The Choice of Optimally Necessary Devices for Endovascular Treatment of Coarctation of the Aorta

B. Cherpak, Nataliia S. Yaschuk, Y. V. Yermolovych, Oleksandr S. Golovenko, Yuri Panichkin
{"title":"The Choice of Optimally Necessary Devices for Endovascular Treatment of Coarctation of the Aorta","authors":"B. Cherpak, Nataliia S. Yaschuk, Y. V. Yermolovych, Oleksandr S. Golovenko, Yuri Panichkin","doi":"10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(04)/cy062-6672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim. To determine the optimally necessary devices for endovascular stenting of coarctation of the aorta (CoA), considering the anatomical features of the defect and the age of the patient. \nMaterials and methods. Examination and endovascular treatment of 189 patients aged 5 to 60 years with CoA of different anatomical and morphological variants was performed. \nResults and discussion. We presented the clinical features of different anatomical andmorphological variants of CoA. Endovascular treatment of CoA with stenting is considered the best method for adolescents and adults, due to the lower risk of aneurysm formation compared to balloon angioplasty. We were able to successfully reduce the invasive pressure gradient in patients of different ages and to establish dependence of the frequency of complications on the type of the stent used. There were no cases of in-hospital death. The effectiveness of the intervention was 99.4 %. All the patients were discharged from the hospital in good condition 3-7 days (3.3 ± 1.9 days) after the procedure. Currently, 95.7 % are being followed up. During the 5-year follow-up period, 1 patient died due to concomitant heart failure, heart rhythm disturbances (atrial fibrillation) and mitral insufficiency. There were 10.1 % patients (n = 19) with complications: 4.9 % (n = 4) with open-cell stents, 12.1 % (n = 13) with closed-cell stents, 2.2 % (n = 4) with stent-grafts, 7.9 % (n = 16) with uncovered stents. The frequency of reinterventions was 45.0 % in patients older than 25 years, 37.2 % in those aged 5-18 years and 17.6 % in those aged 19-25 years. \nConclusions. The choice of optimally necessary devices for endovascular stenting of the aorta is recommended to be carried out considering the anatomical features of the defect and the age of the patient.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(04)/cy062-6672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim. To determine the optimally necessary devices for endovascular stenting of coarctation of the aorta (CoA), considering the anatomical features of the defect and the age of the patient. Materials and methods. Examination and endovascular treatment of 189 patients aged 5 to 60 years with CoA of different anatomical and morphological variants was performed. Results and discussion. We presented the clinical features of different anatomical andmorphological variants of CoA. Endovascular treatment of CoA with stenting is considered the best method for adolescents and adults, due to the lower risk of aneurysm formation compared to balloon angioplasty. We were able to successfully reduce the invasive pressure gradient in patients of different ages and to establish dependence of the frequency of complications on the type of the stent used. There were no cases of in-hospital death. The effectiveness of the intervention was 99.4 %. All the patients were discharged from the hospital in good condition 3-7 days (3.3 ± 1.9 days) after the procedure. Currently, 95.7 % are being followed up. During the 5-year follow-up period, 1 patient died due to concomitant heart failure, heart rhythm disturbances (atrial fibrillation) and mitral insufficiency. There were 10.1 % patients (n = 19) with complications: 4.9 % (n = 4) with open-cell stents, 12.1 % (n = 13) with closed-cell stents, 2.2 % (n = 4) with stent-grafts, 7.9 % (n = 16) with uncovered stents. The frequency of reinterventions was 45.0 % in patients older than 25 years, 37.2 % in those aged 5-18 years and 17.6 % in those aged 19-25 years. Conclusions. The choice of optimally necessary devices for endovascular stenting of the aorta is recommended to be carried out considering the anatomical features of the defect and the age of the patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内治疗主动脉缩窄最佳装置的选择
的目标。考虑到主动脉缩窄(CoA)的解剖特征和患者的年龄,确定血管内支架植入术的最佳设备。材料和方法。本文对189例5 ~ 60岁不同解剖形态变异的CoA患者进行了检查和血管内治疗。结果和讨论。我们介绍了不同解剖形态变异的CoA的临床特征。血管内支架治疗CoA被认为是青少年和成人的最佳方法,因为与球囊血管成形术相比,动脉瘤形成的风险较低。我们能够成功地降低不同年龄患者的侵入性压力梯度,并建立并发症频率与所使用的支架类型的依赖关系。没有院内死亡病例。干预有效率为99.4%。术后3 ~ 7天(3.3±1.9天)出院,病情良好。目前,95.7%的患者正在接受随访。5年随访期间,1例患者因合并心力衰竭、心律失常(心房颤动)和二尖瓣功能不全死亡。10.1%的患者(n = 19)出现并发症:开放细胞支架4.9% (n = 4),封闭细胞支架12.1% (n = 13),支架移植物2.2% (n = 4),无覆盖支架7.9% (n = 16)。25岁以上患者再干预率为45.0%,5-18岁为37.2%,19-25岁为17.6%。结论。考虑到缺损的解剖特征和患者的年龄,建议选择血管内支架植入术所需的最佳设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Use of Non-Invasive Lung Ventilation Support in Newborns and Young Children after Cardiac Surgery Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm Features of Catheter Treatment of Non-Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Issues of Organization of the Cardiac Surgical Care in Ukraine under Martial Law Hemostasiological Aspects of PCI: Periprocedural Changes in the Activity of the Platelet Link of Hemocoagulation on the Background of Prior Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1