{"title":"Public Experience/Private Authority","authors":"M. Buskirk","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/b9kza","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“A beam on its end is not the same thing as the same beam on its side,” wrote Robert Morris in his 1966 Notes on Sculpture, Part II, succinctly articulating the degree to which, in the context of minimalism, the identity of a work does not reside in a self-contained physical form, and is instead deflected outward to the relationship established between object and surrounding space.1 It also happens that Morris was not necessarily concerned about whether the simple geometric shapes he created during the mid-1960s as part of his exploration of the viewer’s spatial and temporal experience maintained a continuous physical existence. To the extent that the work could be disassembled and built again as needed (the same configuration, but different plywood and gray paint), this alternate way in which the same work might not be the same links his profoundly physical expression with a form of dematerialization more often associated with conceptual art. There is an obvious debt to minimalism in the ways that Félix González-Torres’s work occupies the environment traversed by the viewer— with the stacks of paper and candy sitting directly on the floor, or the interplay between work and setting for the light strings and bead curtains. Yet it is equally clear that many of González-Torres’s pieces can vary quite dramatically and still be understood as the same work of art. In addition to the decisions made by curators and collectors for each initial installation, there are ongoing changes to the candy arrangements and paper stacks as a result of viewer interaction. Public participation is an essential element, particularly in relation to the invitation to pick up a wrapped sweet or a sheet of paper. Even so, the work is also intensely private with respect to the bond established between artist and owner via","PeriodicalId":39833,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/b9kza","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
“A beam on its end is not the same thing as the same beam on its side,” wrote Robert Morris in his 1966 Notes on Sculpture, Part II, succinctly articulating the degree to which, in the context of minimalism, the identity of a work does not reside in a self-contained physical form, and is instead deflected outward to the relationship established between object and surrounding space.1 It also happens that Morris was not necessarily concerned about whether the simple geometric shapes he created during the mid-1960s as part of his exploration of the viewer’s spatial and temporal experience maintained a continuous physical existence. To the extent that the work could be disassembled and built again as needed (the same configuration, but different plywood and gray paint), this alternate way in which the same work might not be the same links his profoundly physical expression with a form of dematerialization more often associated with conceptual art. There is an obvious debt to minimalism in the ways that Félix González-Torres’s work occupies the environment traversed by the viewer— with the stacks of paper and candy sitting directly on the floor, or the interplay between work and setting for the light strings and bead curtains. Yet it is equally clear that many of González-Torres’s pieces can vary quite dramatically and still be understood as the same work of art. In addition to the decisions made by curators and collectors for each initial installation, there are ongoing changes to the candy arrangements and paper stacks as a result of viewer interaction. Public participation is an essential element, particularly in relation to the invitation to pick up a wrapped sweet or a sheet of paper. Even so, the work is also intensely private with respect to the bond established between artist and owner via
Robert Morris在他1966年的《雕塑笔记》(Notes on Sculpture, Part II)中简洁地阐述了在极简主义的背景下,作品的身份并不存在于一个独立的物理形式中,而是向外偏转到物体与周围空间之间建立的关系中碰巧的是,莫里斯并不一定关心他在20世纪60年代中期创作的简单几何形状,作为他对观众空间和时间体验的探索的一部分,是否保持了连续的物理存在。在某种程度上,作品可以根据需要拆卸和重新构建(相同的配置,但不同的胶合板和灰色油漆),这种相同作品可能不相同的替代方式将他深刻的物理表达与一种非物质化形式联系在一起,这种非物质化形式通常与概念艺术有关。很明显,这是对极简主义的一种借鉴,因为flix González-Torres的作品占据了观者所穿越的环境——一叠叠的纸和糖果直接放在地板上,或者是作品与背景之间的相互作用,比如灯光串和头饰窗帘。然而,同样清楚的是,González-Torres的许多作品可以变化很大,但仍然可以被理解为同一件艺术作品。除了策展人和收藏家对每个初始装置的决定外,由于观众的互动,糖果的摆放和纸张的堆叠也在不断变化。公众参与是一个必不可少的因素,特别是在邀请人们拿起一个包装好的糖果或一张纸的时候。即便如此,这件作品也是非常私密的,因为它体现了艺术家和主人之间的联系
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1991, the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (JLPP) has quickly risen to become one of the leading public policy journals in the nation. A fixture among the top 10 policy journals, JLPP has consistently been among the top 100 student-edited law journals. JLPP publishes articles, student notes, essays, book reviews, and other scholarly works that examine the intersections of compelling public or social policy issues and the law. As a journal of law and policy, we are a publication that not only analyzes the law but also seeks to impact its development.