A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques

E. Blair
{"title":"A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques","authors":"E. Blair","doi":"10.2458/V6I1.18772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an attempt to help find meaning within qualitative data, researchers commonly start by coding their data. There are a number of coding systems available to researchers and this reflexive account explores my reflections on the use of two such techniques. As part of a larger investigation, two pilot studies were undertaken as a means to examine the relative merits of open coding and template coding for examining transcripts. This article does not describe the research project per se but attempts to step back and offer a reflexive account of the development of data coding tools. Here I reflect upon and evaluate the two data coding techniques that were piloted, and discuss how using appropriate aspects of both led to the development of my final data coding approach. My exploration found there was no clear-cut ‘best’ option but that the data coding techniques needed to be reflexively-aligned to meet the specific needs of my project. This reflection suggests that, when coding qualitative data, researchers should be methodologically thoughtful when they attempt to apply any data coding technique; that they do not assume pre-established tools are aligned to their particular paradigm; and that they consider combining and refining established techniques as a means to define their own specific codes. DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v6i1_blair","PeriodicalId":90602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"14-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2458/V6I1.18772","citationCount":"309","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of methods and measurement in the social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/V6I1.18772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 309

Abstract

In an attempt to help find meaning within qualitative data, researchers commonly start by coding their data. There are a number of coding systems available to researchers and this reflexive account explores my reflections on the use of two such techniques. As part of a larger investigation, two pilot studies were undertaken as a means to examine the relative merits of open coding and template coding for examining transcripts. This article does not describe the research project per se but attempts to step back and offer a reflexive account of the development of data coding tools. Here I reflect upon and evaluate the two data coding techniques that were piloted, and discuss how using appropriate aspects of both led to the development of my final data coding approach. My exploration found there was no clear-cut ‘best’ option but that the data coding techniques needed to be reflexively-aligned to meet the specific needs of my project. This reflection suggests that, when coding qualitative data, researchers should be methodologically thoughtful when they attempt to apply any data coding technique; that they do not assume pre-established tools are aligned to their particular paradigm; and that they consider combining and refining established techniques as a means to define their own specific codes. DOI:10.2458/azu_jmmss_v6i1_blair
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种定性数据编码技术的反思性探索
为了帮助在定性数据中找到意义,研究人员通常从对数据进行编码开始。有许多编码系统可供研究人员使用,这篇反思性的文章探讨了我对使用这两种技术的思考。作为更大调查的一部分,进行了两项试点研究,作为检查开放编码和模板编码用于检查转录本的相对优点的一种手段。本文不描述研究项目本身,但试图退后一步,并提供数据编码工具的发展反思的帐户。在这里,我回顾并评估了这两种已试用的数据编码技术,并讨论了如何使用这两种技术的适当方面来开发我的最终数据编码方法。我的探索发现没有明确的“最佳”选择,但数据编码技术需要与条件反射一致,以满足我项目的特定需求。这一反思表明,当编码定性数据时,研究人员在尝试应用任何数据编码技术时都应该在方法上进行思考;他们不假设预先建立的工具与他们特定的范例是一致的;他们考虑结合和改进现有的技术,作为定义自己特定代码的一种手段。DOI: 10.2458 / azu_jmmss_v6i1_blair
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Invitation for COVID-19 Submissions Machine Learning Method for High-Dimensional Education Data Comparing human coding to two natural language processing algorithms in aspirations of people affected by Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy The Modern Biased Information Test: Proposing alternatives for implicit measures Binary Classification: An Introductory Machine Learning Tutorial for Social Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1