CHILD’S INTEREST, LEGITIMATE INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND THE CHILD’S LEGALLY PROTECTED INTEREST: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO RESEARCH

S. Idrysheva, E. Komissarova
{"title":"CHILD’S INTEREST, LEGITIMATE INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND THE CHILD’S LEGALLY PROTECTED INTEREST: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO RESEARCH","authors":"S. Idrysheva, E. Komissarova","doi":"10.33397/2619-0559-2021-3-3-332-363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: populist rhetoric accompanying the concept of “child’s interest” gained its doctrinal tradition almost immediately with the adoption of the current Family Code of the Russian Federation. Regardless of the purpose of interpretation of this concept, its essence is usually reduced to the subjective aspirations of the child, which must be considered by all his social environment. As the textual analysis of the norms of the RF Family Code and the practice of law enforcement shows, the accumulation of experience of inconsistent and synonymous use of the concepts of “child’s interest” without a doctrinal analysis of the concepts related to it – legitimate interest, legally protected interest, and sometimes replaced by it, continues. Not without this, the question of how legal and non-legal relate in this concept remains open and not a little attracts the attention of the doctrine, although science still sends signals about the need for more “fine-tuning”. The purpose of the study is to theoretically recognize these signals using theoretical and methodological tools in order to conduct a theoretical categorization of the legal concepts “interests of the child”, “legitimate interests of the child”, “protected rights and interests of the child” that are actively used in the doctrine of family law and are very inconsistent in legislation. Methods: general scientific (dialectical); private scientific methods of cognition: formallegal, logical. Results: the structure of scientific knowledge about the interests of the child is not obvious today. In many ways, this state is generated by the facts of arbitrary use of interesting terminology. Family law science in this part does not so much create new scientific knowledge, but rather reflects the actual state of Affairs. While the real connection of the concept of child interest with legal matter implies not so much the frequency of its use in family legislation, but rather the connection with objective criteria. Based on the results of the study, the authors came to the following conclusions. One of the possible ways of further legally oriented research of the child’s interests may be to change the existing theoretical positions by attracting arguments based on the principles of regulatory and protective law. It appears to the authors, this approach will be able to distinguish between the interests of the child are significant for the implementation of its legal (legitimate interests) and interests, which in the case of a breach, to restore, to return the child the welfare state, which guaranteed to him by international and domestic law for the purposes of the full development of his personality (interests protected by law).","PeriodicalId":33643,"journal":{"name":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2021-3-3-332-363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: populist rhetoric accompanying the concept of “child’s interest” gained its doctrinal tradition almost immediately with the adoption of the current Family Code of the Russian Federation. Regardless of the purpose of interpretation of this concept, its essence is usually reduced to the subjective aspirations of the child, which must be considered by all his social environment. As the textual analysis of the norms of the RF Family Code and the practice of law enforcement shows, the accumulation of experience of inconsistent and synonymous use of the concepts of “child’s interest” without a doctrinal analysis of the concepts related to it – legitimate interest, legally protected interest, and sometimes replaced by it, continues. Not without this, the question of how legal and non-legal relate in this concept remains open and not a little attracts the attention of the doctrine, although science still sends signals about the need for more “fine-tuning”. The purpose of the study is to theoretically recognize these signals using theoretical and methodological tools in order to conduct a theoretical categorization of the legal concepts “interests of the child”, “legitimate interests of the child”, “protected rights and interests of the child” that are actively used in the doctrine of family law and are very inconsistent in legislation. Methods: general scientific (dialectical); private scientific methods of cognition: formallegal, logical. Results: the structure of scientific knowledge about the interests of the child is not obvious today. In many ways, this state is generated by the facts of arbitrary use of interesting terminology. Family law science in this part does not so much create new scientific knowledge, but rather reflects the actual state of Affairs. While the real connection of the concept of child interest with legal matter implies not so much the frequency of its use in family legislation, but rather the connection with objective criteria. Based on the results of the study, the authors came to the following conclusions. One of the possible ways of further legally oriented research of the child’s interests may be to change the existing theoretical positions by attracting arguments based on the principles of regulatory and protective law. It appears to the authors, this approach will be able to distinguish between the interests of the child are significant for the implementation of its legal (legitimate interests) and interests, which in the case of a breach, to restore, to return the child the welfare state, which guaranteed to him by international and domestic law for the purposes of the full development of his personality (interests protected by law).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童利益、儿童的合法利益和儿童受法律保护的利益:研究的理论和方法途径
导言:伴随着“儿童利益”概念的民粹主义修辞几乎在俄罗斯联邦现行《家庭法》通过后立即获得了其理论传统。无论解释这一概念的目的如何,其本质通常被归结为儿童的主观愿望,这必须由他的所有社会环境来考虑。正如对《RF家庭法典》规范和执法实践的文本分析所显示的那样,在没有对与之相关的概念- -合法利益、受法律保护的利益、有时被其取代- -进行理论分析的情况下,不一致地和同义地使用“儿童利益”概念的经验不断积累。没有这一点,法律和非法律在这一概念中如何联系的问题仍然是开放的,并吸引了不少学说的注意,尽管科学仍然发出需要更多“微调”的信号。本研究的目的是利用理论和方法工具从理论上识别这些信号,以便对家庭法学说中积极使用但在立法中非常不一致的“儿童利益”、“儿童合法利益”、“受保护的儿童权利和利益”等法律概念进行理论分类。方法:一般科学(辩证);私人科学的认知方法:形式法、逻辑法。结果:目前儿童科学知识的兴趣结构不明显。在许多方面,这种状态是由任意使用有趣术语的事实产生的。这部分的家庭法学与其说是创造新的科学知识,不如说是反映了现实状况。虽然儿童利益概念与法律事项的真正联系并不意味着它在家庭立法中使用的频率,而是与客观标准的联系。根据研究结果,作者得出以下结论。以法律为导向进一步研究儿童利益的可能途径之一,可能是改变现有的理论立场,吸引基于管制法和保护法原则的争论。在作者看来,这种做法将能够区分对儿童的重大利益是其合法利益的实施(合法利益)和利益,即在违反的情况下,恢复、恢复儿童的国家福利,这是由国际和国内法保证的,目的是为了使他的人格得到充分发展(法律保护的利益)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LEGAL MODELING AS A METHOD OF CIVIL RESEARCH ON THE METHODOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF THE THEORY OF SYSTEMIC ORGANIZATION OF INTERSECTORAL RELATIONS OF CIVIL LAW: TO THE ANNIVERSARY OF M.IU. CHELYSHEV PHILOSOPHICAL BATTLE AGAINST MORAL HAZARD: DO WE NEED LAW METHODOLOGY CHANGE FROM “ALL OR NOTHING PRINCIPLE” TO “PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY”? THE CONCEPT OF GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THE EU LEGISLATION: ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF METHODOLOGY OF THE CIVIL LAW RESEARCH ADDITIONAL CONCLUSION ON A DISSERTATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1