Factors Influencing Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) Reproductive Success on a Mixed Use Beach in Florida

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Chelonian Conservation and Biology Pub Date : 2016-12-30 DOI:10.2744/CCB-1206.1
Rebekah J Lindborg, Emily Neidhardt, B. Witherington, J. R. Smith, A. Savage
{"title":"Factors Influencing Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) Reproductive Success on a Mixed Use Beach in Florida","authors":"Rebekah J Lindborg, Emily Neidhardt, B. Witherington, J. R. Smith, A. Savage","doi":"10.2744/CCB-1206.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although estimates of sea turtle reproductive success are important to quantify population status and effects from threats, published representative values of these rates are rare. Most assessments involving hatching success have taken place as part of experimental analyses that did not spatiotemporally represent a population. To fill this gap, we analyzed an 11-yr time series (2004–2014) of sea turtle hatching and emergence success data for a 7-km stretch of Florida beach backed by mixed suburban and resort/recreational land use. Our analysis examined potential egg-mortality factors associated with the incubation of these nests. The data set included representative sampling of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) nests (n = 2,543, 34.4% of all nests made during the period) and green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nests (n = 972, 44.7% of all nests). Mean (± SD) annual hatching success was 68.6% ± 35.5% for loggerheads and 59.6% ±  39.5% for green turtles, and mean emergence success was 66.6% ± 35.7% for loggerheads and 57.0% ± 39.1% for green turtles. Mammalian predation rates had little effect on overall hatching success trends on our study beach with the sample of predation events (0.3% over 11 yrs) too small to analyze. There were significant effects from tropical storms and hurricanes on hatching success trends throughout the study period, based on negative correlations between hatching success for each species and highest wave height incurred during incubation, mean wave height during incubation, and the number of days that study nests incurred 2 m or higher waves. Hatching and emergence success for each species were lowest during tropical cyclones, which corresponded with an increased number of complete nest wash-outs. Nests within our study site had higher hatching and emergence success rates compared with loggerhead and green turtle nests at other Florida beaches. These assessments of reproductive success are part of a conservation program undertaken at an actively used resort beach, with conservation actions that included vigilance for nest mortality factors and outreach to beachgoers with the aim to promote conscientious behavior during the sea turtle nesting season.","PeriodicalId":50703,"journal":{"name":"Chelonian Conservation and Biology","volume":"15 1","pages":"238 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2744/CCB-1206.1","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chelonian Conservation and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-1206.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Abstract Although estimates of sea turtle reproductive success are important to quantify population status and effects from threats, published representative values of these rates are rare. Most assessments involving hatching success have taken place as part of experimental analyses that did not spatiotemporally represent a population. To fill this gap, we analyzed an 11-yr time series (2004–2014) of sea turtle hatching and emergence success data for a 7-km stretch of Florida beach backed by mixed suburban and resort/recreational land use. Our analysis examined potential egg-mortality factors associated with the incubation of these nests. The data set included representative sampling of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) nests (n = 2,543, 34.4% of all nests made during the period) and green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nests (n = 972, 44.7% of all nests). Mean (± SD) annual hatching success was 68.6% ± 35.5% for loggerheads and 59.6% ±  39.5% for green turtles, and mean emergence success was 66.6% ± 35.7% for loggerheads and 57.0% ± 39.1% for green turtles. Mammalian predation rates had little effect on overall hatching success trends on our study beach with the sample of predation events (0.3% over 11 yrs) too small to analyze. There were significant effects from tropical storms and hurricanes on hatching success trends throughout the study period, based on negative correlations between hatching success for each species and highest wave height incurred during incubation, mean wave height during incubation, and the number of days that study nests incurred 2 m or higher waves. Hatching and emergence success for each species were lowest during tropical cyclones, which corresponded with an increased number of complete nest wash-outs. Nests within our study site had higher hatching and emergence success rates compared with loggerhead and green turtle nests at other Florida beaches. These assessments of reproductive success are part of a conservation program undertaken at an actively used resort beach, with conservation actions that included vigilance for nest mortality factors and outreach to beachgoers with the aim to promote conscientious behavior during the sea turtle nesting season.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佛罗里达混合用途海滩上影响红海龟和绿海龟繁殖成功的因素
虽然海龟繁殖成功率的估计对于量化种群状况和威胁的影响很重要,但发表的这些比率的代表性值很少。大多数关于孵化成功的评估都是作为实验分析的一部分进行的,这些分析在时空上并不代表一个种群。为了填补这一空白,我们分析了11年时间序列(2004-2014)的海龟孵化和出现成功数据,这些数据来自佛罗里达州7公里长的海滩,由混合郊区和度假/娱乐用地支持。我们的分析检查了与这些巢穴孵化相关的潜在蛋死亡因素。数据集包括有代表性的红海龟(Caretta Caretta)巢(n = 2543,占同期所有巢的34.4%)和绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)巢(n = 972,占所有巢的44.7%)。红海龟年平均孵化成功率为68.6%±35.5%,绿海龟年平均孵化成功率为59.6%±39.5%,红海龟年平均孵化成功率为66.6%±35.7%,绿海龟年平均孵化成功率为57.0%±39.1%。在我们的研究海滩上,哺乳动物的捕食率对整体孵化成功趋势的影响很小,因为捕食事件的样本(11年的0.3%)太小而无法分析。在整个研究期间,热带风暴和飓风对孵化成功率趋势有显著影响,这是基于每种物种的孵化成功率与孵化期间最高波高、孵化期间平均波高和研究巢穴遇到2米或更高波的天数之间的负相关关系。在热带气旋期间,每个物种的孵化和羽化成功率最低,这与完全摧毁巢穴的数量增加相对应。与佛罗里达其他海滩的红海龟和绿海龟巢穴相比,我们研究地点的巢穴孵化和出现的成功率更高。这些繁殖成功的评估是在一个经常使用的度假海滩进行的保护计划的一部分,保护行动包括警惕巢死亡因素,并向海滩游客宣传,目的是在海龟筑巢季节促进良心行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Chelonian Conservation and Biology is a biannual peer-reviewed journal of cosmopolitan and broad-based coverage of all aspects of conservation and biology of all chelonians, including freshwater turtles, marine turtles, and tortoises. Manuscripts may cover any aspects of turtle and tortoise research, with a preference for conservation or biology. Manuscripts dealing with conservation biology, systematic relationships, chelonian diversity, geographic distribution, natural history, ecology, reproduction, morphology and natural variation, population status, husbandry, community conservation initiatives, and human exploitation or conservation management issues are of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Reducing the Impact of Tagging on Flatback Turtles Using Double Passive Integrated Transponder Tags The Importance of Riparian and Aquatic Resources in the Diet of Dermatemys mawii in a Lentic System in Southern Mexico Impact of Intrabeach Incubation Substrate Variability on Sea Turtle Reproductive Success A Comparison of Vertebrate Associates of Gopher Tortoise and Nine-Banded Armadillo Burrows in South Georgia A Sawback is a Sawback is a Sawback: Diet and Habitat-Related Variation in Body Size of the Turtle Graptemys oculifera Show It Is an Ecological Analogue of Its Two Closest Relatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1