Transatlantische Transformationsprozesse im „Black Atlantic“. Hubert Fichte und postkoloniale literarische Konzepte aus Brasilien und Kuba im Diskurs. Von Isabelle Leitloff. Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2021. 445 Seiten. €40.00 gebunden oder eBook.

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Monatshefte Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3368/m.115.1.135
A. Fischer
{"title":"Transatlantische Transformationsprozesse im „Black Atlantic“. Hubert Fichte und postkoloniale literarische Konzepte aus Brasilien und Kuba im Diskurs. Von Isabelle Leitloff. Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2021. 445 Seiten. €40.00 gebunden oder eBook.","authors":"A. Fischer","doi":"10.3368/m.115.1.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Odermatt’s adaptation frequently misses the point. Precisely through their failure, they highlight these main contours of Tabori’s work. One of the most interesting and theoretically challenging chapters in Open Wounds is by Klaus van den Berg, who interprets Tabori through the lens of Walter Benjamin’s notion of Bildraum. Bildraum literally means image space, but in Benjamin’s theorization, it refers to a mode of cognition born of modernity’s shocks. Van den Berg argues that Benjamin’s concept overlaps with Tabori’s image of himself as a Spielmacher (play maker), a soccer term that suggests he did not so much direct actors as create Spielraum for them—room in which to play. This Spielraum/Bildraum becomes the setting for what van den Berg terms “performance illuminations,” flashes of understanding and revolutionary experience that conjoin “physical, psychological, and historical space” (69). This setting aims to establish “a visual passage between past and present and makes ideas legible on stage” (70). Van den Berg then applies this critical model to Tabori’s two productions of The Merchant of Venice, which he reads as responses to the Holocaust. We learn that, before Munich authorities vetoed the idea, Tabori even wanted his 1978 production of the play to be performed in Dachau in a staging whereby audience members and actors would be bussed together to the camp. These productions demonstrate how Tabori “advanced from modern director in the mimetic theater to a unique playmaker orchestrating the unfolding of memory and experience” (71). Open Wounds has a few of the vices typical of edited scholarly collections, such as repetition of themes and minor inconsistencies. For instance, Tabori’s Kafkainspired 1977 play Hungerkünstler, for which his cast prepared through a medically supervised fast for forty days, is translated in three different ways, as The Fasting Artists, The Hunger Artists, and The Hunger Artist. But these are not worth dwelling on because the book certainly has far more virtues. Foremost among them is its concision and clarity. In just 200 pages, the pieces of this scholarly mosaic construct a vivid picture of George Tabori’s many identities and the theoretical underpinnings of his theater. The introduction and ten essays, all scrupulously footnoted, typically number between 15 and 20 pages. This economy of prose makes them pedagogically useful for Holocaust studies, German studies, and theater courses, where George Tabori might yet receive the credit he is due.","PeriodicalId":54028,"journal":{"name":"Monatshefte","volume":"25 1","pages":"135 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatshefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.1.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Odermatt’s adaptation frequently misses the point. Precisely through their failure, they highlight these main contours of Tabori’s work. One of the most interesting and theoretically challenging chapters in Open Wounds is by Klaus van den Berg, who interprets Tabori through the lens of Walter Benjamin’s notion of Bildraum. Bildraum literally means image space, but in Benjamin’s theorization, it refers to a mode of cognition born of modernity’s shocks. Van den Berg argues that Benjamin’s concept overlaps with Tabori’s image of himself as a Spielmacher (play maker), a soccer term that suggests he did not so much direct actors as create Spielraum for them—room in which to play. This Spielraum/Bildraum becomes the setting for what van den Berg terms “performance illuminations,” flashes of understanding and revolutionary experience that conjoin “physical, psychological, and historical space” (69). This setting aims to establish “a visual passage between past and present and makes ideas legible on stage” (70). Van den Berg then applies this critical model to Tabori’s two productions of The Merchant of Venice, which he reads as responses to the Holocaust. We learn that, before Munich authorities vetoed the idea, Tabori even wanted his 1978 production of the play to be performed in Dachau in a staging whereby audience members and actors would be bussed together to the camp. These productions demonstrate how Tabori “advanced from modern director in the mimetic theater to a unique playmaker orchestrating the unfolding of memory and experience” (71). Open Wounds has a few of the vices typical of edited scholarly collections, such as repetition of themes and minor inconsistencies. For instance, Tabori’s Kafkainspired 1977 play Hungerkünstler, for which his cast prepared through a medically supervised fast for forty days, is translated in three different ways, as The Fasting Artists, The Hunger Artists, and The Hunger Artist. But these are not worth dwelling on because the book certainly has far more virtues. Foremost among them is its concision and clarity. In just 200 pages, the pieces of this scholarly mosaic construct a vivid picture of George Tabori’s many identities and the theoretical underpinnings of his theater. The introduction and ten essays, all scrupulously footnoted, typically number between 15 and 20 pages. This economy of prose makes them pedagogically useful for Holocaust studies, German studies, and theater courses, where George Tabori might yet receive the credit he is due.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大西洋大西洋的转变过程菲利普·费希特和后殖民时期古巴的文学概念正在讨论中。是伊莎贝尔。"乳糖",2021年. 445页€40.00约束或eBook .
奥德马特的改编常常没有抓住要点。正是通过他们的失败,他们突出了塔波里作品的这些主要轮廓。《敞开的伤口》中最有趣、最具理论挑战性的章节之一是克劳斯·范登伯格写的,他通过瓦尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)的比德劳姆(Bildraum)概念来解读塔波里。Bildraum的字面意思是图像空间,但在本雅明的理论化中,它指的是一种因现代性冲击而产生的认知模式。Van den Berg认为Benjamin的概念与Tabori将自己视为Spielmacher(游戏创造者)的形象重叠,这是一个足球术语,表明他并没有直接指导演员,而是为他们创造了Spielraum(游戏邦注:即为他们创造游戏空间)。这个Spielraum/Bildraum成为van den Berg所说的“表演照明”的背景,是结合“物理、心理和历史空间”的理解和革命经验的闪光(69)。这种设置旨在建立“过去和现在之间的视觉通道,使思想在舞台上清晰可辨”(70)。范登伯格随后将这一批判模式应用于塔波里的两部《威尼斯商人》,他认为这两部作品是对大屠杀的回应。我们了解到,在慕尼黑当局否决这个想法之前,塔博里甚至希望他1978年制作的这部戏剧在达豪的舞台上演出,观众和演员将一起被大巴送到集中营。这些作品展示了塔波里如何“从模仿剧场的现代导演发展成为一个独特的组织者,精心策划记忆和经验的展开”(71)。《开放的创伤》有一些典型的学术文集的缺点,比如重复主题和小的不一致。例如,塔里1977年创作的受卡夫卡启发的戏剧《饥饿的斯特勒》(hungerknstler)被翻译成三种不同的方式,分别是《禁食的艺术家》、《饥饿的艺术家》和《饥饿的艺术家》。他的演员们在医学监督下禁食了40天。但这些都不值得赘述,因为这本书肯定有更多的优点。其中最重要的是它的简洁和清晰。在短短200页的篇幅里,这幅学术拼贴画生动地描绘了乔治·塔博里的许多身份,以及他的戏剧的理论基础。引言和十篇文章,都有严谨的脚注,通常有15到20页。这种简洁的散文使它们在大屠杀研究、德国研究和戏剧课程中具有教学意义,在这些课程中,乔治·塔博里可能还会得到他应得的荣誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Monatshefte
Monatshefte LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
The Journalist as Producer: Mapping the Scene Der Journalist als Menschentypus. Walter Benjamin und der Professionalisierungsdiskurs um 1930 Walter Benjamin and the Networks of the Frankfurter Zeitung Writing at the End: Benjamin, Kraus, and the Image of Journalism Benjamins zeitdiagnostische Rezensionstätigkeit zwischen Text und Kontexten. Exemplarische Analysen eines Spannungsverhältnisses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1