Evaluation of a broadband sound projected from the gates of a navigation lock in the Mississippi River shows it to be a weak deterrent for common carp and unable to block passage

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Management of Biological Invasions Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3391/mbi.2022.13.1.13
A. Riesgraf, J. Finger, Daniel Zielinski, Clark Dennis III, J. Whitty, Peter Sorensen
{"title":"Evaluation of a broadband sound projected from the gates of a navigation lock in the Mississippi River shows it to be a weak deterrent for common carp and unable to block passage","authors":"A. Riesgraf, J. Finger, Daniel Zielinski, Clark Dennis III, J. Whitty, Peter Sorensen","doi":"10.3391/mbi.2022.13.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an urgent need to block the passage of carp and other invasive fishes through navigational locks in large rivers. Although the broadband sound of an outboard motor has been shown to strongly repel three species of carp in laboratory flumes and to a lesser extent inside of a lock chamber, it has not yet been tested to determineif it can stop carp from entering a lock. To test this possibility, we attached speakers to lock gates and played the sound of an outboard motor while measuring its efficacy by tracking free-ranging transplanted tagged common carp in its vicinity. Eight groups of 20 carp were tested while the sound system was turned on and off for 2 week periods. When the sound system was on, these carp spent approximately one-third less time in front of the lock gates than when it was off; however, when analyzed by a GLMM this effect was shown to be no greater than the effects of river discharge or temperature. Additionally, lock entrance rates were lower, albeit non-significantly, when the sound was off. A number of factors may have contributed to the limited efficacy of this deterrent system including the sound itself.","PeriodicalId":54262,"journal":{"name":"Management of Biological Invasions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2022.13.1.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There is an urgent need to block the passage of carp and other invasive fishes through navigational locks in large rivers. Although the broadband sound of an outboard motor has been shown to strongly repel three species of carp in laboratory flumes and to a lesser extent inside of a lock chamber, it has not yet been tested to determineif it can stop carp from entering a lock. To test this possibility, we attached speakers to lock gates and played the sound of an outboard motor while measuring its efficacy by tracking free-ranging transplanted tagged common carp in its vicinity. Eight groups of 20 carp were tested while the sound system was turned on and off for 2 week periods. When the sound system was on, these carp spent approximately one-third less time in front of the lock gates than when it was off; however, when analyzed by a GLMM this effect was shown to be no greater than the effects of river discharge or temperature. Additionally, lock entrance rates were lower, albeit non-significantly, when the sound was off. A number of factors may have contributed to the limited efficacy of this deterrent system including the sound itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对从密西西比河通航船闸门发射的宽带声音的评估表明,它对普通鲤鱼的威慑作用很弱,无法阻挡通过
目前迫切需要阻止鲤鱼和其他入侵鱼类通过大型河流的通航闸。尽管舷外发动机的宽频声已被证明能在实验室水槽中强烈地驱赶三种鲤鱼,并在较小程度上在船闸舱内驱赶鲤鱼,但尚未进行测试,以确定它是否能阻止鲤鱼进入船闸。为了测试这种可能性,我们在锁门上安装了扬声器,并播放了舷外马达的声音,同时通过跟踪附近自由放养的移植了标签的普通鲤鱼来测量它的效果。8组20条鲤鱼在打开和关闭音响系统的情况下进行了为期2周的测试。当音响系统打开时,这些鲤鱼在闸门前停留的时间比关闭时减少了大约三分之一;然而,当通过GLMM分析时,这种影响显示不大于河流流量或温度的影响。此外,当声音关闭时,锁门率较低,尽管没有显著性。包括声音本身在内的许多因素可能导致这种威慑系统的效力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Management of Biological Invasions
Management of Biological Invasions Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Management of Biological Invasions, established in 2010 by Dr. Elias Dana, is an open access, peer-reviewed international journal focusing on applied research in biological invasions in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems from around the world. This journal is devoted to bridging the gap between scientific research and the use of science in decision-making, regulation and management in the area of invasive species introduction and biodiversity conservation. Managing biological invasions is a crisis science, with Management of Biological Invasions aiming to provide insights to the issues, to document new forms of detection, measurements and analysis, and to document tangible solutions to this problem. In addition to original research on applied issues, Management of Biological Invasions publishes technical reports on new management technologies of invasive species and also the proceedings of relevant international meetings. As a platform to encourage informed discussion on matters of national and international importance, we publish viewpoint papers that highlight emerging issues, showcase initiatives, and present opinions of leading researchers.
期刊最新文献
Opinions of North American aquatic invasive species managers about potential Buddhist life release practices Mussel squeeze: dissolved oxygen and temperature can “squeeze” zebra mussels out of invaded reservoirs eDNA-based detection as an early warning tool for detecting established and emerging invasive amphipods Applying the Extended Parallel Process Model to aquatic invasive species prevention behaviors in wading anglers Resistance to desiccation and healing regeneration in the sun coral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1