{"title":"A technical analysis of stone artefacts from Yam Camp surface scatter and rockshelter, S.E. Cape York Peninsula","authors":"W. Pearson","doi":"10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological analyses of stone artefacts in Australia (e.g. Hiscock 1982; 1984; 1989) and more generally (e.g. Flenniken 1985) have yielded insights into prehistoric human behaviour not obtained by analyses which are more typologically oriented. To a large extent, previous work of this sort in S.E. Cape York Peninsula has been of the latter variety and have emphasized formal descriptions of assemblages over behavioural implications of technological change. Nevertheless, major changes in raw material use and artefact size and range have been demonstrated (Flood and Horsfall 1986; Rosenfeld et al 1981; Wright 1971a). By contrast, this paper targets aspects of two site assemblages in this region which were considered capable of yielding information concerning temporal changes in the way people have used stone for flaking. These aspects include raw material and artefact size and form (see Hiscock 1984).","PeriodicalId":37597,"journal":{"name":"Queensland Archaeological Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"91-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/QAR.6.1989.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Technological analyses of stone artefacts in Australia (e.g. Hiscock 1982; 1984; 1989) and more generally (e.g. Flenniken 1985) have yielded insights into prehistoric human behaviour not obtained by analyses which are more typologically oriented. To a large extent, previous work of this sort in S.E. Cape York Peninsula has been of the latter variety and have emphasized formal descriptions of assemblages over behavioural implications of technological change. Nevertheless, major changes in raw material use and artefact size and range have been demonstrated (Flood and Horsfall 1986; Rosenfeld et al 1981; Wright 1971a). By contrast, this paper targets aspects of two site assemblages in this region which were considered capable of yielding information concerning temporal changes in the way people have used stone for flaking. These aspects include raw material and artefact size and form (see Hiscock 1984).
澳大利亚石质文物的技术分析(如Hiscock 1982;1984;1989)和更普遍的(如Flenniken 1985)已经产生了史前人类行为的见解,而不是通过更以类型学为导向的分析获得的。Â在很大程度上,以前在东南约克角半岛进行的这类工作属于后一种类型,并且强调对集合的正式描述,而不是技术变化的行为含义。Â尽管如此,原材料的使用和人工制品的大小和范围已经发生了重大变化(Flood和Horsfall 1986;Rosenfeld et al . 1981;1971年莱特)。Â相比之下,本文的目标是该地区的两个遗址组合,它们被认为能够提供有关人们使用石头剥落方式的时间变化的信息。Â这些方面包括原材料和人工制品的大小和形式(见Hiscock 1984)。
期刊介绍:
Queensland Archaeological Research is a peer-reviewed journal published since 1984 devoted to publishing substantive, original and high-quality archaeological research pertaining to Queensland, Australia and adjacent areas. Data-rich manuscripts are particularly welcome. Queensland Archaeological Research is published in English in one volume each year. Submission of articles to Queensland Archaeological Research is free. Access to articles in Queensland Archaeological Research is free.