Problematics of Democratizing Curatorial Power in the Royal Museum for Central Africa's Online Collection

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 ART Zivot Umjetnosti Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI:10.31664/zu.2020.106.09
H. Kiefer
{"title":"Problematics of Democratizing Curatorial Power in the Royal Museum for Central Africa's Online Collection","authors":"H. Kiefer","doi":"10.31664/zu.2020.106.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What do a nineteenth-century ethnographic exhibit and a twenty-first-century museum website tool have in common? More than one might expect. Belgium’s 1897 International Exposition included a colonial exposition that displayed panoplies and dioramas of items taken under colonial violence in what is today the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These objects came to form the initial collection for Belgium’s Royal Museum for Central Africa, an institution that has in recent years underwent a period of renovation and expansion (reopening in 2018) with the aim of revisiting its history and displays. To create engagement with the museum, its website has offered a feature that allows visitors to curate virtual image boards of objects from the collection, with resulting effects semantically linked to the 1897 Brussels exposition. This online tool, while stemming from an admirable impulse to share curatorial control, falls short by juxtaposing items that tell of traumatic histories with no criticality or contextualizing information. Analyses of visual configurations of this tool, along with comparative examinations of the 1897 displays, offer evidence for this argument, as well as an example of how collections that represent painful histories call for especially thoughtful design of digital, publicfacing tools.","PeriodicalId":41082,"journal":{"name":"Zivot Umjetnosti","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31664/zu.2020.106.09","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zivot Umjetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31664/zu.2020.106.09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What do a nineteenth-century ethnographic exhibit and a twenty-first-century museum website tool have in common? More than one might expect. Belgium’s 1897 International Exposition included a colonial exposition that displayed panoplies and dioramas of items taken under colonial violence in what is today the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These objects came to form the initial collection for Belgium’s Royal Museum for Central Africa, an institution that has in recent years underwent a period of renovation and expansion (reopening in 2018) with the aim of revisiting its history and displays. To create engagement with the museum, its website has offered a feature that allows visitors to curate virtual image boards of objects from the collection, with resulting effects semantically linked to the 1897 Brussels exposition. This online tool, while stemming from an admirable impulse to share curatorial control, falls short by juxtaposing items that tell of traumatic histories with no criticality or contextualizing information. Analyses of visual configurations of this tool, along with comparative examinations of the 1897 displays, offer evidence for this argument, as well as an example of how collections that represent painful histories call for especially thoughtful design of digital, publicfacing tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中非在线馆藏皇家博物馆策展权力民主化的问题
19世纪的人种学展览和21世纪的博物馆网站工具有什么共同之处?超出了人们的预期。比利时1897年的国际博览会包括一个殖民博览会,展示了在今天的刚果民主共和国的殖民暴力下获得的物品的全套装备和立体模型。这些物品构成了比利时中非皇家博物馆的最初收藏,该博物馆近年来经历了一段时间的翻新和扩建(于2018年重新开放),目的是重温其历史和展示。为了与博物馆建立联系,其网站提供了一项功能,允许游客策划馆藏物品的虚拟图像板,其结果效果在语义上与1897年布鲁塞尔博览会联系在一起。这个在线工具虽然源于分享策展控制权的令人钦佩的冲动,但它的不足之处在于,它把讲述创伤历史的物品放在一起,没有批判性或背景信息。对这一工具的视觉配置的分析,以及对1897年展览的比较检查,为这一论点提供了证据,同时也提供了一个例子,说明代表痛苦历史的藏品如何需要特别深思熟虑的数字化、面向公众的工具设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-Based Photographic Archives and “Potential” Histories of the Cold War in Eastern Europe Field notes revisited Bringing Down the “Archive Fever” Archival Transformations and the Value of Photographic Objects Our Photographs, Old and New
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1