Students’ use of learning resources for writing in physics and Norwegian

Norunn Askeland, Bente Aamotsbakken
{"title":"Students’ use of learning resources for writing in physics and Norwegian","authors":"Norunn Askeland, Bente Aamotsbakken","doi":"10.2478/DFL-2014-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we discuss dilemmas and paradoxes in the use of learning resources and the need to list sources when writing, issues that are relevant for students as well as for teachers and authors of textbooks. We draw on experience from a Norwegian research project investigating students’ writing in two subjects: physics and Norwegian in senior high and university. We study the genres used when students write in order to get knowledge and skills, and we have a special interest in the use of learning resources. It is evident that the two subjects represent different text cultures, but we have seen that there are also similarities in the use of learning resources in writing. Methodologically, we have used interviews in focus groups in addition to personal letters from the students. In this article we are especially interested in students who are considered to be successful writers and even risk- writers, i.e. writers who are so self-confident that they have the courage to break with established norms and conventions. The risk-writers are aware of borders between intertextuality and plagiarism and know how to work with sources in order to be creative and innovative writers even though they do it in different ways in the two textual cultures. In conclusion we suggest possibilities for bridging the two cultures by changing the learning resources and textbooks and the way of writing.","PeriodicalId":31187,"journal":{"name":"Designs for Learning","volume":"6 1","pages":"9-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs for Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/DFL-2014-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article we discuss dilemmas and paradoxes in the use of learning resources and the need to list sources when writing, issues that are relevant for students as well as for teachers and authors of textbooks. We draw on experience from a Norwegian research project investigating students’ writing in two subjects: physics and Norwegian in senior high and university. We study the genres used when students write in order to get knowledge and skills, and we have a special interest in the use of learning resources. It is evident that the two subjects represent different text cultures, but we have seen that there are also similarities in the use of learning resources in writing. Methodologically, we have used interviews in focus groups in addition to personal letters from the students. In this article we are especially interested in students who are considered to be successful writers and even risk- writers, i.e. writers who are so self-confident that they have the courage to break with established norms and conventions. The risk-writers are aware of borders between intertextuality and plagiarism and know how to work with sources in order to be creative and innovative writers even though they do it in different ways in the two textual cultures. In conclusion we suggest possibilities for bridging the two cultures by changing the learning resources and textbooks and the way of writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对物理和挪威语写作学习资源的使用
在这篇文章中,我们讨论了学习资源使用中的困境和悖论,以及在写作时列出资源的必要性,这些问题与学生、教师和教科书作者有关。我们借鉴了挪威一项研究项目的经验,该项目调查了学生在高中和大学的物理和挪威语两门学科的写作情况。我们研究学生写作时使用的体裁,以获得知识和技能,我们对学习资源的使用特别感兴趣。很明显,这两个主体代表着不同的语篇文化,但我们也看到了在写作中使用学习资源的相似之处。在方法上,除了学生的私人信件外,我们还使用了焦点小组访谈。在这篇文章中,我们特别感兴趣的是那些被认为是成功的作家,甚至是冒险作家的学生,也就是说,那些非常自信的作家,他们有勇气打破既定的规范和惯例。风险作家意识到互文性和剽窃之间的界限,并且知道如何与来源合作,以便成为有创造力和创新的作家,即使他们在两种文本文化中以不同的方式做到这一点。总之,我们建议通过改变学习资源、教科书和写作方式来弥合两种文化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Students’ Multimodal Texts in the Subject of English: Synthesising Peers’ and Teachers’ Recognition of Semiotic Work App-Genres for Children’s Agency – Affordances in Applications Used in Preschool Design Sprint Workshops – Exploring a Data-Based Method in Mathematics Education Motivational Factors for Empowering People with Diabetes and the Influence of Perceived Self-Efficacy Editorial for the Special Collection: Remediation of Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1