Voluntary childlessness and social policy: an alternative view.

J. Veevers
{"title":"Voluntary childlessness and social policy: an alternative view.","authors":"J. Veevers","doi":"10.2307/583116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the last 10 years childlessness in North America has increased. This has been particularly the case among women under 30. Voluntary childlessness should be recognized as a viable alternative to conventional family life, particularly for couples who become parents only as a result of pronatalist pressures. Respected and legitimate childlessness may actually be a desirable life adjustment for individuals confronted with a worsening of the employment situation, a deterioration of their marital relationship, and an intensification of emotional and mental stress as a result of having children. Rather than simply supporting existing pronatalist views, counselors and physicians should be supportive of couples who have consciously chosen to remain childless. Control of fertility should be the right of the individual and should not be under the unlateral control of frequently biased physicians. Contraception and abortion should be available to all and not be subject to marital or parental status. It is also mandatory that there be recognition of the legal right to sterilization of individuals of legal age and with sufficient understanding of the consequences.\n","PeriodicalId":84728,"journal":{"name":"Family planning resume","volume":"1 1 1","pages":"254-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/583116","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning resume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/583116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In the last 10 years childlessness in North America has increased. This has been particularly the case among women under 30. Voluntary childlessness should be recognized as a viable alternative to conventional family life, particularly for couples who become parents only as a result of pronatalist pressures. Respected and legitimate childlessness may actually be a desirable life adjustment for individuals confronted with a worsening of the employment situation, a deterioration of their marital relationship, and an intensification of emotional and mental stress as a result of having children. Rather than simply supporting existing pronatalist views, counselors and physicians should be supportive of couples who have consciously chosen to remain childless. Control of fertility should be the right of the individual and should not be under the unlateral control of frequently biased physicians. Contraception and abortion should be available to all and not be subject to marital or parental status. It is also mandatory that there be recognition of the legal right to sterilization of individuals of legal age and with sufficient understanding of the consequences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自愿不生育与社会政策:另一种观点。
在过去的10年里,北美的无子女人数有所增加。在30岁以下的女性中尤其如此。应当承认自愿不生育是替代传统家庭生活的一种可行办法,特别是对于那些仅仅由于生育压力才成为父母的夫妇。对于面临就业状况恶化、婚姻关系恶化以及因生育子女而加剧的情绪和精神压力的个人来说,受尊重和合法的无子女实际上可能是一种理想的生活调整。咨询师和医生不应该简单地支持现有的生育论者的观点,而应该支持那些有意识地选择不要孩子的夫妇。控制生育应该是个人的权利,不应该由经常有偏见的医生单方面控制。避孕和堕胎应向所有人提供,而不受婚姻或父母状况的限制。还必须承认达到法定年龄的人有绝育的合法权利,并充分了解其后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nonclinical family planning programs. A communication experiment to increase the demand for voluntary surgical contraception in El Salvador. Predictors of family planning approval and adoption. Population policies and cultural values: a Mexican editorial. Implications of recent fertility trends in less developed countries for world population projections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1