Perioperative Cardiac Morbidity in Elderly Patients with Epidural versus Systemic Analgesia for Hip Fracture Surgery

Marina Temelkovska-Stevanovska, Trajkovska Trajanka, Maja Mojsova-Mijovska, M. Jovanovski-Srceva
{"title":"Perioperative Cardiac Morbidity in Elderly Patients with Epidural versus Systemic Analgesia for Hip Fracture Surgery","authors":"Marina Temelkovska-Stevanovska, Trajkovska Trajanka, Maja Mojsova-Mijovska, M. Jovanovski-Srceva","doi":"10.2478/mmr-2014-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. Patients with hip fracture are usually older patients. Uncontrolled acute pain and surgical stress in elderly patients may cause increased cardiac morbidity and mortality. Epidural analgesia blocks sympathetic nervous system and reduces the incidence of myocardial ischemia and dysrhythmias as well as the response to stress. Methods. Sixty patients with hip fracture older than 65 years with previously defined high peroperative cardiac risk according to ACC/AHA guidelines were included and were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 patients: SA group-patients with systemic analgesia. niflam 2 × 100 mg/iv and tramadol 1 mg/kg/iv every 8 hours; and EDC group-patients with a continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine 0.125%-5 ml/h and fentanyl 3 µg/ml. As end points of the study the incidence of cardiac events in both groups were registered: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, unstable angina and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Laboratory parameters and pain intensity were determined in all patients by using Verbal Descriptive Scale. Side effects were also monitored. Results. The epidural analgesia decreased the incidence of peroperative cardiac events in patients with high per-operative cardiac risk for hip fracture surgery (46.6% in SA group vs. 15% in EDC group) and at the same time decreased cardiac mortality (10% in SA group vs. 0% in EDC group). The values of VDS were significantly lower in patients with EDC block versus patients with systemic analgesia in all experimental times and there was a smaller number of side effects. Conclusion. Early administration of continuous epidural analgesia in patients with high peroperative risk with hip fracture decreases the incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality and provides superior pre- and post-operative analgesia compared to systemic analgesia with minimal side effects.","PeriodicalId":86800,"journal":{"name":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","volume":"68 1","pages":"100 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmr-2014-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Patients with hip fracture are usually older patients. Uncontrolled acute pain and surgical stress in elderly patients may cause increased cardiac morbidity and mortality. Epidural analgesia blocks sympathetic nervous system and reduces the incidence of myocardial ischemia and dysrhythmias as well as the response to stress. Methods. Sixty patients with hip fracture older than 65 years with previously defined high peroperative cardiac risk according to ACC/AHA guidelines were included and were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 patients: SA group-patients with systemic analgesia. niflam 2 × 100 mg/iv and tramadol 1 mg/kg/iv every 8 hours; and EDC group-patients with a continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine 0.125%-5 ml/h and fentanyl 3 µg/ml. As end points of the study the incidence of cardiac events in both groups were registered: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, unstable angina and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Laboratory parameters and pain intensity were determined in all patients by using Verbal Descriptive Scale. Side effects were also monitored. Results. The epidural analgesia decreased the incidence of peroperative cardiac events in patients with high per-operative cardiac risk for hip fracture surgery (46.6% in SA group vs. 15% in EDC group) and at the same time decreased cardiac mortality (10% in SA group vs. 0% in EDC group). The values of VDS were significantly lower in patients with EDC block versus patients with systemic analgesia in all experimental times and there was a smaller number of side effects. Conclusion. Early administration of continuous epidural analgesia in patients with high peroperative risk with hip fracture decreases the incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality and provides superior pre- and post-operative analgesia compared to systemic analgesia with minimal side effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年髋部骨折手术硬膜外与全身镇痛围手术期心脏发病率的比较
摘要介绍。髋部骨折的患者通常是老年患者。老年患者不受控制的急性疼痛和手术压力可能导致心脏发病率和死亡率增加。硬膜外镇痛阻断交感神经系统,减少心肌缺血和心律失常的发生率以及对应激的反应。方法。根据ACC/AHA指南,纳入60例年龄大于65岁且术前定义为高心脏风险的髋部骨折患者,随机分为两组,每组30例患者:SA组,全身性镇痛组。尼夫兰2 × 100 mg/iv,曲马多1 mg/kg/iv,每8小时;EDC组:布比卡因0.125% ~ 5 ml/h,芬太尼3µg/ml连续硬膜外镇痛。作为研究的终点,记录了两组心脏事件的发生率:心源性死亡、心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭、不稳定型心绞痛和新发心房颤动。所有患者的实验室参数和疼痛强度采用言语描述量表进行测定。副作用也被监测。结果。硬膜外镇痛降低了髋部骨折手术中高心脏风险患者术中心脏事件的发生率(SA组46.6%,EDC组15%),同时降低了心脏死亡率(SA组10%,EDC组0%)。在所有实验时间内,EDC阻滞患者的VDS值均明显低于全身性镇痛患者,且副作用较少。结论。术后髋部骨折高风险患者早期给予持续硬膜外镇痛可降低心脏发病率和死亡率,与全身镇痛相比,提供更好的术前和术后镇痛,且副作用最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypertension after Kidney Transplantation Case Report of Feminizing Genital Reconstruction in a Female with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with Remifentanil Versus Intermittent Epidural Boluses for Labor Analgesia Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Epileptic Seizures: Frequency, Localization and Seizures Types Reactive Stroma in Prostatic Carcinoma and Correlation with Tumor Grade and Tumor Stage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1