Splicing it together: Using primary data to explore RNA splicing and gene expression in large-lecture introductory biology

CourseSource Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.24918/cs.2022.11
Jessie B. Arneson, Jacob Woodbury, Jacey Anderson, Larry B. Collins, A. Cavagnetto, W. B. Davis, E. Offerdahl
{"title":"Splicing it together: Using primary data to explore RNA splicing and gene expression in large-lecture introductory biology","authors":"Jessie B. Arneson, Jacob Woodbury, Jacey Anderson, Larry B. Collins, A. Cavagnetto, W. B. Davis, E. Offerdahl","doi":"10.24918/cs.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the heart of scientific ways of knowing is the systematic collection and analysis of data, which is then used to propose an explanation of how the world works. In this two-day module, students in a large-lecture course are immersed in a biological problem related to the Central Dogma and gene expression. Specifically, students interpret experimental data in small groups, and then use those data to craft a scientific argument to explain how alternative splicing of a transcription factor gene may contribute to human cancer. Prior to the module, students are assigned a reading and provided PowerPoint slides outlining the basics of alternative splicing and refreshing their understanding of gene regulation. Students complete a pre- class assignment designed to reinforce basic terminology and prepare them for interpreting scientific models. Each day of the module, students are presented experimental data or biological models which they interpret in small groups, use to vote for viable hypotheses using clickers, and ultimately leverage in a culminating summary writing task requiring them to craft a data-driven answer to the biological problem. Despite the novelty of the argumentation module, students engage in all aspects (inside and outside of the classroom) of the activity and are connected across data, hypotheses, and course concepts to explain the role of alternative splicing in gene expression and cancer.","PeriodicalId":72713,"journal":{"name":"CourseSource","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CourseSource","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2022.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

At the heart of scientific ways of knowing is the systematic collection and analysis of data, which is then used to propose an explanation of how the world works. In this two-day module, students in a large-lecture course are immersed in a biological problem related to the Central Dogma and gene expression. Specifically, students interpret experimental data in small groups, and then use those data to craft a scientific argument to explain how alternative splicing of a transcription factor gene may contribute to human cancer. Prior to the module, students are assigned a reading and provided PowerPoint slides outlining the basics of alternative splicing and refreshing their understanding of gene regulation. Students complete a pre- class assignment designed to reinforce basic terminology and prepare them for interpreting scientific models. Each day of the module, students are presented experimental data or biological models which they interpret in small groups, use to vote for viable hypotheses using clickers, and ultimately leverage in a culminating summary writing task requiring them to craft a data-driven answer to the biological problem. Despite the novelty of the argumentation module, students engage in all aspects (inside and outside of the classroom) of the activity and are connected across data, hypotheses, and course concepts to explain the role of alternative splicing in gene expression and cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剪接:使用原始数据探索RNA剪接和基因表达在大型讲座生物学入门
科学认知方法的核心是系统地收集和分析数据,然后用这些数据来解释世界是如何运行的。在这个为期两天的模块中,学生们将沉浸在与中心法则和基因表达相关的生物学问题中。具体来说,学生们在小组中解释实验数据,然后利用这些数据来构建科学论据,解释转录因子基因的选择性剪接如何可能导致人类癌症。在学习该模块之前,学生要阅读一篇文章,并提供ppt幻灯片,概述选择性剪接的基础知识,并刷新他们对基因调控的理解。学生完成课前作业,旨在强化基本术语,并为解释科学模型做好准备。该模块的每一天,学生们将被呈现实验数据或生物模型,他们将在小组中解释这些数据,使用点击器投票选出可行的假设,并最终在最终的总结写作任务中发挥作用,要求他们精心设计一个数据驱动的生物学问题答案。尽管论证模块很新颖,但学生们参与了该活动的各个方面(课堂内外),并将数据、假设和课程概念联系起来,解释了选择性剪接在基因表达和癌症中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging Students in Pharmacogenetics: Patient Case Studies Using the PharmGKB Website. Who’s That Speci-Mon? Using PokémonTM to Understand Biological Terminology Using Greek and Latin Roots A Simple Method for Predicting a Molecule's Biological Properties From Its Polarity Good Drug, Bad Practice: Tackling the Ivermectin Fiasco Defining and Understanding Pathogenic Disease: An Engaging Activity That Connects Students’ Lived Experiences With Their Academic Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1