St. Thomas Aquinas and Fr. Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange on Wonder and the Division of the Sciences

Q3 Arts and Humanities Studia Gilsoniana Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.26385/SG.080212
Anthony Daum
{"title":"St. Thomas Aquinas and Fr. Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange on Wonder and the Division of the Sciences","authors":"Anthony Daum","doi":"10.26385/SG.080212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay is a comparison between St. Thomas Aquinas’s and Fr. Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange’s conceptions of philosophical wonder and the division of the sciences. While these two great philosophertheologians are separated by almost 700 years, they have largely compatible views on these topics. This is due, no doubt, to the fact that Garrigou-Lagrange (1877–1964), being a Dominican himself, is deeply indebted to Aquinas, but he does also make some significant developments of his own, which is to be expected. Thomas Aquinas needs no introduction, but, these days, Garrigou-Lagrange does. He is simply one of the greatest philosophertheologians within the Thomistic tradition of the last century and whose most famous student was Pope St. John Paul II. Garrigou-Lagrange has, up until recently, been largely forgotten for two intertwined reasons. First, he was (in)famously labeled as “the Sacred Monster of Thomism” (which forces most people to make an immediate judgment based on their personal views of Thomism as practiced in the early 20 century).","PeriodicalId":36983,"journal":{"name":"Studia Gilsoniana","volume":"8 1","pages":"249-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Gilsoniana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26385/SG.080212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay is a comparison between St. Thomas Aquinas’s and Fr. Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange’s conceptions of philosophical wonder and the division of the sciences. While these two great philosophertheologians are separated by almost 700 years, they have largely compatible views on these topics. This is due, no doubt, to the fact that Garrigou-Lagrange (1877–1964), being a Dominican himself, is deeply indebted to Aquinas, but he does also make some significant developments of his own, which is to be expected. Thomas Aquinas needs no introduction, but, these days, Garrigou-Lagrange does. He is simply one of the greatest philosophertheologians within the Thomistic tradition of the last century and whose most famous student was Pope St. John Paul II. Garrigou-Lagrange has, up until recently, been largely forgotten for two intertwined reasons. First, he was (in)famously labeled as “the Sacred Monster of Thomism” (which forces most people to make an immediate judgment based on their personal views of Thomism as practiced in the early 20 century).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣托马斯·阿奎那和拉格朗日神父论奇迹和科学的分裂
本文比较了圣托马斯·阿奎那和拉格朗日关于哲学奇迹和科学划分的概念。虽然这两位伟大的哲学神学家相隔近700年,但他们在这些问题上的观点在很大程度上是一致的。毫无疑问,这是由于加里古-拉格朗日(1877-1964),作为一个多明尼加人,深深感谢阿奎那,但他也做出了自己的一些重大发展,这是意料之中的。托马斯·阿奎那不需要介绍了,但如今,加里古-拉格朗日需要介绍。他只是上个世纪托马斯主义传统中最伟大的哲学神学家之一,他最著名的学生是教皇圣约翰·保罗二世。直到最近,加里古-拉格朗日理论在很大程度上被遗忘,原因有两个。首先,他被贴上了“托马斯主义的神圣怪物”的著名标签(这迫使大多数人根据他们对20世纪早期实践的托马斯主义的个人看法立即做出判断)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Gilsoniana
Studia Gilsoniana Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
On the Foundational Compatibility of Phenomenology and Thomism On Affirming the Unintelligible God: Examining Denys Turner’s Account of Atheism Étienne Gilson: L’idée de la beauté et sa conception de l’art Separation as the Basic Method of Realistic Metaphysics: The Approach by the Lublin Philosophical School Representatives La critica alla Rivoluzione nel pensiero di Augusto Del Noce by Roberto de Mattei
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1