Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: Are They Inefficient?

IF 1.4 Q3 ECONOMICS CHINESE ECONOMY Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI:10.2753/CES1097-1475470504.2014.11082916
Shaomin Li, Y. Lin, David D. Selover
{"title":"Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: Are They Inefficient?","authors":"Shaomin Li, Y. Lin, David D. Selover","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475470504.2014.11082916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using a panel data set of 200,000+ Chinese firms constructed by merging the Chinese census of manufacturing firms for 2000–2005, we compare the performance of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private firms in terms of rates of return, productivity, growth, costs, and investment. Using panel regressions, we find that Chinese industrial state-owned enterprises are, indeed, less efficient than private firms and pay less attention to costs, inventories, accounts receivables, investment, employee welfare, financing, and administration. We find that this adversely affects their performance. The findings are consistent with the soft-budget constraint hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475470504.2014.11082916","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHINESE ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475470504.2014.11082916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Abstract Using a panel data set of 200,000+ Chinese firms constructed by merging the Chinese census of manufacturing firms for 2000–2005, we compare the performance of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private firms in terms of rates of return, productivity, growth, costs, and investment. Using panel regressions, we find that Chinese industrial state-owned enterprises are, indeed, less efficient than private firms and pay less attention to costs, inventories, accounts receivables, investment, employee welfare, financing, and administration. We find that this adversely affects their performance. The findings are consistent with the soft-budget constraint hypothesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国国有企业效率低下吗?
摘要利用2000-2005年中国制造业企业普查数据构建的20多万家中国企业面板数据集,比较了中国国有企业和民营企业在回报率、生产率、增长、成本和投资等方面的表现。通过面板回归,我们发现中国工业国有企业的效率确实低于私营企业,并且不太关注成本、库存、应收账款、投资、员工福利、融资和管理。我们发现这对他们的表现有不利影响。研究结果与软预算约束假说一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CHINESE ECONOMY
CHINESE ECONOMY ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Chinese Economy offers an objective and analytical perspective on economic issues concerning China. It features research papers by scholars from around the world as well as selected translations of important articles from Chinese sources. The journal aims to provide expert insight on China"s economic development and directions for future research and policy analysis.
期刊最新文献
New Markets and Current Economy China’s Charitable Foundations: Development and Policy-Related Issues IPO Performance on China’s Newest Stock Market (ChiNext) China and the WTO: Will the Market Economy Status Make Any Difference after 2016? Social Impetus, Economic Roots, and Political Logic: China’s Transformation Through the Lens of American History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1