Yuequn Dong, T. Lei, Qingwen Zhang, Xiaohui Zhuang, Fangfang Liu
{"title":"Improved accuracy of short-distance measurement of water flow velocity using Pulse Boundary Model","authors":"Yuequn Dong, T. Lei, Qingwen Zhang, Xiaohui Zhuang, Fangfang Liu","doi":"10.3319/TAO.2019.02.07.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Salt tracer is one of the widely used shallow water velocity measurement methods. The Pulse Boundary Model method produces low velocity at short distances from the salt injection position. This study proposes a two-step approach to accu-rately estimate the flow velocity. Experiments were carried out under three flow rates of 12, 24, and 48 L min -1 and three slope gradients of 4, 8, and 12° at six measurement positions of 0.05, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 m from the solute injection positions. The new method obtains peak velocities that are 0.999 times those of the centroid velocities, indicating that either centroid or peak time can be equally used to measure flow velocity. The new method significantly improves measurement accuracy of flow velocity at short distances, as indicated by the almost equal measured velocities at all locations as those measured at longer distances. Velocities measured by the new method were significantly higher than those measured by the Pulse Boundary Model method or the centroid velocities measured by the traditional salt tracer method. In addition, the centroid and the peak velocities obtained by the new method correlates well to those by the traditional volumetric method. The velocities measured by the volumetric method were 0.79 (centroid velocity) and 0.78 (peak velocity) times of those estimated by the new and improved method. The results show that new and improved method provides an accurate and efficient approach in measuring shallow water flow velocity at short distances.","PeriodicalId":22259,"journal":{"name":"Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2019.02.07.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Salt tracer is one of the widely used shallow water velocity measurement methods. The Pulse Boundary Model method produces low velocity at short distances from the salt injection position. This study proposes a two-step approach to accu-rately estimate the flow velocity. Experiments were carried out under three flow rates of 12, 24, and 48 L min -1 and three slope gradients of 4, 8, and 12° at six measurement positions of 0.05, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 m from the solute injection positions. The new method obtains peak velocities that are 0.999 times those of the centroid velocities, indicating that either centroid or peak time can be equally used to measure flow velocity. The new method significantly improves measurement accuracy of flow velocity at short distances, as indicated by the almost equal measured velocities at all locations as those measured at longer distances. Velocities measured by the new method were significantly higher than those measured by the Pulse Boundary Model method or the centroid velocities measured by the traditional salt tracer method. In addition, the centroid and the peak velocities obtained by the new method correlates well to those by the traditional volumetric method. The velocities measured by the volumetric method were 0.79 (centroid velocity) and 0.78 (peak velocity) times of those estimated by the new and improved method. The results show that new and improved method provides an accurate and efficient approach in measuring shallow water flow velocity at short distances.
盐示踪剂是目前应用广泛的浅水测速方法之一。脉冲边界模型方法在离盐注入位置很近的地方产生低速。本研究提出了一种两步法来精确估计流速。实验在距离溶质注入位置0.05、0.3、0.6、0.9、1.2和1.5 m的6个测量位置,以12、24和48 L min -1 3种流速和4、8和12°3个坡度梯度进行。新方法得到的峰值速度是质心速度的0.999倍,表明质心时间和峰值时间都可以用来测量流速。新方法显著提高了近距离流速的测量精度,所有位置的测量速度与较长距离的测量速度几乎相等。新方法测得的速度明显高于脉冲边界模型法或传统盐示踪法测得的质心速度。此外,新方法得到的质心和峰值速度与传统的体积法得到的结果具有较好的相关性。体积法测得的速度是新方法和改进方法测得速度的0.79倍(质心速度)和0.78倍(峰值速度)。结果表明,改进后的新方法为近距离测量浅水流速提供了一种准确、有效的方法。
期刊介绍:
The major publication of the Chinese Geoscience Union (located in Taipei) since 1990, the journal of Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (TAO) publishes bi-monthly scientific research articles, notes, correspondences and reviews in all disciplines of the Earth sciences. It is the amalgamation of the following journals:
Papers in Meteorological Research (published by the Meteorological Society of the ROC) since Vol. 12, No. 2
Bulletin of Geophysics (published by the Institute of Geophysics, National Central University) since No. 27
Acta Oceanographica Taiwanica (published by the Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University) since Vol. 42.