Kafka’s Zoopoetics: Beyond the Human-Animal Barrier. By Naama Harel. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2020. 216 pages + 1 image. $59.95 hardcover, open access eBook.
{"title":"Kafka’s Zoopoetics: Beyond the Human-Animal Barrier. By Naama Harel. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2020. 216 pages + 1 image. $59.95 hardcover, open access eBook.","authors":"H. Braunbeck","doi":"10.3368/m.115.2.300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"is to demonstrate the constructed nature of scientific narratives, including Koch’s Ätiologie der Tuberkulose [1884]. With her focus on origin stories and the beginnings of the detective story in the nineteenth century, Seidel’s prose is stylistically in keeping with the sweeping narratives of the period under consideration. Her writing is engaging, and the author excels at providing detailed analyses of countless intersections between literature and science that are consistently well researched and argued. Nevertheless, the work would have benefited from more embedded synthesis and signposting, where the larger implications of Seidel’s findings for the detective-story genre or individual scientific disciplines emerged more prominently. On more than one occasion, this reviewer stumbled over what seemed to be abrupt shifts in focus, when the author—without providing an explicit synthesis of preceding material or a rationale for subsequent content—moved to an excursus, a new text, or a new section. To be sure, each subsection of the case studies indicates a theme (with respect to evolutionary biology, “Missing Links”), yet the ultimate organizing principle in this section is a close reading of individual works to highlight the existence of common discourses across science and literature. In her conclusion, Seidel touches on the rationale for the selection of works included in her study (439); a brief treatment of these criteria would have been a welcome addition to the disciplinary subsections, as would a consideration of the patterns or development that the works present within a given subsection. Alternately, a more explicitly thematic organization in the third section might have facilitated subsequent reference to Seidel’s analyses. These points do not significantly impinge on the manifold contributions to intellectual and cultural history of the long nineteenth century of Seidel’s study. Her close readings of detective stories, among them Perutz’s and Huch’s texts, are in and of themselves meaningful contributions to the discipline. Yet more significantly, the author successfully weaves crime and detective fiction into the intellectual fabric of the nineteenth century, offers an innovative and productive definition of the subgenre of the detective story, and illuminates the constructed nature of scientific writings. As such, Dem Anfang auf der Spur promises to be of interest to scholars in interdisciplinary fields, including comparative literature, narrative theory, and literature and science studies.","PeriodicalId":54028,"journal":{"name":"Monatshefte","volume":"115 1","pages":"300 - 303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatshefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/m.115.2.300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
is to demonstrate the constructed nature of scientific narratives, including Koch’s Ätiologie der Tuberkulose [1884]. With her focus on origin stories and the beginnings of the detective story in the nineteenth century, Seidel’s prose is stylistically in keeping with the sweeping narratives of the period under consideration. Her writing is engaging, and the author excels at providing detailed analyses of countless intersections between literature and science that are consistently well researched and argued. Nevertheless, the work would have benefited from more embedded synthesis and signposting, where the larger implications of Seidel’s findings for the detective-story genre or individual scientific disciplines emerged more prominently. On more than one occasion, this reviewer stumbled over what seemed to be abrupt shifts in focus, when the author—without providing an explicit synthesis of preceding material or a rationale for subsequent content—moved to an excursus, a new text, or a new section. To be sure, each subsection of the case studies indicates a theme (with respect to evolutionary biology, “Missing Links”), yet the ultimate organizing principle in this section is a close reading of individual works to highlight the existence of common discourses across science and literature. In her conclusion, Seidel touches on the rationale for the selection of works included in her study (439); a brief treatment of these criteria would have been a welcome addition to the disciplinary subsections, as would a consideration of the patterns or development that the works present within a given subsection. Alternately, a more explicitly thematic organization in the third section might have facilitated subsequent reference to Seidel’s analyses. These points do not significantly impinge on the manifold contributions to intellectual and cultural history of the long nineteenth century of Seidel’s study. Her close readings of detective stories, among them Perutz’s and Huch’s texts, are in and of themselves meaningful contributions to the discipline. Yet more significantly, the author successfully weaves crime and detective fiction into the intellectual fabric of the nineteenth century, offers an innovative and productive definition of the subgenre of the detective story, and illuminates the constructed nature of scientific writings. As such, Dem Anfang auf der Spur promises to be of interest to scholars in interdisciplinary fields, including comparative literature, narrative theory, and literature and science studies.
是为了展示科学叙事的建构本质,包括科赫的Ätiologie der Tuberkulose[1884]。塞德尔专注于19世纪的起源故事和侦探小说的开端,她的散文在风格上与所考虑的时期的广泛叙事保持一致。她的作品引人入胜,作者擅长于对文学与科学之间无数的交叉点进行详细分析,这些交叉点一直得到了很好的研究和论证。然而,这项工作将受益于更多的嵌入式综合和路标,在那里,塞德尔的发现对侦探小说类型或个别科学学科的更大影响更加突出。在不止一次的情况下,当作者没有对前面的材料提供明确的综合或对后续内容的基本理论,而是转移到一个附录、一个新的文本或一个新的章节时,笔者被似乎是突然的焦点转移绊倒了。可以肯定的是,案例研究的每一部分都表明了一个主题(关于进化生物学,“缺失的环节”),但本部分的最终组织原则是仔细阅读个别作品,以突出科学和文学中共同话语的存在。在她的结论中,Seidel谈到了她的研究中选择作品的基本原理(439);对这些标准的简短处理将是对学科分段的一个受欢迎的补充,正如在给定分段中考虑作品呈现的模式或发展一样。或者,在第三节中更明确的主题组织可能有助于随后参考Seidel的分析。这些观点并没有显著影响到赛德尔在漫长的19世纪对知识和文化史的多方面贡献。她仔细阅读侦探小说,其中包括佩鲁茨和胡奇的作品,这些作品本身就是对这门学科有意义的贡献。更重要的是,作者成功地将犯罪小说和侦探小说融入到19世纪的知识结构中,为侦探小说的亚类型提供了一个创新而富有成效的定义,并阐明了科学作品的建构本质。因此,《安芳》一书有望吸引跨学科领域的学者,包括比较文学、叙事理论、文学和科学研究。