ABAS-3 – an instrument for assessing adaptive skills in people with an intellectual disability

Anna Prokopiak, Janusz Kirenko
{"title":"ABAS-3 – an instrument for assessing adaptive skills in people with an intellectual disability","authors":"Anna Prokopiak, Janusz Kirenko","doi":"10.31299/hrri.56.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its initial part, the article presents an analysis of the definition of intellectual disability and follows its development over the past half century. In order to diagnose an intellectual disability, it is important not only to demonstrate an overall level of intelligence that is at least two standard deviations below the median score, but also to take into account the concurrent criterion of developmental age. Moreover, as discussed in this article, defining an intellectual disability also requires addressing limitations in adaptive behaviour, i.e. cognitive, social and practical functioning skills. These diagnostic criteria are met by the “Adaptive Behavior Assessment System” (ABAS), published originally in 2000 by Harrison and Oakland. Its third edition came out in 2015. ABAS-based evaluations find a wide variety of uses, including assessing adaptive behaviour of people with intellectual disabilities, diagnosing and classifying disabilities and disorders, documenting and monitoring progress over time, and determining entitlement to disability benefits. The instrument has many strengths, but it also exhibits limitations. For example, comprehensive examination is only possible if the localised adaptations of ABAS are suited for people in the age bracket of 0-89 years. The effective use of this instrument is also dependent on its compatibility with the formal disability assessment system and with the strategies for working with students who have intellectual disabilities. The level of this compatibility should be no less than the American variant. Only then will ABAS-3 be fully adaptable to the purpose for which the assessment is developed, and the results obtained will be useful and properly applied.","PeriodicalId":39824,"journal":{"name":"Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.56.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In its initial part, the article presents an analysis of the definition of intellectual disability and follows its development over the past half century. In order to diagnose an intellectual disability, it is important not only to demonstrate an overall level of intelligence that is at least two standard deviations below the median score, but also to take into account the concurrent criterion of developmental age. Moreover, as discussed in this article, defining an intellectual disability also requires addressing limitations in adaptive behaviour, i.e. cognitive, social and practical functioning skills. These diagnostic criteria are met by the “Adaptive Behavior Assessment System” (ABAS), published originally in 2000 by Harrison and Oakland. Its third edition came out in 2015. ABAS-based evaluations find a wide variety of uses, including assessing adaptive behaviour of people with intellectual disabilities, diagnosing and classifying disabilities and disorders, documenting and monitoring progress over time, and determining entitlement to disability benefits. The instrument has many strengths, but it also exhibits limitations. For example, comprehensive examination is only possible if the localised adaptations of ABAS are suited for people in the age bracket of 0-89 years. The effective use of this instrument is also dependent on its compatibility with the formal disability assessment system and with the strategies for working with students who have intellectual disabilities. The level of this compatibility should be no less than the American variant. Only then will ABAS-3 be fully adaptable to the purpose for which the assessment is developed, and the results obtained will be useful and properly applied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ABAS-3 -一种评估智障人士适应技能的工具
文章的第一部分分析了智力残疾的定义,并回顾了半个世纪以来智力残疾的发展历程。为了诊断智力残疾,重要的是不仅要证明智力的总体水平至少比中位数低两个标准差,而且要考虑到发育年龄的并发标准。此外,正如本文所讨论的,定义智力残疾还需要解决适应性行为的局限性,即认知、社会和实际功能技能。这些诊断标准符合“适应行为评估系统”(ABAS),最初由哈里森和奥克兰于2000年出版。第三版于2015年出版。基于abas的评估有各种各样的用途,包括评估智障人士的适应性行为,诊断和分类残疾和障碍,记录和监测长期进展,以及确定获得残疾福利的权利。这一工具有许多优点,但也有其局限性。例如,只有当ABAS的局部适应适合0-89岁年龄段的人群时,才有可能进行全面检查。有效利用这一工具还取决于它是否符合正式的残疾评估制度,以及是否符合与智障学生合作的策略。这种兼容性的水平应该不低于美国的变体。只有这样,ABAS-3才能完全适应制定评估的目的,所获得的结果将是有用的和适当的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja
Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja, sljednik časopisa Defektologija, objavljuje radove iz područja edukacijsko-rehabilitacijskih, biomedicinskih, humanističkih, te drugih društvenih znanosti, kao i različitih područja umjetnosti povezanih s pitanjima prevencije, dijagnostike i procjene, tretmana i sveobuhvatne podrške u zajednici za osobe s posebnim potrebama i poremećajima u ponašanju. Primarno je usmjerena na objavljivanje suvremenih znanstvenih i stručnih spoznaja.
期刊最新文献
Functionality and social support as aspects of quality of life in elderly stroke patients Perspectives of mothers on the quality of life of children with epidermolysis bullosa and their parent Zadovoljstvo i školski uspjeh učenika koji se školuju po redovnom programu uz individualizirane postupke Exploratory study of spoken and sign language comprehension among Deaf and Hard-of-hearing adults in Slovenia Characteristics and parental viewpoints regarding digital device use in children aged 4 to 8 years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1