Hermeneutic Responsibility in Political Judgement. Retrieving Factual Truth From Direct Interaction

Eveline Cioflec
{"title":"Hermeneutic Responsibility in Political Judgement. Retrieving Factual Truth From Direct Interaction","authors":"Eveline Cioflec","doi":"10.24193/subbphil.2022.3.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"In this paper I am arguing for hermeneutic responsibility in political judgment, as it can be attributed to Arendt’s work. Political judgment is reflective judgment relying on representation by imagination and therefore only has exemplary validity. Along the line of Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy I point out her argument for a different generality in politics than the generality of concepts. This generality of political judgment always refers back to the particular. Only by this reference to the particular, namely to facts and situations of direct interaction, can the spectator, who undertakes the political judgment, create the public realm where action takes place. However, this task attributed to the spectator also implies the task of reshaping the public realm. These acts of giving an account of and reconsidering all over again facts handed over by narration and testimony imply the hermeneutic responsibility to unceasingly retrieve factual truth which is rooted in direct interaction. Keywords: Hannah Arendt, factual truth, reproductive imagination, political judgment, hermeneutic responsibility. \"","PeriodicalId":40516,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2022.3.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"In this paper I am arguing for hermeneutic responsibility in political judgment, as it can be attributed to Arendt’s work. Political judgment is reflective judgment relying on representation by imagination and therefore only has exemplary validity. Along the line of Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy I point out her argument for a different generality in politics than the generality of concepts. This generality of political judgment always refers back to the particular. Only by this reference to the particular, namely to facts and situations of direct interaction, can the spectator, who undertakes the political judgment, create the public realm where action takes place. However, this task attributed to the spectator also implies the task of reshaping the public realm. These acts of giving an account of and reconsidering all over again facts handed over by narration and testimony imply the hermeneutic responsibility to unceasingly retrieve factual truth which is rooted in direct interaction. Keywords: Hannah Arendt, factual truth, reproductive imagination, political judgment, hermeneutic responsibility. "
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治判断中的解释学责任。从直接互动中获取事实真相
“在本文中,我主张政治判断中的解释学责任,因为它可以归因于阿伦特的工作。政治判断是一种依赖于想象表象的反思性判断,因此仅具有示范效力。沿着阿伦特关于康德政治哲学讲座的思路,我指出了她关于政治的普遍性与概念的普遍性不同的论点。这种政治判断的普遍性总是指向特殊性。只有通过这种对特定事物的参照,即对直接互动的事实和情境的参照,承担政治判断的旁观者才能创造出行动发生的公共领域。然而,这个赋予观众的任务也隐含着重塑公共领域的任务。这些对叙述和证言所传递的事实进行重新解释和反思的行为,隐含着不断找回事实真相的解释学责任,这种责任根植于直接的互动。关键词:汉娜·阿伦特,事实真相,再生性想象,政治判断,解释学责任
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Hermeneutical Truth and Authorial Intention: Modern Projects Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence Functioning in the XXIst Century Intertwinement: The Modalities Of The Ungraspable Logical and Rhetorical Structure of News. Case Study The Reception of Participatory Art. The Case of Documenta Fifteen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1