MODERN TERMS IN CIVIL LAW: METHODOLOGICAL-CATEGORIAL ASPECT

A. Demieva
{"title":"MODERN TERMS IN CIVIL LAW: METHODOLOGICAL-CATEGORIAL ASPECT","authors":"A. Demieva","doi":"10.33397/2619-0559-2021-3-3-319-331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the article is devoted to the study of modern terms in domestic Russian civil law. Purpose: to show the reasons for the appearance of new terms in civil law and to identify the problems associated with their content, which are faced by scientists and practicing lawyers. Methods: theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; comparative legal method, empirical methods of comparison, description. Results: an analysis of some modern terms of civil law indicates the following reasons for their appearance. Firstly, internal growth and development of domestic civil legislation. Secondly, the emergence of new technologies. Thirdly, an erroneous and false understanding of the meaning of some concepts. Conclusions: the identified reasons of the appearance of new and borrowed terms in civil law require a differentiated scientific approach to their study in order to avoid erroneous and false understanding of their meaning. In order to become an element of the scientific terminological apparatus, current legislation and legal practice, any terminological borrowing must be systemic. Borrowing of new terms and concepts is necessary: firstly, in the absence of a similar lexical unit in domestic law, secondly, when there is a need for a unified approach to determining the content of a legal phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":33643,"journal":{"name":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2021-3-3-319-331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the article is devoted to the study of modern terms in domestic Russian civil law. Purpose: to show the reasons for the appearance of new terms in civil law and to identify the problems associated with their content, which are faced by scientists and practicing lawyers. Methods: theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; comparative legal method, empirical methods of comparison, description. Results: an analysis of some modern terms of civil law indicates the following reasons for their appearance. Firstly, internal growth and development of domestic civil legislation. Secondly, the emergence of new technologies. Thirdly, an erroneous and false understanding of the meaning of some concepts. Conclusions: the identified reasons of the appearance of new and borrowed terms in civil law require a differentiated scientific approach to their study in order to avoid erroneous and false understanding of their meaning. In order to become an element of the scientific terminological apparatus, current legislation and legal practice, any terminological borrowing must be systemic. Borrowing of new terms and concepts is necessary: firstly, in the absence of a similar lexical unit in domestic law, secondly, when there is a need for a unified approach to determining the content of a legal phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民法中的现代术语:方法论-范畴方面
前言:本文主要研究俄罗斯国内民法中的现代术语。目的:展示民法中新术语出现的原因,并确定与其内容相关的问题,这些问题是科学家和执业律师所面临的。方法:形式逻辑和辩证逻辑的理论方法;比较法、实证法的比较、描述。结果:通过对现代民法术语的分析,揭示了现代民法术语产生的原因。第一,国内民事立法的内部成长与发展。第二,新技术的出现。第三,对某些概念的含义有错误和错误的理解。结论:民法中新术语和借用术语出现的原因已被确定,因此需要用区分的科学方法对其进行研究,以避免对其含义的错误和错误理解。任何术语借用都必须是系统性的,才能成为科学术语机构、现行立法和法律实践的组成部分。借用新的术语和概念是必要的:首先,在国内法中缺乏类似的词汇单位,其次,当需要统一的方法来确定法律现象的内容时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LEGAL MODELING AS A METHOD OF CIVIL RESEARCH ON THE METHODOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE THEORY OF SYSTEMIC ORGANIZATION OF INTERSECTORAL RELATIONS OF CIVIL LAW: TO THE ANNIVERSARY OF M.IU. CHELYSHEV PHILOSOPHICAL BATTLE AGAINST MORAL HAZARD: DO WE NEED LAW METHODOLOGY CHANGE FROM “ALL OR NOTHING PRINCIPLE” TO “PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY”? THE CONCEPT OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THE EU LEGISLATION: ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF METHODOLOGY OF THE CIVIL LAW RESEARCH ADDITIONAL CONCLUSION ON A DISSERTATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1