The Safety of Heparin-Free Strategy in Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Dong Jung Kim, J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. Lim, Kay-Hyun Park, H. Chang
{"title":"The Safety of Heparin-Free Strategy in Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation","authors":"Dong Jung Kim, J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. Lim, Kay-Hyun Park, H. Chang","doi":"10.26502/fccm.92920339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The necessity of heparinization during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is well documented. However, heparinization can increase the risk of bleeding in certain situations. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of a heparin-free strategy in patients on VA-ECMO. Methods: Data for 90 adult patients on VA-ECMO, wherein cannulation and maintenance were performed by cardiothoracic surgeons and support was provided for >24 h (2018–2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: heparin-free group, without heparinization for ≥ 24 h during VA-ECMO support (n = 66), and control group (n = 24). Clinical outcomes including hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The reasons for VA-ECMO support included post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 37 patients (41.1%), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44 patients (48.9%). The total duration of VA-ECMO was not significantly different between the two groups (132.3±106.1 vs. 141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734). In the heparin-free group, the duration of VA-ECMO without heparinization was 79.8±60.7 h, and 26 patients (39.4%) were completely heparin-free during the support period. No significant difference was found in the frequency of oxygenator changes due to thrombosis between the two groups (8.3 vs. 10.6%, P>0.999). Pump malfunction was not observed in any group. The overall incidence of thromboembolic complications was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: No additional risk of thromboembolic complications was observed with the use of a heparin-free strategy during VA-ECMO support. Appropriate discontinuation of heparinization could be a safe strategy for VA-ECMO patients with active bleeding or a high hemorrhagic risk.","PeriodicalId":72523,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The necessity of heparinization during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is well documented. However, heparinization can increase the risk of bleeding in certain situations. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of a heparin-free strategy in patients on VA-ECMO. Methods: Data for 90 adult patients on VA-ECMO, wherein cannulation and maintenance were performed by cardiothoracic surgeons and support was provided for >24 h (2018–2021), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: heparin-free group, without heparinization for ≥ 24 h during VA-ECMO support (n = 66), and control group (n = 24). Clinical outcomes including hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The reasons for VA-ECMO support included post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 37 patients (41.1%), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44 patients (48.9%). The total duration of VA-ECMO was not significantly different between the two groups (132.3±106.1 vs. 141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734). In the heparin-free group, the duration of VA-ECMO without heparinization was 79.8±60.7 h, and 26 patients (39.4%) were completely heparin-free during the support period. No significant difference was found in the frequency of oxygenator changes due to thrombosis between the two groups (8.3 vs. 10.6%, P>0.999). Pump malfunction was not observed in any group. The overall incidence of thromboembolic complications was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: No additional risk of thromboembolic complications was observed with the use of a heparin-free strategy during VA-ECMO support. Appropriate discontinuation of heparinization could be a safe strategy for VA-ECMO patients with active bleeding or a high hemorrhagic risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉体外膜氧合支持患者无肝素策略的安全性
背景:静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)过程中肝素化的必要性已得到充分证明。然而,在某些情况下,肝素化会增加出血的风险。本研究的目的是调查无肝素策略在VA-ECMO患者中的安全性。方法:回顾性分析90例成人VA-ECMO患者的数据,这些患者由心胸外科医生进行插管和维持,并提供bbbb24 h(2018-2021)的支持。将患者分为两组:无肝素组(66例)和对照组(24例)。无肝素组在VA-ECMO支持期间不进行肝素化治疗≥24 h。比较两组的临床结果,包括出血和血栓栓塞并发症。结果:采用VA-ECMO支持的原因包括开心术后心源性休克37例(41.1%),体外心肺复苏44例(48.9%)。VA-ECMO总持续时间两组比较差异无统计学意义(132.3±106.1∶141.6±117.9 h, P=0.734)。无肝素组未肝素化的VA-ECMO持续时间为79.8±60.7 h, 26例(39.4%)患者在支持期内完全无肝素。两组患者因血栓形成而改变氧合器的频率差异无统计学意义(8.3 vs 10.6%, P < 0.05 0.999)。各组均未见泵故障。两组血栓栓塞并发症的总发生率无显著差异。结论:在VA-ECMO支持期间,使用无肝素策略未观察到血栓栓塞并发症的额外风险。对于有活动性出血或高出血风险的VA-ECMO患者,适当停止肝素化可能是一种安全的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutrition, Gut Microbiota, and Epigenetics in the Modulation of Immune Response and Metabolic Health. Interaction between Perivascular and Luminal Factors in Arteriovenous Fistula in Yucatan Miniswine. Atrial fibrillation in Retinal Artery Occlusions. Immunomodulation and Thrombolytic Approaches in the Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Apolipoprotein B in the Risk Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiometabolic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1