Assessing psychological flexibility in adolescents: Validation of PsyFlex-A

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.284
Renata Soares, M. Cunha, I. Massano-Cardoso, A. Galhardo
{"title":"Assessing psychological flexibility in adolescents: Validation of PsyFlex-A","authors":"Renata Soares, M. Cunha, I. Massano-Cardoso, A. Galhardo","doi":"10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To adapt and validate the Psy-Flex for the adolescent population (PsyFlex-A). The aim was to analyse the PsyFlex-A factor structure, reliability, the model's invariance between genders, and associations between the PsyFlex-A, sociodemographic variables, and other variables of interest. Method: The sample included 309 adolescents between 12 to 18 years old (M = 14.91) and a mean of 9.56 years of education. The participants completed a protocol comprising the PsyFlex-A and a set of other self-report measures assessing mindfulness skills (CAMM), cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance (AFQ-Y8), psychopathological symptoms (DASS-21), and the perceived quality of life and well-being (KidScreen-10). A subsample of 45 participants completed the PsyFlex-A four weeks after the first administration to conduct a test-retest reliability analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to assess the scale's structure. A multi-group CFA was conducted to determine the measurement invariance across genders. Reliability and validity were also analysed. Results: The PsyFlex-A presented a single-factor structure and model invariance between genders, suggesting that the results are comparable between males and females. Moreover, it revealed adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It showed positive associations with mindfulness skills and quality of life and negative associations with cognitive fusion/experiential avoidance and psychopathological symptoms. Finally, significant gender differences were found, with boys revealing higher values of psychological flexibility than girls. Conclusion: The PsyFlex-A proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing Portuguese adolescents' psychological flexibility skills. The PsyFlex-A may be used as a screening instrument in educational and clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":52016,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To adapt and validate the Psy-Flex for the adolescent population (PsyFlex-A). The aim was to analyse the PsyFlex-A factor structure, reliability, the model's invariance between genders, and associations between the PsyFlex-A, sociodemographic variables, and other variables of interest. Method: The sample included 309 adolescents between 12 to 18 years old (M = 14.91) and a mean of 9.56 years of education. The participants completed a protocol comprising the PsyFlex-A and a set of other self-report measures assessing mindfulness skills (CAMM), cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance (AFQ-Y8), psychopathological symptoms (DASS-21), and the perceived quality of life and well-being (KidScreen-10). A subsample of 45 participants completed the PsyFlex-A four weeks after the first administration to conduct a test-retest reliability analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to assess the scale's structure. A multi-group CFA was conducted to determine the measurement invariance across genders. Reliability and validity were also analysed. Results: The PsyFlex-A presented a single-factor structure and model invariance between genders, suggesting that the results are comparable between males and females. Moreover, it revealed adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It showed positive associations with mindfulness skills and quality of life and negative associations with cognitive fusion/experiential avoidance and psychopathological symptoms. Finally, significant gender differences were found, with boys revealing higher values of psychological flexibility than girls. Conclusion: The PsyFlex-A proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing Portuguese adolescents' psychological flexibility skills. The PsyFlex-A may be used as a screening instrument in educational and clinical settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年心理弹性评估:PsyFlex-A的验证
目的:为青少年群体(PsyFlex-A)调整和验证psyflex。目的是分析PsyFlex-A的因素结构、可靠性、模型在性别之间的不变性,以及PsyFlex-A、社会人口变量和其他感兴趣的变量之间的关联。方法:样本为309名12 ~ 18岁的青少年(M = 14.91),平均受教育程度为9.56岁。参与者完成了一份方案,包括PsyFlex-A和一组其他自我报告测量,评估正念技能(CAMM)、认知融合和经验回避(AFQ-Y8)、精神病理症状(DASS-21)和感知生活质量和幸福感(KidScreen-10)。45名参与者的子样本在第一次给药四周后完成了PsyFlex-A测试,以进行测试-再测试可靠性分析。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估量表的结构。采用多组CFA来确定不同性别的测量不变性。分析了信度和效度。结果:PsyFlex-A呈现单因素结构和性别之间的模型不变性,表明结果在男性和女性之间具有可比性。此外,它显示出足够的内部一致性和重测信度。它与正念技能和生活质量呈正相关,与认知融合/经验回避和精神病理症状呈负相关。最后,发现了显著的性别差异,男孩比女孩表现出更高的心理灵活性值。结论:PsyFlex-A量表是评估葡萄牙青少年心理弹性技能的有效、可靠的工具。PsyFlex-A可作为教育和临床环境中的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepção de sorofobia entre homens gays que vivem com HIV Maternidades em terras estrangeiras: Uma scoping review das experiências de mulheres migrantes e refugiadas Cyberloafing in the classroom: A qualitative study with Nigerian undergraduate students Gravidez e depressão pós-parto (DPP): uma revisão não sistemática sobre o estado da arte do conhecimento da DPP Preconceito dos estudantes universitários em relação à deficiência: Um estudo exploratório
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1