R v. Tait.

Criminal Division
{"title":"R v. Tait.","authors":"Criminal Division","doi":"10.25291/vr/1973-vr-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stephen Tait and a friend had gone to Colin McIntyre's house to frighten him. McIntyre's two daughters were home, and the elder, Wendy, was pregnant. McIntyre was not home, so Tait and his friend stole some property and then threatened Wendy and her sister not to tell the police, or they would all be hurt, including Wendy's \"baby.\" The men were arrested, charged, and convicted of threatening to kill Wendy, her sister, and Wendy's baby. Tait appealed the conviction for threatening to kill the baby on grounds that the baby was still unborn. The Court of Appeal quashed the conviction, arguing that because the fetus in utero was not, in the ordinary sense, another person distinct from its mother, Tait's threat to kill it was not a distinct offense.\n","PeriodicalId":82910,"journal":{"name":"The all England law reports","volume":"[1989] 3 1","pages":"682-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The all England law reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25291/vr/1973-vr-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stephen Tait and a friend had gone to Colin McIntyre's house to frighten him. McIntyre's two daughters were home, and the elder, Wendy, was pregnant. McIntyre was not home, so Tait and his friend stole some property and then threatened Wendy and her sister not to tell the police, or they would all be hurt, including Wendy's "baby." The men were arrested, charged, and convicted of threatening to kill Wendy, her sister, and Wendy's baby. Tait appealed the conviction for threatening to kill the baby on grounds that the baby was still unborn. The Court of Appeal quashed the conviction, arguing that because the fetus in utero was not, in the ordinary sense, another person distinct from its mother, Tait's threat to kill it was not a distinct offense.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R v.泰特。
斯蒂芬·泰特和一个朋友去科林·麦金太尔家吓唬他。麦金太尔的两个女儿都在家,大女儿温迪怀孕了。麦金太尔不在家,所以泰特和他的朋友偷了一些东西,然后威胁温蒂和她的妹妹不要告诉警察,否则他们都会受到伤害,包括温蒂的“孩子”。这些人被逮捕、起诉,并因威胁要杀死温迪、她的妹妹和温迪的孩子而被定罪。泰特以婴儿尚未出生为由,对威胁杀死婴儿的罪名提出上诉。上诉法院撤销了这一判决,认为由于子宫内的胎儿在一般意义上并不是与其母亲不同的另一个人,因此泰特威胁要杀死胎儿并不构成明显的犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Evans v. Amicus Healthcare Ltd; Hadley v. Midland Fertility Ltd. Re R (a Child). R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1