To Publication History of Nikolai I. Kareev’s Brochure “Southern Slavs and Italy on the Adriatic”

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY Herald of an Archivist Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-172-183
I. Bogomolov
{"title":"To Publication History of Nikolai I. Kareev’s Brochure “Southern Slavs and Italy on the Adriatic”","authors":"I. Bogomolov","doi":"10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-172-183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article publishes correspondence concerning publication of a pamphlet by the famous Russian historian, Nikolai Ivanovich Kareev (1850–1931) “Southern Slavs and Italy on the Adriatic.” It was to be published in the series “World War and Slavic Questions.” The compilers intended the series to increase the knowledge in the Russian society about the “Slavic question” and its prospects after the war. In particular, they supported the idea of uniting the Czechs and Slovaks into a Czechoslovak state and expanding the borders of Serbia, both at the expense of Austro-Hungarian territories. Kareev held to a similar point of view in his brochure, based primarily on historical facts. Written in the summer of 1916, this work reflected his views on the course of the war and the future post-war world order. In the question of the fate of Austrian Istria and Dalmatia, Kareev actually supported the Serbian side, seeing no reason for Italy to acquire these lands after the victory over the Central Powers. At the stage of censoring, the essay encountered some obstacles. According to the existing procedure, the Petrograd Committee for Press Affairs (which also dealt with military censorship) sent essays on foreign policy topics to the Press and Information Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for review. In August 1916, Kareev’s manuscript was received there. After reviewing it, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Anatoly Neratov advised to postpone the publication of the brochure, as it raised difficult questions and might have caused discontent of Italian allies of Russia. The manuscript was “stuck” in the censorship committee for two months, and Kareev tried to solve the problem by contacting the head of the Second Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, baron Boris Nolde, who, in his turn, advised him to write a personal letter to Neratov. In his letter, Kareev assured Neratov that there was nothing “offensive” in the brochure; it was written in “objectively scientific” language; the facts had been published and discussed not only in England and France, but also in Italy. Kareev also asked Neratov for a personal meeting to convey his arguments. It is possible that the meeting actually took place, because a week later the director of the Press and Information Department, Alexander Lysakovsky, informed the chairman of the Petrograd Press Committee, Nikolai Levitsky, that the Foreign Ministry no longer had any complaints against Kareev’s brochure and it could be published. The published documents show the mechanism of censoring essays on foreign policy topics in Russia during the First World War. In addition, N.I. Kareev’s letter is now introduced into scientific use, supplementing his extensive epistolary legacy.","PeriodicalId":41551,"journal":{"name":"Herald of an Archivist","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of an Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2023-1-172-183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article publishes correspondence concerning publication of a pamphlet by the famous Russian historian, Nikolai Ivanovich Kareev (1850–1931) “Southern Slavs and Italy on the Adriatic.” It was to be published in the series “World War and Slavic Questions.” The compilers intended the series to increase the knowledge in the Russian society about the “Slavic question” and its prospects after the war. In particular, they supported the idea of uniting the Czechs and Slovaks into a Czechoslovak state and expanding the borders of Serbia, both at the expense of Austro-Hungarian territories. Kareev held to a similar point of view in his brochure, based primarily on historical facts. Written in the summer of 1916, this work reflected his views on the course of the war and the future post-war world order. In the question of the fate of Austrian Istria and Dalmatia, Kareev actually supported the Serbian side, seeing no reason for Italy to acquire these lands after the victory over the Central Powers. At the stage of censoring, the essay encountered some obstacles. According to the existing procedure, the Petrograd Committee for Press Affairs (which also dealt with military censorship) sent essays on foreign policy topics to the Press and Information Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for review. In August 1916, Kareev’s manuscript was received there. After reviewing it, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Anatoly Neratov advised to postpone the publication of the brochure, as it raised difficult questions and might have caused discontent of Italian allies of Russia. The manuscript was “stuck” in the censorship committee for two months, and Kareev tried to solve the problem by contacting the head of the Second Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, baron Boris Nolde, who, in his turn, advised him to write a personal letter to Neratov. In his letter, Kareev assured Neratov that there was nothing “offensive” in the brochure; it was written in “objectively scientific” language; the facts had been published and discussed not only in England and France, but also in Italy. Kareev also asked Neratov for a personal meeting to convey his arguments. It is possible that the meeting actually took place, because a week later the director of the Press and Information Department, Alexander Lysakovsky, informed the chairman of the Petrograd Press Committee, Nikolai Levitsky, that the Foreign Ministry no longer had any complaints against Kareev’s brochure and it could be published. The published documents show the mechanism of censoring essays on foreign policy topics in Russia during the First World War. In addition, N.I. Kareev’s letter is now introduced into scientific use, supplementing his extensive epistolary legacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼古拉·卡列夫小册子《亚得里亚海上的南方斯拉夫人与意大利》的出版史
这篇文章发表了关于俄罗斯著名历史学家尼古拉·伊万诺维奇·卡列夫(1850-1931)出版的小册子《亚得里亚海上的南方斯拉夫人和意大利》的通信。它将在“世界大战和斯拉夫问题”系列中发表。编纂者的目的是增加俄罗斯社会对“斯拉夫问题”及其战后前景的认识。特别是,他们支持将捷克人和斯洛伐克人统一为一个捷克斯洛伐克国家,并扩大塞尔维亚的边界,这两种想法都是以奥匈帝国的领土为代价的。Kareev在他的小册子中也持有类似的观点,主要基于历史事实。这部作品写于1916年夏天,反映了他对战争进程和未来战后世界秩序的看法。在奥地利伊斯特里亚和达尔马提亚的命运问题上,卡里耶夫实际上支持塞尔维亚一方,认为意大利在战胜同盟国后没有理由获得这些土地。在审查阶段,文章遇到了一些障碍。根据现行程序,彼得格勒新闻事务委员会(也负责军事审查)将有关外交政策的文章送交外交部新闻和信息司审查。1916年8月,克莱耶夫的手稿在那里收到。外交部副部长阿纳托利·涅拉托夫在审查后建议推迟小册子的出版,因为它提出了困难的问题,并可能引起俄罗斯盟友意大利的不满。稿子被审查委员会“卡住”了两个月,卡列夫试图通过联系外交部第二司司长鲍里斯·诺尔德男爵来解决这个问题,诺尔德男爵建议他写一封私人信件给涅拉托夫。在信中,克莱耶夫向涅拉托夫保证,宣传册中没有任何“冒犯”的内容;它是用“客观科学”的语言写的;这些事实不仅在英国和法国,而且在意大利也被公布和讨论。克莱耶夫还要求内拉托夫私下会面,以传达他的观点。会议可能真的举行了,因为一周后,新闻和信息部主任亚历山大·莱萨科夫斯基通知彼得格勒新闻委员会主席尼古拉·莱维茨基,外交部对卡列夫的小册子不再有任何不满,可以出版。公开的文件显示了第一次世界大战期间俄罗斯对外交政策主题文章的审查机制。此外,Kareev的信件现在被引入科学用途,补充了他广泛的书信遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
On Oddity of the Left Socialist Revolutionaries Uprising in the Zhizdra Uezd of the Kaluga Gubernia, July 7–14, 1918: A Source Studies Aspect Sheremetevs’ Gifts to the Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery in the 16th Century From the History of the Crimean Muslims Taxation in the 19th Century: The “Tatar Levy,” Details of Preparation, Collection, and Distribution: Materials from the Russian State Historical Archive New Documents on the Finnish Occupation of the Olonets Region of Karelia in 1941–44 Sacralization of the Portrait of the Empress Elizabeth Petrovna in the Orenburg Gubernia in the 1760s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1