Reperfusion injury in brain stroke

Sabrina Rahman, Md Moshiur Rahman
{"title":"Reperfusion injury in brain stroke","authors":"Sabrina Rahman, Md Moshiur Rahman","doi":"10.33962/roneuro-2021-080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The occlusion of a cerebral artery by a thrombus accounts for about 80% of strokes. Reperfusion can save hypoperfused brain tissue from early cerebral blood flow restoration (CBF), thus limiting neurological impairment. The most successful treatments for stroke care have proven to be reperfusion techniques. One of the key drawbacks of these treatment methods is that early ischemic brain tissue reperfusion can lead to adverse effects, including blood-brain barrier breakdown, which can lead to cerebral oedema, haemorrhage of the brain, or both. Haemorrhages are especially devastating after reperfusion and are associated with exceptionally high morbidity and mortality. Fear of haemorrhage-related reperfusion greatly restricts the use of stroke therapies. Reperfusion injury, a mechanism that further damages brain cells, the ischemic arterial wall, and the microvasculature, is due to the deleterious effects of early restoration of cerebral blood flow following stroke. It seems clear that the brain will benefit from therapies to restore CBF to an ischemic region. The brain's reliance on normal CBF levels is underlined by the sensitivity of the brain to relatively short ischaemic cycles. Experimental and clinical data, however, suggests that tissue damage can be aggravated by organ reperfusion. [1] Studies have failed to prove that infarct size is increased by reperfusion. Reperfusion can aggravate the formation of oedema and lead to abnormal blood flow patterns and microvascular lesions within the reperfused areas.","PeriodicalId":30188,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2021-080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The occlusion of a cerebral artery by a thrombus accounts for about 80% of strokes. Reperfusion can save hypoperfused brain tissue from early cerebral blood flow restoration (CBF), thus limiting neurological impairment. The most successful treatments for stroke care have proven to be reperfusion techniques. One of the key drawbacks of these treatment methods is that early ischemic brain tissue reperfusion can lead to adverse effects, including blood-brain barrier breakdown, which can lead to cerebral oedema, haemorrhage of the brain, or both. Haemorrhages are especially devastating after reperfusion and are associated with exceptionally high morbidity and mortality. Fear of haemorrhage-related reperfusion greatly restricts the use of stroke therapies. Reperfusion injury, a mechanism that further damages brain cells, the ischemic arterial wall, and the microvasculature, is due to the deleterious effects of early restoration of cerebral blood flow following stroke. It seems clear that the brain will benefit from therapies to restore CBF to an ischemic region. The brain's reliance on normal CBF levels is underlined by the sensitivity of the brain to relatively short ischaemic cycles. Experimental and clinical data, however, suggests that tissue damage can be aggravated by organ reperfusion. [1] Studies have failed to prove that infarct size is increased by reperfusion. Reperfusion can aggravate the formation of oedema and lead to abnormal blood flow patterns and microvascular lesions within the reperfused areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中再灌注损伤
脑动脉血栓阻塞约占中风的80%。再灌注可以挽救早期脑血流恢复(CBF)的低灌注脑组织,从而限制神经功能损害。最成功的治疗中风护理已被证明是再灌注技术。这些治疗方法的主要缺点之一是,早期缺血脑组织再灌注可能导致不良反应,包括血脑屏障破坏,这可能导致脑水肿、脑出血,或两者兼而有之。再灌注后出血尤其具有破坏性,并伴有极高的发病率和死亡率。对出血相关再灌注的恐惧极大地限制了卒中治疗的使用。再灌注损伤是一种进一步损害脑细胞、缺血性动脉壁和微血管的机制,是由于中风后早期脑血流恢复的有害影响。似乎很明显,大脑将受益于将CBF恢复到缺血区域的治疗。大脑对相对较短的缺血周期的敏感性强调了大脑对正常脑血流水平的依赖。然而,实验和临床数据表明,器官再灌注可加重组织损伤。研究未能证明再灌注会增加梗死面积。再灌注可加重水肿的形成,导致血流模式异常和再灌注区微血管病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Similarities and differences between two coincidently gravitational bullet cases Role of extent of resection on the survival of glioblastoma multiforme Management of brain aneurysm neck-avulsion during clipping surgery A giant A4-A5 distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm treated with microsurgical clip reconstruction Sellar hematoma as a new potential radiological clue for superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm rupture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1