Film und Kino als Spiegel. Siegfried Kracauers Filmschriften aus Deutschland und Frankreich. Von Viola Rühse. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. 320 Seiten + 70 s/w + 17 farbige Abbildungen. €69,95/$80.99 gebunden oder eBook.
{"title":"Film und Kino als Spiegel. Siegfried Kracauers Filmschriften aus Deutschland und Frankreich. Von Viola Rühse. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. 320 Seiten + 70 s/w + 17 farbige Abbildungen. €69,95/$80.99 gebunden oder eBook.","authors":"M. Wedel","doi":"10.3368/m.115.2.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"raising of issues around working-class disability and the perceptual delusions brought on by alcoholic intoxication. The last chapter addresses the political ambivalence that is inherent to the discourse of hygiene by considering how it is deployed on the Left. Biopower and eugenics have typically been associated with the political Right; however, Dobryden works through the contradictions that arise when a politics that critiques the ideology of capitalist productivity simultaneously, perhaps unwittingly, reifies notions of collective health and hygiene. Films like Zeitprobleme: Wie der Arbeiter wohnt (1930) and the canonical Kuhle Wampe (1930), while depicting the ravages of capitalist modernity on the body and mind, reinscribe the hygienic call for the well-being of a collective in the name of revolutionary material environments. This chapter traces the genealogy of this political ambivalence to writings by urban planners and social hygienists, but also the filmmakers themselves, drawing out the need for historians to nuance our understanding of left-wing politics in the late Weimar period. Like other erudite studies of media archaeology that operate against the backdrop of a sophisticated theoretical apparatus, Dobryden’s monograph is a pleasurable, enlightening, and in many ways inspiring read. In its display of rigorous archival research, interesting choice of film texts, and exploration of new interpretative possibilities, the reader will see there is still much to be learned from Weimar cinema. This is true of the ostensibly familiar theme of hygiene and its politicization within the context of German modernity. The Hygienic Apparatus thus is highly recommended for scholars and graduate students, but its readability also allows undergraduate students at all levels to engage productively with its important ideas.","PeriodicalId":54028,"journal":{"name":"Monatshefte","volume":"115 1","pages":"307 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatshefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.2.307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
raising of issues around working-class disability and the perceptual delusions brought on by alcoholic intoxication. The last chapter addresses the political ambivalence that is inherent to the discourse of hygiene by considering how it is deployed on the Left. Biopower and eugenics have typically been associated with the political Right; however, Dobryden works through the contradictions that arise when a politics that critiques the ideology of capitalist productivity simultaneously, perhaps unwittingly, reifies notions of collective health and hygiene. Films like Zeitprobleme: Wie der Arbeiter wohnt (1930) and the canonical Kuhle Wampe (1930), while depicting the ravages of capitalist modernity on the body and mind, reinscribe the hygienic call for the well-being of a collective in the name of revolutionary material environments. This chapter traces the genealogy of this political ambivalence to writings by urban planners and social hygienists, but also the filmmakers themselves, drawing out the need for historians to nuance our understanding of left-wing politics in the late Weimar period. Like other erudite studies of media archaeology that operate against the backdrop of a sophisticated theoretical apparatus, Dobryden’s monograph is a pleasurable, enlightening, and in many ways inspiring read. In its display of rigorous archival research, interesting choice of film texts, and exploration of new interpretative possibilities, the reader will see there is still much to be learned from Weimar cinema. This is true of the ostensibly familiar theme of hygiene and its politicization within the context of German modernity. The Hygienic Apparatus thus is highly recommended for scholars and graduate students, but its readability also allows undergraduate students at all levels to engage productively with its important ideas.
提出了关于工人阶级残疾和酒精中毒带来的感性错觉的问题。最后一章讨论了卫生话语固有的政治矛盾心理,考虑了它是如何在左翼部署的。生物能源和优生学通常与政治权利联系在一起;然而,Dobryden的作品贯穿了一种矛盾,当一种政治批判资本主义生产力的意识形态的同时,也许是无意中,具体化了集体健康和卫生的概念。1930年的电影《时代问题:艺术的问题》(zeitproblem: Wie der Arbeiter wohnt)和1930年的经典电影《Kuhle Wampe》(Kuhle Wampe)在描绘资本主义现代性对身体和精神的摧残的同时,以革命物质环境的名义重新呼唤集体幸福的卫生。这一章追溯了这种政治矛盾的谱系,从城市规划者和社会卫生学家的作品,到电影制作人自己的作品,得出了历史学家对我们对魏玛后期左翼政治的理解的细微差别的需要。就像其他在复杂理论装置的背景下进行的媒体考古学的博学研究一样,多布莱登的专著是令人愉快的,有启发性的,在许多方面都是鼓舞人心的。在严谨的档案研究、有趣的电影文本选择和对新的解释可能性的探索中,读者会发现魏玛电影还有很多值得学习的地方。表面上熟悉的卫生主题及其在德国现代性背景下的政治化也是如此。因此,《卫生器具》被强烈推荐给学者和研究生,但它的可读性也允许各级本科生有效地参与其中的重要思想。