Shy / silent users of contraceptives in Pakistan.

Q4 Social Sciences Pakistan Development Review Pub Date : 1996-01-01 DOI:10.30541/V35I4IIPP.705-717
S. S. Hashmi
{"title":"Shy / silent users of contraceptives in Pakistan.","authors":"S. S. Hashmi","doi":"10.30541/V35I4IIPP.705-717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the hypothesis that shy, silent users of contraceptives in Pakistan underreport contraceptive usage. Data were obtained from the 1984-85 and 1994-95 Contraceptive Prevalence Surveys, the 1990-91 Demographic and Health Survey, and a Punjab 1993 survey. The data were reorganized to indicate the number of women who were fecund but did not have a birth within the preceding 5 years before the surveys. 698,864 women in 1984-85 did not have children and did not report contraceptive use, or 5.9% of total respondents. If these women were added to the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR), it would rise from 7.6% to 13.5%. The higher CPR is consistent with the observed total fertility rate of 5.95. Shy or silent users were 11.9% in 1990-91 and 11.3% in 1994-95. The revised CPRs are 23.7% and 29.1%, respectively. In 1993, a follow-up survey among non-users in Punjab province showed that CPR increased from 13% in 1990-91 to 18% in 1993. Withdrawal was the most widely used method, followed by the condom and female sterilization. The increase in CPR is attributed to more open reporting among shy or silent users. Revised CPRs that include shy or silent users were consistent with total fertility rates in all 3 nationally representative surveys. Typically shy or silent users were older by about 2.3 years than current users, but had similarly aged husbands. Shy or silent users had longer duration of marriage, greater illiteracy, and less contraceptive knowledge about methods and sources. Shy or silent women had lower children ever born rates than current users.","PeriodicalId":35921,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Development Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30541/V35I4IIPP.705-717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study examines the hypothesis that shy, silent users of contraceptives in Pakistan underreport contraceptive usage. Data were obtained from the 1984-85 and 1994-95 Contraceptive Prevalence Surveys, the 1990-91 Demographic and Health Survey, and a Punjab 1993 survey. The data were reorganized to indicate the number of women who were fecund but did not have a birth within the preceding 5 years before the surveys. 698,864 women in 1984-85 did not have children and did not report contraceptive use, or 5.9% of total respondents. If these women were added to the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR), it would rise from 7.6% to 13.5%. The higher CPR is consistent with the observed total fertility rate of 5.95. Shy or silent users were 11.9% in 1990-91 and 11.3% in 1994-95. The revised CPRs are 23.7% and 29.1%, respectively. In 1993, a follow-up survey among non-users in Punjab province showed that CPR increased from 13% in 1990-91 to 18% in 1993. Withdrawal was the most widely used method, followed by the condom and female sterilization. The increase in CPR is attributed to more open reporting among shy or silent users. Revised CPRs that include shy or silent users were consistent with total fertility rates in all 3 nationally representative surveys. Typically shy or silent users were older by about 2.3 years than current users, but had similarly aged husbands. Shy or silent users had longer duration of marriage, greater illiteracy, and less contraceptive knowledge about methods and sources. Shy or silent women had lower children ever born rates than current users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦害羞/沉默的避孕药使用者。
这项研究检验了巴基斯坦害羞、沉默的避孕药具使用者少报避孕药具使用率的假设。数据来自1984-85年和1994-95年避孕普及率调查、1990-91年人口和健康调查以及1993年旁遮普省调查。这些数据被重新整理,以显示在调查前5年内生育但没有生育的妇女人数。1984-85年期间,698,864名妇女没有孩子,也没有报告使用避孕措施,占总应答者的5.9%。如果把这些妇女加入到避孕普及率(CPR)中,它将从7.6%上升到13.5%。较高的CPR与观察到的5.95的总生育率一致。1990-91年害羞或沉默的用户占11.9%,1994-95年为11.3%。修订后的cpr分别为23.7%和29.1%。1993年,对旁遮普省非使用者进行的后续调查显示,CPR从1990-91年的13%增加到1993年的18%。退出是最广泛使用的方法,其次是避孕套和女性绝育。心肺复苏术的增加归因于害羞或沉默的使用者更开放的报告。包括害羞或沉默使用者在内的修订后的生育率与所有3次具有全国代表性的调查中的总生育率一致。通常害羞或沉默的用户比目前的用户年龄大2.3岁,但他们的丈夫年龄相仿。害羞或沉默的使用者婚姻持续时间较长,文盲较多,对避孕方法和来源的了解较少。害羞或沉默的女性的孩子出生率比现在的用户要低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Development Review
Pakistan Development Review Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to encourage original scholarly contributions that focus on a broad spectrum of development issues using empirical and theoretical approaches to scientific enquiry. With a view to generating scholarly debate on public policy issues, the journal particularly encourages scientific contributions that explore policy relevant issues pertaining to developing economies in general and Pakistan’s economy in particular.
期刊最新文献
Correlates of child mortality in Pakistan: a hazards model analysis. Correlates of child mortality in Pakistan: a hazards model analysis. Reintegration of Pakistani return migrants from the Middle East in the domestic labour market. Reproductive goals and family planning attitudes in Pakistan: a couple-level analysis. Reproductive goals and family planning attitudes in Pakistan: a couple-level analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1