Bridging Feminist Art, Activism, and Theory: A Review of Three Contemporary Texts

J. Dallow
{"title":"Bridging Feminist Art, Activism, and Theory: A Review of Three Contemporary Texts","authors":"J. Dallow","doi":"10.2979/NWS.2007.19.1.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suzanne Lacy provides a framework for conceptualizing feminist activist art in a letter to Patricia Hills, editor of the anthology Modern Art in the USA: Issues and Controversies of the 20th Century. Lacy asks, \"How can we work as artists on a broader scale, to create change that will penetrate and affect the institutions, public spaces, and political processes that make up our public culture\" iHills 2001, 452)? This political goal has overwhelmingly driven feminist activism of the last century. Yet, as Lacy suggests, a wider horizon challenges feminist art practice. To date, feminist art-making has played only one role within an expansive field that necessarily includes feminist theory, cultural criticism, and art history. The numerous texts published on feminist art/theory within the last ten years suggest that any singular account of this dense nexus proves daunting. In an increasingly theory-driven moment, we are still sorting out the question: where and when do theory, art-making, and activism, meet? Or, one might ask where, and when, can they be separated? Although none of the three very different texts under consideration here provide direct answers to these questions, they illuminate distinct modes of engaging them. Two of the texts are anthologies: The Feminisim and Visual Culture Reader assembles 62 significant writings on feminism's convergence with visual culture in the Anglophone world in the latter twentieth century, while Modern Art in the USA: Issues and Controversies of the 20th Century is a more varied collection of essays by artists, curators, and critics reaching back one hundred years. As a counterpoint to these volumes, Insurgent Muse: Life and Art at the Woman's Building tells of one woman's experiences in a vibrant center of pioneer feminist activism that centered on art, the Woman's Building in Los Angeles. Part coming-of-age and part coming-out tale, writer Terry Wolverton's memoir, Insurgent Muse: Life and Art at the Woman's Building, provocatively chronicles her involvement with the Woman's Building. Founded","PeriodicalId":88071,"journal":{"name":"NWSA journal : a publication of the National Women's Studies Association","volume":"19 1","pages":"166 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NWSA journal : a publication of the National Women's Studies Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2007.19.1.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Suzanne Lacy provides a framework for conceptualizing feminist activist art in a letter to Patricia Hills, editor of the anthology Modern Art in the USA: Issues and Controversies of the 20th Century. Lacy asks, "How can we work as artists on a broader scale, to create change that will penetrate and affect the institutions, public spaces, and political processes that make up our public culture" iHills 2001, 452)? This political goal has overwhelmingly driven feminist activism of the last century. Yet, as Lacy suggests, a wider horizon challenges feminist art practice. To date, feminist art-making has played only one role within an expansive field that necessarily includes feminist theory, cultural criticism, and art history. The numerous texts published on feminist art/theory within the last ten years suggest that any singular account of this dense nexus proves daunting. In an increasingly theory-driven moment, we are still sorting out the question: where and when do theory, art-making, and activism, meet? Or, one might ask where, and when, can they be separated? Although none of the three very different texts under consideration here provide direct answers to these questions, they illuminate distinct modes of engaging them. Two of the texts are anthologies: The Feminisim and Visual Culture Reader assembles 62 significant writings on feminism's convergence with visual culture in the Anglophone world in the latter twentieth century, while Modern Art in the USA: Issues and Controversies of the 20th Century is a more varied collection of essays by artists, curators, and critics reaching back one hundred years. As a counterpoint to these volumes, Insurgent Muse: Life and Art at the Woman's Building tells of one woman's experiences in a vibrant center of pioneer feminist activism that centered on art, the Woman's Building in Los Angeles. Part coming-of-age and part coming-out tale, writer Terry Wolverton's memoir, Insurgent Muse: Life and Art at the Woman's Building, provocatively chronicles her involvement with the Woman's Building. Founded
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接女性主义艺术、行动主义和理论:三个当代文本的回顾
苏珊娜·莱西在给《美国现代艺术:20世纪的问题与争议》选集的编辑帕特里夏·希尔斯的一封信中提供了一个概念化女权主义激进主义艺术的框架。莱西问道:“作为艺术家,我们如何在更大的范围内工作,创造能够渗透和影响构成我们公共文化的机构、公共空间和政治进程的变化?”(hills 2001, 452)。这一政治目标极大地推动了上个世纪的女权主义运动。然而,正如莱西所说,更广阔的视野挑战着女权主义艺术实践。迄今为止,女权主义艺术创作在一个必然包括女权主义理论、文化批评和艺术史的广阔领域中只扮演了一个角色。在过去十年中发表的关于女权主义艺术/理论的大量文本表明,对这种紧密联系的任何单一描述都证明是令人生畏的。在一个越来越受理论驱动的时代,我们仍然在整理这样一个问题:理论、艺术创作和行动主义在何时何地相遇?或者,有人可能会问,他们何时何地可以分开?虽然这里所考虑的三个非常不同的文本都没有提供这些问题的直接答案,但它们阐明了参与这些问题的不同模式。其中两本是选集:《女权主义和视觉文化读本》汇集了20世纪后期英语世界中女权主义与视觉文化融合的62篇重要著作,而《美国现代艺术:20世纪的问题和争议》则是一本更多样化的文集,汇集了100年前艺术家、策展人和评论家的文章。《反叛的缪斯:女性大厦的生活与艺术》讲述了一位女性在一个充满活力的以艺术为中心的先锋女权主义活动中心——洛杉矶女性大厦——的经历。作家特里·沃尔弗顿的回忆录《反叛的缪斯:女性大厦的生活与艺术》既是成长的故事,也是出柜的故事。这本书以煽动性的方式记录了她与女性大厦的关系。成立
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
반복적 경력단절에 관한 연구 노동시장 내 지체 및 뇌병변 장애여성의 건강변화 인식과 대처 전략에 관한 연구 주제어 연결망 분석을 활용한 국내 여성리더십 연구 동향 여성창업기업과 남성창업기업의 생존특성 비교연구 산재근로자의 직업복귀 성과와 젠더 특성에 관한 종단 연구
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1