospital beds). The resulting measure had a reliability of .83. The correlation between the severity measure and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) was .68. Preliminary results and item calibrations are provided for the severity measure that can be estimated from caregiver reports or administrative data. DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v1i1_davis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
勘误:测量Duchenne和Becker肌营养不良症的疾病严重程度
医学调查使用各种各样的结果指标,往往不具有可比性。整合多个研究的结果可能具有挑战性,因为这些研究没有共享一个共同的指标。一些疾病如杜氏肌萎缩症和贝克尔肌萎缩症有一个可预测的病程。严重程度可从患者的病史推断。本文描述了一种疾病严重程度测量的发展,使用疾病进展的共同标记。Rasch模型使用指示疾病进展的二分类事件来估计严重程度。34名患有杜氏肌萎缩症或贝克尔肌萎缩症的年轻男性的护理人员完成了关于他们的护理和病史的结构化访谈。访谈问题包括手术(肌腱松解、脊柱侧凸、气管造口术)、呼吸设备(辅助通气、咳嗽辅助装置)以及其他医疗设备(如支架、助行器、轮椅、转移板、医院病床)的使用。测量结果的信度为0.83。严重程度测量与肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评定量表(ALSFRS)的相关性为0.68。初步结果和项目校准提供了严重性措施,可以从护理人员报告或管理数据估计。DOI: 10.2458 / azu_jmmss_v1i1_davis
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Invitation for COVID-19 Submissions Machine Learning Method for High-Dimensional Education Data Comparing human coding to two natural language processing algorithms in aspirations of people affected by Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy The Modern Biased Information Test: Proposing alternatives for implicit measures Binary Classification: An Introductory Machine Learning Tutorial for Social Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1