{"title":"Le « troisième cinéma » au Québec : effervescence et lignes de faille","authors":"Vincent Bouchard, Marion Froger","doi":"10.3138/CJFS.24.2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Rencontres internationales pour un nouveau cinéma sought to create a federation at the international level, by way of ensuring \"an essential dialogue\" and to \"stimulate and make coherent [the] strategies\" of everyone in both the North and the South who adhered to \"Third Cinema,\" under the patronage of Fernando Solanas. But this \"community\" was in fact quite fragile, and brought to the fore the divergences in viewpoints, practices and objectives which had so animated the milieu of Quebec cinema. Beginning with Guy Hennebelle, the ideological strife of this period has already been widely discussed, but our objective in this article is to identify the fault-lines that affected the different ways of understanding \"audiovisual mediation\" in the face of the \"social change\" such mediation referred to. We insist particularly on the uncertainty that defines notions of \"public\" and \"collective,\" as well as the role played by the introduction of video in documentary circles. We also take account in this portrait of Quebec cinema's structural configuration, a milieu that allowed for the existence—despite these divergences—of a pluralist political cinema that was the period's most activist, inventive and inspiring.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CJFS.24.2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Abstract:The Rencontres internationales pour un nouveau cinéma sought to create a federation at the international level, by way of ensuring "an essential dialogue" and to "stimulate and make coherent [the] strategies" of everyone in both the North and the South who adhered to "Third Cinema," under the patronage of Fernando Solanas. But this "community" was in fact quite fragile, and brought to the fore the divergences in viewpoints, practices and objectives which had so animated the milieu of Quebec cinema. Beginning with Guy Hennebelle, the ideological strife of this period has already been widely discussed, but our objective in this article is to identify the fault-lines that affected the different ways of understanding "audiovisual mediation" in the face of the "social change" such mediation referred to. We insist particularly on the uncertainty that defines notions of "public" and "collective," as well as the role played by the introduction of video in documentary circles. We also take account in this portrait of Quebec cinema's structural configuration, a milieu that allowed for the existence—despite these divergences—of a pluralist political cinema that was the period's most activist, inventive and inspiring.
摘要:在Fernando Solanas的赞助下,Rencontres internationales pour un nouveau cin ma寻求在国际层面上建立一个联盟,通过确保“必要的对话”,并“刺激和制定连贯的策略”,使北方和南方的每个人都坚持“第三电影”。但这个“社区”实际上是相当脆弱的,并将观点、实践和目标的分歧暴露出来,而这些分歧曾使魁北克电影的环境充满活力。从盖伊·亨内贝尔(Guy Hennebelle)开始,这一时期的意识形态冲突已经被广泛讨论,但我们在本文中的目标是确定在面对这种调解所涉及的“社会变革”时,影响理解“视听调解”不同方式的断层线。我们特别强调定义“公共”和“集体”概念的不确定性,以及视频在纪录片圈中的引入所起的作用。我们还考虑了魁北克电影的结构配置,尽管存在这些分歧,但这种环境允许多元政治电影的存在,这是该时期最积极,最具创造性和最鼓舞人心的。