Antibiotic Susceptibility and Differential expression of virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Applied Environmental Biotechnology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.26789/aeb.2022.01.002
Mohammad A. Alkafaween, Mohammad Abu-Sini, Hamid A. Nagi Al-Jamal
{"title":"Antibiotic Susceptibility and Differential expression of virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus","authors":"Mohammad A. Alkafaween, Mohammad Abu-Sini, Hamid A. Nagi Al-Jamal","doi":"10.26789/aeb.2022.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common pathogens in biofilm-associated chronic infections. S. aureus that live within biofilms avoid the host's immune response and are more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic bacteria. The current study was conducted to evaluate the antibacterial, antibiofilm and antivirulence of seven antibiotics (Ciprofloxacin (CP), Gentamicin (GEN), Tetracycline (TET), Amikacin (AMK), Clindamycin (CLI), Erythromycin (Ery) and Vancomycin (VAN) against S. aureus. The effects of seven antibiotics (CP, AMK, VAN, TET GEN, Ery and CLI) on S. aureus planktonic and biofilm were determined via Antibiotic susceptibility test, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), disruption of microcolony, biofilm inhibition and degradation (crystal violet staining) and RT-qPCR. Antibiotic susceptibility test showed that CP, AMK, VAN, TET GEN, Ery and CLI has antibacterial activity against S. aureus with an inhibition zone of 28 mm, 21 mm, 27 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 27 mm and 19 mm respectively. The results showed that CP and AMK possessed the lowest MIC value against S. aureus with 0.125 µg/mL and 0.25 µg/mL for VAN, TET and GEN and 1.0 for Ery and CLI. The recorded values for MBCs were 0.25 μg for CP and AMK for S. aureus, 0.5 μg for vancomycin, tetracycline and gentamicin for S. aureus and 1.0 μg for Ery and CLI for S. aureus. Notably, CP and AMK demonstrated considerable efficacy, as shown by the low values for MIC; 0.125 μg and MBC; 0.25 μg for S. aureus. All antibiotics were found to disrupt microcolony formation in S. aureus at MIC of each antibiotics. At 0.25 μg concentration to 8 μg concentration of each antibiotic were significantly found to degrade and inhibit biofilm formation of S. aureus. The RT-qPCR showed that four genes including argF, purC, adh, and fabG were downregulated, whilst, three genes including scdA, pykA and menB were upregulated after exposure to CP, AMK, VAN, TET GEN, Ery and CLI. This study showed the efficacy of seven antibiotics against planktonic, biofilm, gene expression and that different concentrations of antibiotics have different degrees of potential effect on established biofilm. In addition, a decreased expression of virulence genes in S. aureus will impact their pathogenicity. These results provide the theoretical parameters for the selection of effective antimicrobial in clinical therapy and demonstrate how to correctly use antibiotics at MIC and sub-MIC as preventive drugs.","PeriodicalId":36987,"journal":{"name":"Applied Environmental Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Environmental Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26789/aeb.2022.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common pathogens in biofilm-associated chronic infections. S. aureus that live within biofilms avoid the host's immune response and are more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic bacteria. The current study was conducted to evaluate the antibacterial, antibiofilm and antivirulence of seven antibiotics (Ciprofloxacin (CP), Gentamicin (GEN), Tetracycline (TET), Amikacin (AMK), Clindamycin (CLI), Erythromycin (Ery) and Vancomycin (VAN) against S. aureus. The effects of seven antibiotics (CP, AMK, VAN, TET GEN, Ery and CLI) on S. aureus planktonic and biofilm were determined via Antibiotic susceptibility test, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), disruption of microcolony, biofilm inhibition and degradation (crystal violet staining) and RT-qPCR. Antibiotic susceptibility test showed that CP, AMK, VAN, TET GEN, Ery and CLI has antibacterial activity against S. aureus with an inhibition zone of 28 mm, 21 mm, 27 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 27 mm and 19 mm respectively. The results showed that CP and AMK possessed the lowest MIC value against S. aureus with 0.125 µg/mL and 0.25 µg/mL for VAN, TET and GEN and 1.0 for Ery and CLI. The recorded values for MBCs were 0.25 μg for CP and AMK for S. aureus, 0.5 μg for vancomycin, tetracycline and gentamicin for S. aureus and 1.0 μg for Ery and CLI for S. aureus. Notably, CP and AMK demonstrated considerable efficacy, as shown by the low values for MIC; 0.125 μg and MBC; 0.25 μg for S. aureus. All antibiotics were found to disrupt microcolony formation in S. aureus at MIC of each antibiotics. At 0.25 μg concentration to 8 μg concentration of each antibiotic were significantly found to degrade and inhibit biofilm formation of S. aureus. The RT-qPCR showed that four genes including argF, purC, adh, and fabG were downregulated, whilst, three genes including scdA, pykA and menB were upregulated after exposure to CP, AMK, VAN, TET GEN, Ery and CLI. This study showed the efficacy of seven antibiotics against planktonic, biofilm, gene expression and that different concentrations of antibiotics have different degrees of potential effect on established biofilm. In addition, a decreased expression of virulence genes in S. aureus will impact their pathogenicity. These results provide the theoretical parameters for the selection of effective antimicrobial in clinical therapy and demonstrate how to correctly use antibiotics at MIC and sub-MIC as preventive drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生素敏感性及毒力基因的差异表达
金黄色葡萄球菌是生物膜相关慢性感染中最常见的病原体之一。生活在生物膜内的金黄色葡萄球菌避免了宿主的免疫反应,并且比浮游细菌更耐抗生素。本研究评价了环丙沙星(CP)、庆大霉素(GEN)、四环素(TET)、阿米卡星(AMK)、克林霉素(CLI)、红霉素(Ery)和万古霉素(VAN) 7种抗生素对金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌、抗菌膜和抗毒力。通过药敏试验、最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、最低杀菌浓度(MBC)、微菌落破坏、生物膜抑制降解(结晶紫染色)和RT-qPCR检测7种抗生素(CP、AMK、VAN、TET GEN、Ery和CLI)对金黄色葡萄球菌浮游生物和生物膜的影响。药敏试验表明,CP、AMK、VAN、TET GEN、Ery和CLI对金黄色葡萄球菌均有抑菌活性,抑菌范围分别为28 mm、21 mm、27 mm、20 mm、25 mm、27 mm和19 mm。结果表明,CP和AMK对金黄色葡萄球菌的MIC值最低,分别为0.125µg/mL和0.25µg/mL,对VAN、TET和GEN的MIC值为1.0µg/mL。金黄色葡萄球菌的MBCs记录值为CP和AMK 0.25 μg,金黄色葡萄球菌的万古霉素、四环素和庆大霉素0.5 μg,金黄色葡萄球菌的Ery和CLI 1.0 μg。值得注意的是,CP和AMK表现出相当大的疗效,MIC值较低;0.125 μg和MBC;金黄色葡萄球菌0.25 μg。所有抗生素均能破坏金黄色葡萄球菌微菌落的形成。在0.25 ~ 8 μg浓度下,各抗生素对金黄色葡萄球菌的生物膜形成均有显著的降解和抑制作用。RT-qPCR结果显示,CP、AMK、VAN、TET GEN、Ery和CLI暴露后,argF、purC、adh和fabG 4个基因下调,scdA、pykA和menB 3个基因上调。本研究显示了7种抗生素对浮游生物、生物膜、基因表达的影响,不同浓度的抗生素对已建立的生物膜有不同程度的潜在影响。此外,金黄色葡萄球菌毒力基因表达的减少也会影响其致病性。这些结果为临床治疗中有效抗菌药物的选择提供了理论参数,并为如何正确使用MIC和亚MIC抗生素作为预防药物提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Environmental Biotechnology
Applied Environmental Biotechnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
The effect of Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) as a microbial diatory feed supplement for juvenile of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Micro- and nano-plastics in hydroponic environment are critical for plants: A meta-analysis Popularization or Population of Science and the Future Recycling of biogas wastewater to organic fertilizers and influence of organic fertilizers on maize, mung bean growth and yield under the field conditions A Comparative Study of Antibacterial Activity of Citrus and Jabali Honeys with Manuka Honey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1