EFECTOS DE LARGO PLAZO DE INSTRUMENTOS DE REGULACIÓN PESQUERA: CASO DE LA PESQUERÍA DEL JUREL TRACHURUS MURPHYI (NICHOLS, 1920) EN LA ZONA CENTRO SUR DE CHILE

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.25268/BIMC.INVEMAR.2007.36.0.200
Rocío Tíjaro Rojas, Hugo Salgado Cabrera
{"title":"EFECTOS DE LARGO PLAZO DE INSTRUMENTOS DE REGULACIÓN PESQUERA: CASO DE LA PESQUERÍA DEL JUREL TRACHURUS MURPHYI (NICHOLS, 1920) EN LA ZONA CENTRO SUR DE CHILE","authors":"Rocío Tíjaro Rojas, Hugo Salgado Cabrera","doi":"10.25268/BIMC.INVEMAR.2007.36.0.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chilean Pacific jack mackerel (Nichols, 1920) fishery yields about 90% of the Eastern South Pacific catch. The Southern Central region is the one that concentrates the major abundance of this resource. The objective of this study is to test which of the regulation fishery systems is the most efficient for this fishery from a bioeconomic approach. Based on catch and effort data, the behaviour of the T. murphy stock and the fishing fleet was simulated over time under three regulatory scenarios: open access, total allowable catch and individual transferable quotas. The behaviour of the fish stock, and the dynamics of fishing vessels coming in and going out over time from the fishery, were represented by equations of the model. The results indicate that when the fishery operates in open access, the biomass and economics benefit diminished, whereas the number of fishing vessels increased (mostly small and middle-sized ones). Upon imposing the total allowable catch, biomass increased and maintained over time, while the size fleet decreased (middle-sized and large vessels). Within the individual transferable quotas view, the fish stock behaves in a similar way to the total allowable catch measure. However, significant differences in terms of fleet size (reduction of only 10% of the initial size), as well as structure (remaining only large vessels in operation) and economic profits obtained (maximum in this regulation), arise from this framework modelling. In conclusion, from the fishery bioecomic point of view the individual transferable quotas was the best management scenario for the Southern Pacific Jack Mackerel.","PeriodicalId":35743,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras","volume":"36 1","pages":"49-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25268/BIMC.INVEMAR.2007.36.0.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chilean Pacific jack mackerel (Nichols, 1920) fishery yields about 90% of the Eastern South Pacific catch. The Southern Central region is the one that concentrates the major abundance of this resource. The objective of this study is to test which of the regulation fishery systems is the most efficient for this fishery from a bioeconomic approach. Based on catch and effort data, the behaviour of the T. murphy stock and the fishing fleet was simulated over time under three regulatory scenarios: open access, total allowable catch and individual transferable quotas. The behaviour of the fish stock, and the dynamics of fishing vessels coming in and going out over time from the fishery, were represented by equations of the model. The results indicate that when the fishery operates in open access, the biomass and economics benefit diminished, whereas the number of fishing vessels increased (mostly small and middle-sized ones). Upon imposing the total allowable catch, biomass increased and maintained over time, while the size fleet decreased (middle-sized and large vessels). Within the individual transferable quotas view, the fish stock behaves in a similar way to the total allowable catch measure. However, significant differences in terms of fleet size (reduction of only 10% of the initial size), as well as structure (remaining only large vessels in operation) and economic profits obtained (maximum in this regulation), arise from this framework modelling. In conclusion, from the fishery bioecomic point of view the individual transferable quotas was the best management scenario for the Southern Pacific Jack Mackerel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渔业管制工具的长期影响:以智利中南部捕捞鲭鱼(NICHOLS, 1920)为例
智利太平洋长尾鲭鱼(Nichols, 1920)渔业产量约占南太平洋东部渔获量的90%。中南部地区是这一资源最丰富的地区。本研究的目的是从生物经济角度检验哪一种管制渔业系统对这种渔业最有效。根据渔获量和努力量数据,模拟了三种管制情景下T. murphy种群和渔船队随时间的行为:开放获取、允许总渔获量和个人可转让配额。鱼类种群的行为和渔船在一段时间内进出渔场的动态,由模型方程表示。结果表明:当渔业在开放通道进行时,生物量和经济效益降低,而渔船数量增加(以中小型渔船为主);在施加总允许捕获量后,生物量随着时间的推移而增加并保持不变,而船队规模(中型和大型船只)则减少。在个别可转让配额的观点中,鱼类种群的行为与总允许捕获量措施类似。然而,该框架模型在船队规模(仅减少初始规模的10%)、结构(仅保留运营中的大型船舶)和获得的经济利润(本规则中最大)方面产生了显著差异。最后,从渔业生物经济学的观点来看,单个可转让配额是南太平洋杰克鲭鱼的最佳管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras
Boletin de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Estructura comunitaria del microfitobentos de la zona costera central de Venezuela Mapping of mudflats with UAV images in La Bocana de Iscuandé, Colombian Pacific coast Seasonal dynamics in the inner Guayas Estuary, Ecuador Mortalidad del coral Acropora palmata por una enfermedad similar al white pox en la bahía de Cinto, Parque Nacional Natural Tayrona, Caribe colombiano Gen Citocromo Oxidasa I confirma la presencia del nemertino Carcinonemertes conanobrieni, parásito de la langosta espinosa del Caribe (Panulirus argus) en Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1