{"title":"Models of Solidarity in the EMU. The Impact of COVID-19 After Weiss","authors":"Ton VAN DEN BRINK, Matteo Gargantini","doi":"10.36633/ulr.663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Right in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, the German federal constitutional court (Bundesverfassungsgericht – FCC) issued a ruling that sent massive shockwaves through the continent. Not only did the Court question the legality of the European Central Bank’s bond buying program PSPP (Public Sector Purchase Program), but it also rejected the earlier decision by the CJEU in which this latter had found that program to respect EU law. The ruling is as such not directly concerned with Covid-19 measures, but it may have nonetheless important consequences thereon. In this contribution we will explore what those consequences may be. Apart from the direct effects on the ECB’s pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP), we zoom in on the ruling’s indirect consequences on the broader question of how to arrange solidarity in EMU. With regard to the latter, we contend that Weiss and the Covid-19 crises combined will test the basic models of solidarity the EMU relies upon: the models of individual fiscal responsibility, ECB based solidarity and the model of fiscal union. These models are assessed from economic, constitutional and democratic perspectives. © 2021. The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utrecht Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
欧洲货币联盟的团结模式。COVID-19在韦斯之后的影响
就在新冠肺炎大流行期间,德国联邦宪法法院(FCC)做出了一项裁决,在整个欧洲大陆引发了巨大冲击波。法院不仅质疑欧洲央行债券购买计划PSPP(公共部门购买计划)的合法性,而且还驳回了欧洲法院早些时候的决定,后者认为该计划符合欧盟法律。这项裁决本身与Covid-19措施没有直接关系,但它可能会对其产生重要影响。在这篇文章中,我们将探讨这些后果可能是什么。除了对欧洲央行流行病紧急购买计划(PEPP)的直接影响外,我们还关注了该裁决对如何在欧洲货币联盟内安排团结这一更广泛问题的间接影响。关于后者,我们认为韦斯和2019冠状病毒病危机的结合将考验欧洲货币联盟所依赖的基本团结模式:个人财政责任模式、基于欧洲央行的团结模式和财政联盟模式。这些模式从经济、宪法和民主的角度进行评估。©2021。作者(年代)。这是一篇根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议(CC-BY 4.0)发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。见http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。