Caregiver-Infant Interaction Quality: A Review of Observational Assessment Tools

P. Tryphonopoulos, N. Letourneau, E. Ditommaso
{"title":"Caregiver-Infant Interaction Quality: A Review of Observational Assessment Tools","authors":"P. Tryphonopoulos, N. Letourneau, E. Ditommaso","doi":"10.3109/01460862.2015.1134720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The relationship between caregiver and infant interaction quality and infant developmental outcomes has long been established. As children mature, problems stemming from troubled caregiver-infant relations may result in referral to mental health, early intervention, or child protection services. The accurate and appropriate assessment of caregiver-infant interaction is critical for early recognition of problematic relations and for informing suitable treatment modalities. Evaluating the quality of the caregiver-infant relationship poses a challenge for researchers and clinicians seeking to explore the association between infant development and the quality of early caregiving experiences. This paper describes and compares commonly used measures of caregiver-infant interaction, including the Parent-Child Interaction Scales, Mutual Regulation Scales, Parent-Child Early Relationship Assessment, Mother-Infant Communication Screening, Ainsworth Maternal Sensitivity Scales, Maternal Behavior Q-sort, and the Emotional Availability Scales.","PeriodicalId":45903,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/01460862.2015.1134720","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2015.1134720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT The relationship between caregiver and infant interaction quality and infant developmental outcomes has long been established. As children mature, problems stemming from troubled caregiver-infant relations may result in referral to mental health, early intervention, or child protection services. The accurate and appropriate assessment of caregiver-infant interaction is critical for early recognition of problematic relations and for informing suitable treatment modalities. Evaluating the quality of the caregiver-infant relationship poses a challenge for researchers and clinicians seeking to explore the association between infant development and the quality of early caregiving experiences. This paper describes and compares commonly used measures of caregiver-infant interaction, including the Parent-Child Interaction Scales, Mutual Regulation Scales, Parent-Child Early Relationship Assessment, Mother-Infant Communication Screening, Ainsworth Maternal Sensitivity Scales, Maternal Behavior Q-sort, and the Emotional Availability Scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
照顾者-婴儿互动质量:观察性评估工具综述
照料者与婴儿互动质量与婴儿发育结局之间的关系早已确立。随着儿童的成熟,照料者与婴儿关系的问题可能导致转介到心理健康、早期干预或儿童保护服务机构。准确和适当地评估照顾者与婴儿之间的相互作用,对于及早发现有问题的关系和告知适当的治疗方式至关重要。评估照顾者-婴儿关系的质量,对寻求探索婴儿发育与早期照顾经历质量之间关系的研究人员和临床医生提出了挑战。本文描述和比较了常用的照顾者-婴儿互动量表,包括亲子互动量表,相互调节量表,亲子早期关系评估,母婴沟通筛选,安斯沃思母亲敏感性量表,母亲行为q -排序和情绪可得性量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The Covid-19 Pandemic’s Forgotten Children A Compass for Nursing Specialty Professional Development Development of a Foundation Protocol for Feeding Complex Care Neonates and Enablers and Barriers to Its Implementation Can a Measles Epidemic Be Avoided in 2022? Why Should the Welfare of Therapy Animals Involved in Animal Assisted Interventions Matter to Child Healthcare Researchers and Professionals?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1