The Role of Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Uretric Obstruction due to Advanced Abdominopelvic Malignancy: A Retrospective Analysis

Rida Mansoor, M. Faisal, Shahan Raza, H. Ali, O. Shakeel, Zaeem Shahid, Haroon Hafiz
{"title":"The Role of Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Uretric Obstruction due to Advanced Abdominopelvic Malignancy: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Rida Mansoor, M. Faisal, Shahan Raza, H. Ali, O. Shakeel, Zaeem Shahid, Haroon Hafiz","doi":"10.26502/jcsct.5079157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Role of Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Uretric Obstruction due to Advanced Abdominopelvic Malignancy: A Retrospective Analysis. Journal Cancer Science and Clinical Therapeutics 6 214-221. Abstract Introduction: In advanced or metastatic abdominopelvic malignancy, ureteric obstruction is a known complication. (PCN) is a diversion procedure for decompression in order to improve renal function. It is debatable whether PCN is an effective management to relieve ureteric obstruction in a stage IV abdominoperineal disease. The aim of the study is to determine the outcome of PCN tube insertion in a palliative care setting. Methodology: The study was conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore (SKMCH&RC). Data was retrieved from the electronic Hospital Information System (HIS) of the hospital. Duration of the study was from January, 2018 to December, 2020. We included patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy under palliative setting. Results: A total of 111 patients were included in the study. The median age at the time of nephrostomy was 4915.6 years. 67 patients (60.4%) were males, while 44 patients (39.6%) were females. Pre procedural median level of creatinine were was 3.3±3.36. Unilateral nephrostomy was performed in 71 patient (63.9%), while 40 patients (36.1%) underwent bilateral nephrostomy. Post-procedural mean creatinine level were 2.52 + 2.80. Relief of symptoms was observed among 68 patients (62.2%). 75 patients (67.6%) did not develop any complications after the procedure. The two most common complications of the procedure in our study were dislodgement (9%) and infection (9%). Conclusion: PCN is good for symptomatic and biochemical relief even in stage IV cancer, however due to increased incidence of complications in these patients the benefits might outweigh the risks.","PeriodicalId":73634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jcsct.5079157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Role of Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Uretric Obstruction due to Advanced Abdominopelvic Malignancy: A Retrospective Analysis. Journal Cancer Science and Clinical Therapeutics 6 214-221. Abstract Introduction: In advanced or metastatic abdominopelvic malignancy, ureteric obstruction is a known complication. (PCN) is a diversion procedure for decompression in order to improve renal function. It is debatable whether PCN is an effective management to relieve ureteric obstruction in a stage IV abdominoperineal disease. The aim of the study is to determine the outcome of PCN tube insertion in a palliative care setting. Methodology: The study was conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore (SKMCH&RC). Data was retrieved from the electronic Hospital Information System (HIS) of the hospital. Duration of the study was from January, 2018 to December, 2020. We included patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy under palliative setting. Results: A total of 111 patients were included in the study. The median age at the time of nephrostomy was 4915.6 years. 67 patients (60.4%) were males, while 44 patients (39.6%) were females. Pre procedural median level of creatinine were was 3.3±3.36. Unilateral nephrostomy was performed in 71 patient (63.9%), while 40 patients (36.1%) underwent bilateral nephrostomy. Post-procedural mean creatinine level were 2.52 + 2.80. Relief of symptoms was observed among 68 patients (62.2%). 75 patients (67.6%) did not develop any complications after the procedure. The two most common complications of the procedure in our study were dislodgement (9%) and infection (9%). Conclusion: PCN is good for symptomatic and biochemical relief even in stage IV cancer, however due to increased incidence of complications in these patients the benefits might outweigh the risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肾造口术治疗晚期腹盆腔恶性肿瘤致输尿管梗阻的回顾性分析
经皮肾造口术治疗晚期腹盆腔恶性肿瘤致输尿管梗阻的回顾性分析。癌症科学与临床治疗杂志6 214-221。摘要简介:在晚期或转移性腹腔恶性肿瘤中,输尿管梗阻是一种已知的并发症。PCN是一种用于减压的分流手术,目的是改善肾功能。对于IV期腹腔疾病输尿管梗阻,PCN是否是一种有效的治疗方法尚存争议。该研究的目的是确定在姑息治疗设置PCN管插入的结果。方法:本研究在拉合尔Shaukat Khanum纪念癌症医院和研究中心(SKMCH&RC)进行。数据从医院的电子医院信息系统(HIS)中检索。研究时间为2018年1月至2020年12月。我们纳入了在姑息环境下接受经皮肾造口术的患者。结果:共纳入111例患者。肾造瘘时的中位年龄为4915.6岁。男性67例(60.4%),女性44例(39.6%)。术前肌酐中位值为3.3±3.36。单侧肾造瘘71例(63.9%),双侧肾造瘘40例(36.1%)。术后平均肌酐水平为2.52 + 2.80。68例(62.2%)患者症状缓解。75例(67.6%)患者术后未发生任何并发症。在我们的研究中,两种最常见的并发症是脱位(9%)和感染(9%)。结论:即使在IV期癌症患者,PCN也能有效缓解症状和生化反应,但由于这些患者并发症的发生率增加,PCN的益处可能大于风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CAR T-Cell Therapy in Cancer: Balancing Efficacy with Cardiac Toxicity Concerns. Individual-Level Factors that Contribute to Delayed Cervical Cancer Diagnosis among Patients in Kenya; A Hospital-Based Assessment. A Web Application for Predicting Drug Combination Efficacy Using Monotherapy Data and IDACombo. Biophysical and Biological Mechanisms of Tumor Treating Fields in Glioblastoma. Small-Cell Lung Cancer in a Cancer Center in Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1