Field test of an electric deterrence and guidance system during a natural spawning migration of invasive common carp

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Management of Biological Invasions Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3391/mbi.2022.13.1.12
P. Bajer, Peter J. Hundt, Emil Kukulski, Matthew J. Kocian
{"title":"Field test of an electric deterrence and guidance system during a natural spawning migration of invasive common carp","authors":"P. Bajer, Peter J. Hundt, Emil Kukulski, Matthew J. Kocian","doi":"10.3391/mbi.2022.13.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-physical deterrence and guidance technologies are sought after for management of invasive fish, but they have rarely been tested in the field during natural fish migrations. We tested the efficacy of a semi-portable deterrence and guidance system (DGS) that used vertical electrodes producing low-voltage electric field to deter the upstream spawning migration of common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) and direct them into a trap (5 m by 25 m enclosure with a net) in a natural stream. The behavior of carp was monitored using Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags and antennas. The migration began on 7 April 2019, when water temperature was 5 °C and lasted through May 2019. Performance of the DGS was evaluated during three separate periods, between which the DGS was briefly deactivated. During the first period (4/7–4/19), 559 unique carp challenged the DGS. Of those, 10 were able to cross the DGS (98.2% efficacy), 234 (41.8%) were directed into the trap and 54 were captured. The mean number of days each carp was detected at the DGS was 2.6. During the second period (4/25–5/7), 562 unique PIT carp challenged the DGS. Of those, 24 were able to cross it (95.8% efficacy), 241 (42.9%) were directed into the trap and 148 were captured. Mean time at the DGS was 5.6 days. During the third period (5/7–5/15), 147 PIT carp challenged the DGS and 2 were able to cross it (98.6% efficiency). The mean time at the DGS was 5.5 days. Due to decreasing numbers of carp during the third period, we did not attempt to direct them into the trap for removal. Stream discharge during our test exceeded the 11-year average by 2–3 times; the floodplain was periodically flooded, and it is possible that some carp migrated around the DGS rather than through it. Overall, our results suggest that DGS that generate mild, electric field can be useful in deterring seasonal migrations of common carp and facilitating new removal strategies. The semi-portable nature of the system and low site-engineering requirements allow for rapid deployments and targeted applications during seasonal migrations.","PeriodicalId":54262,"journal":{"name":"Management of Biological Invasions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2022.13.1.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Non-physical deterrence and guidance technologies are sought after for management of invasive fish, but they have rarely been tested in the field during natural fish migrations. We tested the efficacy of a semi-portable deterrence and guidance system (DGS) that used vertical electrodes producing low-voltage electric field to deter the upstream spawning migration of common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) and direct them into a trap (5 m by 25 m enclosure with a net) in a natural stream. The behavior of carp was monitored using Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags and antennas. The migration began on 7 April 2019, when water temperature was 5 °C and lasted through May 2019. Performance of the DGS was evaluated during three separate periods, between which the DGS was briefly deactivated. During the first period (4/7–4/19), 559 unique carp challenged the DGS. Of those, 10 were able to cross the DGS (98.2% efficacy), 234 (41.8%) were directed into the trap and 54 were captured. The mean number of days each carp was detected at the DGS was 2.6. During the second period (4/25–5/7), 562 unique PIT carp challenged the DGS. Of those, 24 were able to cross it (95.8% efficacy), 241 (42.9%) were directed into the trap and 148 were captured. Mean time at the DGS was 5.6 days. During the third period (5/7–5/15), 147 PIT carp challenged the DGS and 2 were able to cross it (98.6% efficiency). The mean time at the DGS was 5.5 days. Due to decreasing numbers of carp during the third period, we did not attempt to direct them into the trap for removal. Stream discharge during our test exceeded the 11-year average by 2–3 times; the floodplain was periodically flooded, and it is possible that some carp migrated around the DGS rather than through it. Overall, our results suggest that DGS that generate mild, electric field can be useful in deterring seasonal migrations of common carp and facilitating new removal strategies. The semi-portable nature of the system and low site-engineering requirements allow for rapid deployments and targeted applications during seasonal migrations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入侵鲤鱼自然产卵洄游过程中电阻导系统的现场试验
非物理威慑和引导技术是对入侵鱼类管理的追求,但很少在鱼类自然洄游期间进行实地试验。我们测试了半便携式威慑和引导系统(DGS)的有效性,该系统使用垂直电极产生低压电场来阻止鲤鱼(Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758)的上游产卵迁移,并将它们引导到自然溪流中的陷阱(5米x25米的带有网的围栏)中。采用无源集成应答器(PIT)标签和天线监测鲤鱼的行为。迁移开始于2019年4月7日,当时水温为5°C,并持续到2019年5月。DGS的性能在三个不同的时间段进行评估,在这三个时间段之间,DGS被短暂停用。在第一阶段(4/7 ~ 4/19),559条独特的鲤鱼向DGS发起挑战。其中,能穿过DGS的10只(有效率为98.2%),诱捕234只(有效率为41.8%),捕获54只。在DGS中,每条鲤鱼的平均检测天数为2.6天。在第二阶段(4/25 ~ 5/7),562条独特的PIT鲤向DGS发起挑战。其中24只(有效率95.8%)能穿过,241只(有效率42.9%)被诱捕,148只被捕获。在DGS的平均时间为5.6天。第3期(5/7 ~ 5/15),147条PIT鲤向DGS发起挑战,2条成功通过,成功率为98.6%。在DGS的平均时间为5.5 d。由于第三期鲤鱼数量减少,我们没有试图将它们引导到陷阱中去除。在我们的测试中,河流流量超过了11年平均值的2-3倍;河漫滩周期性地被洪水淹没,有可能一些鲤鱼绕过DGS而不是通过它迁移。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,产生温和电场的DGS在阻止鲤鱼的季节性迁徙和促进新的清除策略方面是有用的。系统的半便携性和低站点工程要求允许在季节性迁移期间快速部署和有针对性的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Management of Biological Invasions
Management of Biological Invasions Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Management of Biological Invasions, established in 2010 by Dr. Elias Dana, is an open access, peer-reviewed international journal focusing on applied research in biological invasions in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems from around the world. This journal is devoted to bridging the gap between scientific research and the use of science in decision-making, regulation and management in the area of invasive species introduction and biodiversity conservation. Managing biological invasions is a crisis science, with Management of Biological Invasions aiming to provide insights to the issues, to document new forms of detection, measurements and analysis, and to document tangible solutions to this problem. In addition to original research on applied issues, Management of Biological Invasions publishes technical reports on new management technologies of invasive species and also the proceedings of relevant international meetings. As a platform to encourage informed discussion on matters of national and international importance, we publish viewpoint papers that highlight emerging issues, showcase initiatives, and present opinions of leading researchers.
期刊最新文献
Opinions of North American aquatic invasive species managers about potential Buddhist life release practices Mussel squeeze: dissolved oxygen and temperature can “squeeze” zebra mussels out of invaded reservoirs eDNA-based detection as an early warning tool for detecting established and emerging invasive amphipods Applying the Extended Parallel Process Model to aquatic invasive species prevention behaviors in wading anglers Resistance to desiccation and healing regeneration in the sun coral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1