Quantification of Radionuclide Migration Parameters in Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal: Review on the Use of Expert Elicitation

R. Nakabayashi, D. Sugiyama
{"title":"Quantification of Radionuclide Migration Parameters in Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal: Review on the Use of Expert Elicitation","authors":"R. Nakabayashi, D. Sugiyama","doi":"10.3327/taesj.j19.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expert elicitation has traditionally been accepted in some countries as a way to quantify the uncertainty of radionuclide migration parameters in the safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal. However, expert elicitation has not yet been explicitly performed in the field of radioactive waste disposal in Japan. To discuss the applicability of expert elicitation in Japan, here we broadly review the histories and methodologies of expert elicitation in some papers and review in more detail case studies on the utilization of expert elicitation in the safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal in the US, UK, and Sweden. From the literature review, we suggest that it is valuable to adopt expert elicitation to quantify the uncertainty of parameters in Japan. In particular, the documentation of each elicitation step is critical to ensuring the traceability and transparency of expert elicitation. The documentation enables the regulator to evaluate whether the expert judgment including the elicitation process is adequate. Furthermore, we recommend providing not only an aggregated expert judgment for safety assessment but also the distribution of individual expert judgements. Individual expert judgments will be used for related analyses (e.g., sensitivity or uncertainty analyses), leading to increased confidence in the safety assessment.","PeriodicalId":55893,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3327/taesj.j19.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expert elicitation has traditionally been accepted in some countries as a way to quantify the uncertainty of radionuclide migration parameters in the safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal. However, expert elicitation has not yet been explicitly performed in the field of radioactive waste disposal in Japan. To discuss the applicability of expert elicitation in Japan, here we broadly review the histories and methodologies of expert elicitation in some papers and review in more detail case studies on the utilization of expert elicitation in the safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal in the US, UK, and Sweden. From the literature review, we suggest that it is valuable to adopt expert elicitation to quantify the uncertainty of parameters in Japan. In particular, the documentation of each elicitation step is critical to ensuring the traceability and transparency of expert elicitation. The documentation enables the regulator to evaluate whether the expert judgment including the elicitation process is adequate. Furthermore, we recommend providing not only an aggregated expert judgment for safety assessment but also the distribution of individual expert judgements. Individual expert judgments will be used for related analyses (e.g., sensitivity or uncertainty analyses), leading to increased confidence in the safety assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射性废物处置安全评价中放射性核素迁移参数的量化:专家启发法的应用综述
一些国家传统上接受专家引导法作为在放射性废物处置安全评估中量化放射性核素迁移参数的不确定性的一种方法。但是,在日本尚未明确开展放射性废物处理领域的专家征集工作。为了讨论专家引导法在日本的适用性,我们在这里大致回顾了一些论文中专家引导法的历史和方法,并更详细地回顾了美国、英国和瑞典在放射性废物处置安全评估中使用专家引导法的案例研究。从文献回顾来看,我们建议采用专家启发法来量化日本的参数不确定性是有价值的。特别是,每个引出步骤的文档对于确保专家引出的可追溯性和透明度至关重要。该文件使监管机构能够评估专家判断(包括诱导过程)是否足够。此外,我们建议在安全评价中不仅要提供一个综合的专家判断,还要提供个别专家判断的分布。个别专家判断将用于相关分析(例如,敏感性或不确定性分析),从而增加安全评估的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Transactions of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan Energy-Nuclear Energy and Engineering
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Promotive Effects of Siltfence on Deposition of Suspended Particles: Evaluations of Diffusion Suppression of Radionuclides in Rectangular Open Channel via Numerical Simulations Circulation of Radioactive Cesium in Deciduous Broad-leaved Forests due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident Machine Learning Sintering Density Prediction Model for MOX Fuel Pellet マイナーアクチノイド核変換用窒化物燃料の乾式再処理における崩壊熱の影響 Evaluation of external dose exposure of workers during house demolition and dose reduction work in a difficult-to-return zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1