Alienation between the Critique of Dialectical Reason and the Critique of Economic Reason: Sketch of a Materialist Ethics

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY Sartre Studies International Pub Date : 2016-03-01 DOI:10.3167/SSI.2016.220107
Chiara Collamati
{"title":"Alienation between the Critique of Dialectical Reason and the Critique of Economic Reason: Sketch of a Materialist Ethics","authors":"Chiara Collamati","doi":"10.3167/SSI.2016.220107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through an analysis of the category of alienation in the Critique of Dialectical Reason, this article aims to shed light on the way in which Sartre attempts to think through alienation both with Marx and going beyond Marx. Sartre does not reduce alienation either to an ontological dimension of praxis or to the exclusively socio-economic determination of the capitalist mode of production. In order to grasp better the theoretical stakes of Sartre’s position, André Gorz’s analyses of the link between labour and alienation is discussed. The path via Gorz (who always insisted on his philosophical indebtedness to Sartre) is useful in order to ascertain whether it is justified to adopt the Sartrean dialectic of praxis and alienation as the basis of a critique of labour in the present configuration of the capitalist system. These questions will be taken as a starting point for an ethical and political examination of the category of need, as it is problematized by Sartre in the Critique and above all in the manuscript of “Les Racines de l’éthique” (1964).","PeriodicalId":41680,"journal":{"name":"Sartre Studies International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/SSI.2016.220107","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sartre Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/SSI.2016.220107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Through an analysis of the category of alienation in the Critique of Dialectical Reason, this article aims to shed light on the way in which Sartre attempts to think through alienation both with Marx and going beyond Marx. Sartre does not reduce alienation either to an ontological dimension of praxis or to the exclusively socio-economic determination of the capitalist mode of production. In order to grasp better the theoretical stakes of Sartre’s position, André Gorz’s analyses of the link between labour and alienation is discussed. The path via Gorz (who always insisted on his philosophical indebtedness to Sartre) is useful in order to ascertain whether it is justified to adopt the Sartrean dialectic of praxis and alienation as the basis of a critique of labour in the present configuration of the capitalist system. These questions will be taken as a starting point for an ethical and political examination of the category of need, as it is problematized by Sartre in the Critique and above all in the manuscript of “Les Racines de l’éthique” (1964).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《辩证理性批判》与《经济理性批判》的异化:唯物主义伦理学概论
本文旨在通过对《辩证理性批判》中异化范畴的分析,揭示萨特试图与马克思并超越马克思来思考异化的方式。萨特既没有将异化还原为实践的本体论维度,也没有将异化还原为资本主义生产方式独有的社会经济决定。为了更好地把握萨特立场的理论赌注,本文讨论了安德烈·格尔茨对劳动与异化之间联系的分析。通过Gorz(他一直坚持他对萨特的哲学亏欠)的路径是有用的,以确定是否有理由采用萨特的实践和异化辩证法作为批判当前资本主义制度结构中的劳动的基础。这些问题将被视为对需要范畴进行伦理和政治检查的起点,因为它是萨特在《批判》中提出的问题,尤其是在《Les Racines de l’samthique》(1964)的手稿中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Tortured Freedom Philosophical Fiction as World Literature Towards a Phenomenology of Reflective Identification Jazz Improvisation and Creolizing Phenomenology Self-Consciousness and Self-Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1