One World, Rival Theories

Q4 Social Sciences Foreign Policy Pub Date : 2004-11-01 DOI:10.2307/4152944
Jack Snyder
{"title":"One World, Rival Theories","authors":"Jack Snyder","doi":"10.2307/4152944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he U.S. government has endured several painful rounds of scrutiny as it tries to figure out what went wrong on Sept. 11, 2001. The intelligence community faces radical restructuring; the military has made a sharp pivot to face a new enemy; and a vast new federal agency has blossomed to coordinate homeland security. But did September 11 signal a failure of theory on par with the failures of intelligence and policy? Familiar theories about how the world works still dominate academic debate. Instead of radical","PeriodicalId":35823,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/4152944","citationCount":"195","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4152944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 195

Abstract

he U.S. government has endured several painful rounds of scrutiny as it tries to figure out what went wrong on Sept. 11, 2001. The intelligence community faces radical restructuring; the military has made a sharp pivot to face a new enemy; and a vast new federal agency has blossomed to coordinate homeland security. But did September 11 signal a failure of theory on par with the failures of intelligence and policy? Familiar theories about how the world works still dominate academic debate. Instead of radical
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同一个世界,对立的理论
为了找出2001年9月11日到底出了什么问题,美国政府经历了几轮痛苦的审查。情报界面临着彻底的重组;军队已经做出了一个尖锐的转向,以面对新的敌人;一个庞大的新联邦机构已经成立,以协调国土安全。但是,9·11是否意味着理论的失败,就像情报和政策的失败一样?关于世界如何运转的熟悉理论仍然主导着学术辩论。而不是激进
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1918, the mission of the Foreign Policy Association today, as it has been throughout its 95-year history, is to serve as a catalyst for developing awareness, understanding, and informed opinion on U.S. foreign policy and global issues. Through its balanced, nonpartisan programs and publications, the FPA encourages citizens to participate in the foreign policy process.
期刊最新文献
The New Decade The Disinformation Age Lines of resistance From the Shores of Tripoli The dinosaur hunter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1