{"title":"The Crisis After the Crisis Resilience or Reset?","authors":"Ioan-Franc Valeriu, Andrei-Marius Diamescu","doi":"10.24818/ea/2021/58/864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of the crisis after the crisis recently introduced in the academic debate refers to the fact that, since the outbreak of the health crisis generated by SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic has had a major impact on all economic, social, political and cultural activities of the daily life, influencing significantly the global development. However, the sanitary crisis has induced a multiple faceted crisis, with a number of implications whose consequences are to impact on the further development of the human society as a whole. Treated at first with a certain degree of relaxation, considering the stage we were facing at the time, when both the scientific community and the decision-making actors of the responsible organizations in the field were focusing on the management of the situation, unprecedented at such a scale, on identifying the protocols and action strategies, respectively on implementing recommendations for governments, companies and population, the crisis after the crisis would really capture the researchers attention in the second part of the last year. On the occasion of the Penser l'Europe International Academic Seminar of the Romanian Academy in October 2020, the phrase was retained internationally by two famous economists, honorary members of the Romanian Academy: Jaime Gil Aluja, the president of the Spanish Royal Academy of Economic and Financial Sciences, and Thierry de Montbrial, member of the French Academy of Moral and Political Sciences. The debate that took place on this occasion, obviously \"energized\" by the already visible social, cultural, economic and sanitary effects, as well as the major impact of the pandemic over the national and international macroeconomic indicators, extended significantly the field of thought regarding the \"cascading\" consequences both of the infections and of the measures to limit and especially to combat the spread of the virus, justifying once more the necessity to quickly identify globally viable solutions adjusted to each national economic and epidemiological bivectorial context to facilitate the return to a normal life as soon as possible.","PeriodicalId":46837,"journal":{"name":"Amfiteatru Economic","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amfiteatru Economic","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2021/58/864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of the crisis after the crisis recently introduced in the academic debate refers to the fact that, since the outbreak of the health crisis generated by SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic has had a major impact on all economic, social, political and cultural activities of the daily life, influencing significantly the global development. However, the sanitary crisis has induced a multiple faceted crisis, with a number of implications whose consequences are to impact on the further development of the human society as a whole. Treated at first with a certain degree of relaxation, considering the stage we were facing at the time, when both the scientific community and the decision-making actors of the responsible organizations in the field were focusing on the management of the situation, unprecedented at such a scale, on identifying the protocols and action strategies, respectively on implementing recommendations for governments, companies and population, the crisis after the crisis would really capture the researchers attention in the second part of the last year. On the occasion of the Penser l'Europe International Academic Seminar of the Romanian Academy in October 2020, the phrase was retained internationally by two famous economists, honorary members of the Romanian Academy: Jaime Gil Aluja, the president of the Spanish Royal Academy of Economic and Financial Sciences, and Thierry de Montbrial, member of the French Academy of Moral and Political Sciences. The debate that took place on this occasion, obviously "energized" by the already visible social, cultural, economic and sanitary effects, as well as the major impact of the pandemic over the national and international macroeconomic indicators, extended significantly the field of thought regarding the "cascading" consequences both of the infections and of the measures to limit and especially to combat the spread of the virus, justifying once more the necessity to quickly identify globally viable solutions adjusted to each national economic and epidemiological bivectorial context to facilitate the return to a normal life as soon as possible.
最近在学术辩论中提出的危机后危机的概念是指,自SARS-CoV-2引发的健康危机爆发以来,疫情对日常生活的所有经济、社会、政治和文化活动产生了重大影响,对全球发展产生了重大影响。然而,卫生危机引发了多方面的危机,其后果将影响整个人类社会的进一步发展。考虑到我们当时所处的阶段,当时科学界和该领域负责组织的决策行为者都在集中注意管理空前规模的局势,集中注意确定议定书和行动战略,分别集中注意执行向政府、公司和人民提出的建议,因此,起初给予一定程度的放松对待,危机之后的危机在去年下半年真正引起了研究者的注意。在2020年10月罗马尼亚科学院“彭瑟·欧”国际学术研讨会上,这句话被两位著名经济学家、罗马尼亚科学院荣誉院士——西班牙皇家经济与金融科学院院长Jaime Gil Aluja和法国道德与政治科学院院士Thierry de Montbrial——在国际上保留下来。在这一场合进行的辩论显然是由于已经可见的社会、文化、经济和卫生影响,以及这一流行病对国家和国际宏观经济指标的重大影响而"激发"起来的,它大大扩展了关于感染和限制特别是防止该病毒传播的措施的"连锁"后果的思想领域。再次证明有必要根据每个国家的经济和流行病学双媒介情况迅速确定全球可行的解决办法,以促进尽快恢复正常生活。