Delineation of the hydrogeologic framework of the Big Sioux aquifer near Sioux Falls, South Dakota, using airborne electromagnetic data

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3133/sim3393
Kristen J. Valseth, G. C. Delzer, C. V. Price
{"title":"Delineation of the hydrogeologic framework of the Big Sioux aquifer near Sioux Falls, South Dakota, using airborne electromagnetic data","authors":"Kristen J. Valseth, G. C. Delzer, C. V. Price","doi":"10.3133/sim3393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, began developing a groundwater-fl ow model of the Big Sioux aquifer in 2014 that will enable the City to make more informed water management decisions, such as delineation of areas of the greatest specifi c yield, which is crucial for locating municipal wells. Innovative tools are being evaluated as part of this study that can improve the delineation of the hydrogeologic framework of the aquifer for use in development of a groundwater-fl ow model, and the approach could have transfer value for similar hydrogeologic settings. The fi rst step in developing a groundwater-fl ow model is determining the hydrogeologic framework (vertical and horizontal extents of the aquifer), which typically is determined by interpreting geologic information from drillers’ logs and surfi cial geology maps. However, well and borehole data only provide hydrogeologic information for a single location; conversely, nearly continuous geophysical data are collected along fl ight lines using airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveys. These electromagnetic data are collected every 3 meters along a fl ight line (on average) and subsequently can be related to hydrogeologic properties. AEM data, coupled with and constrained by well and borehole data, can substantially improve the accuracy of aquifer hydrogeologic framework delineations and result in better groundwater-fl ow models. AEM data were acquired using the Resolve frequency-domain AEM system to map the Big Sioux aquifer in the region of the city of Sioux Falls. The survey acquired more than 870 line-kilometers of AEM data over a total area of about 145 square kilometers, primarily over the fl ood plain of the Big Sioux River between the cities of Dell Rapids and Sioux Falls. The U.S. Geological Survey inverted the survey data to generate resistivity-depth sections that were used in two-dimensional maps and in three-dimensional volumetric visualizations of the Earth resistivity distribution. Contact lines were drawn using a geographic information system to delineate interpreted geologic stratigraphy. The contact lines were converted to points and then interpolated into a raster surface. The methods used to develop elevation and depth maps of the hydrogeologic framework of the Big Sioux aquifer are described herein. The fi nal AEM interpreted aquifer thickness ranged from 0 to 31 meters with an average thickness of 12.8 meters. The estimated total volume of the aquifer was 1,060,000,000 cubic meters based on the assumption that the top of the aquifer is the land-surface elevation. A simple calculation of the volume (length times width times height) of a previous delineation of the aquifer estimated the aquifer volume at 378,000,000 cubic meters; thus, the estimation based on AEM data is more than twice the previous estimate. The depth to top of Sioux Quartzite, which ranged in depth from 0 to 90 meters, also was delineated from the AEM data.","PeriodicalId":36283,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, began developing a groundwater-fl ow model of the Big Sioux aquifer in 2014 that will enable the City to make more informed water management decisions, such as delineation of areas of the greatest specifi c yield, which is crucial for locating municipal wells. Innovative tools are being evaluated as part of this study that can improve the delineation of the hydrogeologic framework of the aquifer for use in development of a groundwater-fl ow model, and the approach could have transfer value for similar hydrogeologic settings. The fi rst step in developing a groundwater-fl ow model is determining the hydrogeologic framework (vertical and horizontal extents of the aquifer), which typically is determined by interpreting geologic information from drillers’ logs and surfi cial geology maps. However, well and borehole data only provide hydrogeologic information for a single location; conversely, nearly continuous geophysical data are collected along fl ight lines using airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveys. These electromagnetic data are collected every 3 meters along a fl ight line (on average) and subsequently can be related to hydrogeologic properties. AEM data, coupled with and constrained by well and borehole data, can substantially improve the accuracy of aquifer hydrogeologic framework delineations and result in better groundwater-fl ow models. AEM data were acquired using the Resolve frequency-domain AEM system to map the Big Sioux aquifer in the region of the city of Sioux Falls. The survey acquired more than 870 line-kilometers of AEM data over a total area of about 145 square kilometers, primarily over the fl ood plain of the Big Sioux River between the cities of Dell Rapids and Sioux Falls. The U.S. Geological Survey inverted the survey data to generate resistivity-depth sections that were used in two-dimensional maps and in three-dimensional volumetric visualizations of the Earth resistivity distribution. Contact lines were drawn using a geographic information system to delineate interpreted geologic stratigraphy. The contact lines were converted to points and then interpolated into a raster surface. The methods used to develop elevation and depth maps of the hydrogeologic framework of the Big Sioux aquifer are described herein. The fi nal AEM interpreted aquifer thickness ranged from 0 to 31 meters with an average thickness of 12.8 meters. The estimated total volume of the aquifer was 1,060,000,000 cubic meters based on the assumption that the top of the aquifer is the land-surface elevation. A simple calculation of the volume (length times width times height) of a previous delineation of the aquifer estimated the aquifer volume at 378,000,000 cubic meters; thus, the estimation based on AEM data is more than twice the previous estimate. The depth to top of Sioux Quartzite, which ranged in depth from 0 to 90 meters, also was delineated from the AEM data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南达科他州苏福尔斯附近的大苏含水层的水文地质框架的描绘,使用航空电磁数据
美国地质调查局与南达科他州苏福尔斯市合作,于2014年开始开发大苏福尔斯含水层的地下水流动模型,该模型将使该市能够做出更明智的水管理决策,例如划定最大特定产量区域,这对定位市政井至关重要。作为这项研究的一部分,正在评估创新的工具,这些工具可以改善对含水层水文地质框架的描绘,用于开发地下水流动模型,并且该方法可能对类似的水文地质环境具有转移价值。开发地下水流动模型的第一步是确定水文地质框架(含水层的垂直和水平范围),这通常是通过解释钻探人员的测井曲线和地表地质图的地质信息来确定的。然而,井眼数据只能提供单一地点的水文地质信息;相反,使用机载电磁(AEM)测量沿着航线收集几乎连续的地球物理数据。这些电磁数据沿飞行线(平均)每3米收集一次,随后可以与水文地质性质有关。AEM数据与井眼数据相结合并受其约束,可以大大提高含水层水文地质框架圈定的准确性,从而得到更好的地下水流动模型。AEM数据是使用Resolve频域AEM系统获取的,用于绘制苏福尔斯市地区的大苏含水层。该调查在总面积约145平方公里的区域内获得了超过870行公里的AEM数据,主要是在戴尔急流城和苏福尔斯市之间的大苏河泛滥平原上。美国地质调查局(U.S. Geological Survey)对调查数据进行了倒转,生成了用于二维地图和三维地球电阻率分布体可视化的电阻率深度剖面。使用地理信息系统绘制接触线来描绘解释的地质地层。将接触线转换为点,然后插值到栅格表面。本文描述了用于开发大苏含水层水文地质框架的高程和深度图的方法。最终AEM解释的含水层厚度范围为0 ~ 31 m,平均厚度为12.8 m。假设含水层顶部为地表高程,估算含水层总积为106亿立方米。对先前圈定的含水层的体积(长×宽×高)进行简单计算,估计含水层的体积为3.78亿立方米;因此,基于AEM数据的估计是以前估计的两倍以上。根据AEM数据,还圈定了苏石英岩的顶部至深度,范围为0 ~ 90米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Mapping karst groundwater flow paths and delineating recharge areas for Fern Cave, Alabama, through the use of dye tracing Stratigraphic Cross Sections of the Lewis Shale in the Eastern Part of the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming and Colorado Colored shaded-relief bathymetric map and orthomosaic from structure-from-motion quantitative underwater imaging device with five cameras of the Lake Tahoe floor, California Groundwater potentiometric-surface altitude in 2022 and groundwater-level changes between 1968, 1991, and 2022, in the alluvial aquifer in the Big Lost River Valley, south-central Idaho Geologic map of the source region of Shalbatana Vallis, Mars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1