The third and fourth dimensions of landscape: Towards conceptual models of topographically complex landscapes

Q2 Environmental Science Landscape Online Pub Date : 2010-11-18 DOI:10.3097/LO.201022
L. Drăguţ, U. Walz, T. Blaschke
{"title":"The third and fourth dimensions of landscape: Towards conceptual models of topographically complex landscapes","authors":"L. Drăguţ, U. Walz, T. Blaschke","doi":"10.3097/LO.201022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relating spatial patterns to ecological processes is one of the central goals of landscape ecology. The patch-corridor-matrix model and landscape metrics have been the predominant approach to describe the spatial arrangement of discrete elements (“patches”) for the last two decades. However, the widely used approach of using landscape metrics for characterizing categorical map patterns is connected with a number of problems. We aim at stimulating further developments in the field of the analysis of spatio-temporal landscape patterns by providing both a critical review of existing techniques and clarifying their pros and cons as well as demonstrating how to extent common approaches in landscape ecology (e.g. the patch-corridor-matrix model). The extension into the third dimension means adding information on the relief and height of vegetation, while the fourth dimension means the temporal, dynamic aspect of landscapes. The contribution is structured around three main topics: the third dimension of landscapes, the fourth dimension of landscapes, and spatial and temporal scales in landscape analysis. Based on the results of a symposium on this theme at the IALE conference in 2009 in Salzburg and a literature review we emphasize the need to add topographic information into evaluations of landscape structure, the appropriate consideration of scales; and to consider the ambiguity and even contradiction between landscape metrics.","PeriodicalId":38803,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Online","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Relating spatial patterns to ecological processes is one of the central goals of landscape ecology. The patch-corridor-matrix model and landscape metrics have been the predominant approach to describe the spatial arrangement of discrete elements (“patches”) for the last two decades. However, the widely used approach of using landscape metrics for characterizing categorical map patterns is connected with a number of problems. We aim at stimulating further developments in the field of the analysis of spatio-temporal landscape patterns by providing both a critical review of existing techniques and clarifying their pros and cons as well as demonstrating how to extent common approaches in landscape ecology (e.g. the patch-corridor-matrix model). The extension into the third dimension means adding information on the relief and height of vegetation, while the fourth dimension means the temporal, dynamic aspect of landscapes. The contribution is structured around three main topics: the third dimension of landscapes, the fourth dimension of landscapes, and spatial and temporal scales in landscape analysis. Based on the results of a symposium on this theme at the IALE conference in 2009 in Salzburg and a literature review we emphasize the need to add topographic information into evaluations of landscape structure, the appropriate consideration of scales; and to consider the ambiguity and even contradiction between landscape metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
景观的第三和第四个维度:走向地形复杂景观的概念模型
将空间格局与生态过程联系起来是景观生态学的核心目标之一。在过去的二十年中,斑块-走廊-矩阵模型和景观度量一直是描述离散元素(“斑块”)空间排列的主要方法。然而,广泛使用的使用景观指标来表征分类地图模式的方法与许多问题有关。我们的目标是通过对现有技术的批判性回顾,阐明其优缺点,以及展示如何扩展景观生态学中的常用方法(例如斑块-走廊-矩阵模型),促进时空景观格局分析领域的进一步发展。扩展到第三维度意味着增加关于植被的起伏和高度的信息,而第四个维度意味着景观的时间和动态方面。该贡献围绕三个主要主题:景观的第三维度,景观的第四个维度,以及景观分析的时空尺度。基于2009年在萨尔茨堡举行的IALE会议上关于这一主题的研讨会的结果和文献综述,我们强调需要在景观结构评估中加入地形信息,适当考虑尺度;并考虑景观指标之间的歧义甚至矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Online
Landscape Online Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Online focuses on studies dealing with landscape research. The subject matter deals with any scientific, educational or applied aspect of processes, dynamics, indicators, controllers and visions related to landscapes. Furthermore, Landscape Online emphasizes the coupling of societal and natural systems, not only the involvement of human impact on landscape systems but also human perception of the landscape, its values and the evaluation of landscapes. Moreover, articles are appropriate that deal with landscape theory, system approaches and conceptual models of landscape, both their improvement and their discussion. Papers may be undisciplinary or multidisciplinary but have interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary appeal. All kinds of articles or parts of it must not be published beforehand in another journal
期刊最新文献
Landscape understanding and values in extended public consultations on spatial planning in rural communes in Poland Assessing ecosystem services of mountain lakes The Usage and Constraints of Urban River Corridor from a Socio-ecological Perspective: a Systematic Review Applying analytic hierarchy process for site selection of a recreational-educational children complex in Shiraz City, Iran Odyssey of First IALE World Congress in Africa and Opportunities for North-South or South-South Collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1