Effizient und partizipativ?

Q3 Social Sciences Geographische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.25162/GZ-2019-0006
L. Gailing, M. Naumann
{"title":"Effizient und partizipativ?","authors":"L. Gailing, M. Naumann","doi":"10.25162/GZ-2019-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses potentials and risks of the focus group as a method of human geography. Firstly, we aim to clarify the extent to which focus groups are suitable for efficiently opening up new fields of analysis. Secondly, it is to be determined whether the method of the focus group will involve the participants more closely in the research processes. Thirdly, we analyze the specific “geographic” aspects of focus groups. The basis of our contribution is, on the one hand, a review of the socio-scientific and human-geographic literature on focus groups and on the other hand the critical analysis of our experiences with the implementation of focus groups in two research projects in the field of energy geography. The paper concludes that the focus group is a demanding method which - unlike often postulated - is not per se characterized by a particular efficiency and participation. Its particular advantages are, in contrast, to combine context-related experiences and information in the form of a guided group discussion. Geographical realities (territories, places, scales and networks) are produced and reproduced with regard to their actor constellations and power relations.","PeriodicalId":35646,"journal":{"name":"Geographische Zeitschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/GZ-2019-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses potentials and risks of the focus group as a method of human geography. Firstly, we aim to clarify the extent to which focus groups are suitable for efficiently opening up new fields of analysis. Secondly, it is to be determined whether the method of the focus group will involve the participants more closely in the research processes. Thirdly, we analyze the specific “geographic” aspects of focus groups. The basis of our contribution is, on the one hand, a review of the socio-scientific and human-geographic literature on focus groups and on the other hand the critical analysis of our experiences with the implementation of focus groups in two research projects in the field of energy geography. The paper concludes that the focus group is a demanding method which - unlike often postulated - is not per se characterized by a particular efficiency and participation. Its particular advantages are, in contrast, to combine context-related experiences and information in the form of a guided group discussion. Geographical realities (territories, places, scales and networks) are produced and reproduced with regard to their actor constellations and power relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效率及参与性呢?
本文讨论了焦点小组作为人文地理学研究方法的潜力和风险。首先,我们的目标是澄清焦点小组在多大程度上适合于有效地开辟新的分析领域。其次,需要确定焦点小组的方法是否会使参与者更密切地参与研究过程。第三,我们分析了焦点小组的具体“地理”方面。我们的贡献的基础,一方面是对焦点小组的社会科学和人文地理学文献的回顾,另一方面是对我们在能源地理学领域的两个研究项目中实施焦点小组的经验进行批判性分析。本文的结论是,焦点小组是一种要求很高的方法,与通常假定的不同,它本身并没有特别的效率和参与。相比之下,它的特殊优点是将与上下文相关的经验和信息以引导小组讨论的形式结合起来。地理现实(领土、地点、规模和网络)是根据行动者星座和权力关系产生和复制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geographische Zeitschrift
Geographische Zeitschrift Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Die Geographische Zeitschrift gehört seit ihrem Beginn im Jahr 1895 zu den führenden deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften ihres Faches. Heute widmet sich die Zeitschrift in meist deutschsprachigen aber auch englischen Beiträgen den Gegenwartsfragen der Anthropogeographie. Als international renommiertes Fachmedium ist sie einem hohen theoretischen und methodischen Anspruch verpflichtet. Die Qualität und Aktualität der Beiträge wird durch internationale Sachverständige — als "refereed journal" — garantiert. Gerade indem sie die traditionellen Grenzen ihres Faches überschreitet, trägt die Geographische Zeitschrift maßgeblich zur Weiterentwicklung und Fortschritt der Anthropogeographie bei.
期刊最新文献
Aus der Perspektive der Migration Lateinamerikanische Geographien Territorium und Multiterritorialität in dekolonialer Perspektive Körper, Raum und Territorium in Lateinamerika Die Politische Ökologie Lateinamerikas im Dialog mit der Geographie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1