A Ten Year Cross Sectional Multicentre Study of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis, Trends in Management and an Analysis of Factors Predicting Mortality for Interventions in Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

IF 0.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of the Pancreas Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36648/1590-8577.22.1.11-20
J. Khan, Suryati Mokhtar, K. Raman, Harjit Singh, Leow Voon Meng, M. Subramaniam
{"title":"A Ten Year Cross Sectional Multicentre Study of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis, Trends in Management and an Analysis of Factors Predicting Mortality for Interventions in Infected Pancreatic Necrosis","authors":"J. Khan, Suryati Mokhtar, K. Raman, Harjit Singh, Leow Voon Meng, M. Subramaniam","doi":"10.36648/1590-8577.22.1.11-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To identify trends in management and analyse outcomes of patients undergoing interventions for infected pancreatic necrosis with specific reference to factors predictive of mortality. Method A cross sectional study of patients undergoing intervention for IPN between 2009-2018 were performed at two of the largest hepatopancreatobiliary centres in Malaysia. Final outcome measure of complete resolution was compared against mortality (D). Head to head comparison of percutaneous catheter drainage alone versus Videoscopic Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement was performed based on final predictive factor on mortality. Results A total number of 65 patients with IPN were identified. Data from 59/65 patients were analysed for final outcome of death (D) versus complete resolution. 6 patients were omitted due to incomplete data precluding proper analysis. Overall mortality rate was 25% (15/59 patients). 8 patients had no interventions performed but were included in the analysis. Percutaneous catheter drainage alone and Videoscopic Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement were the 2 commonest interventions performed (34/55). Multivariable analysis predictive of mortality included persistent organ failure requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR= 336.425, CI 95% =3.722-999.999 p value= 0.0113) and when PCD alone was employed compared to VARD (OR = 48.923, CI 95% = 1.888-999.999, p-value = 0.019). Conclusion Our present study shows that both persistent organ failure requiring ICU admission and Percutaneous Catheter Drainage alone when compared to a minimally invasive step up approach (in the form of Video assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement) are predictive factors of mortality in patients undergoing intervention for IPN. A step up approach is necessary to prevent mortality in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis requiring intervention while PCD without debridement results in significant mortality.","PeriodicalId":47280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pancreas","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1590-8577.22.1.11-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To identify trends in management and analyse outcomes of patients undergoing interventions for infected pancreatic necrosis with specific reference to factors predictive of mortality. Method A cross sectional study of patients undergoing intervention for IPN between 2009-2018 were performed at two of the largest hepatopancreatobiliary centres in Malaysia. Final outcome measure of complete resolution was compared against mortality (D). Head to head comparison of percutaneous catheter drainage alone versus Videoscopic Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement was performed based on final predictive factor on mortality. Results A total number of 65 patients with IPN were identified. Data from 59/65 patients were analysed for final outcome of death (D) versus complete resolution. 6 patients were omitted due to incomplete data precluding proper analysis. Overall mortality rate was 25% (15/59 patients). 8 patients had no interventions performed but were included in the analysis. Percutaneous catheter drainage alone and Videoscopic Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement were the 2 commonest interventions performed (34/55). Multivariable analysis predictive of mortality included persistent organ failure requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR= 336.425, CI 95% =3.722-999.999 p value= 0.0113) and when PCD alone was employed compared to VARD (OR = 48.923, CI 95% = 1.888-999.999, p-value = 0.019). Conclusion Our present study shows that both persistent organ failure requiring ICU admission and Percutaneous Catheter Drainage alone when compared to a minimally invasive step up approach (in the form of Video assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement) are predictive factors of mortality in patients undergoing intervention for IPN. A step up approach is necessary to prevent mortality in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis requiring intervention while PCD without debridement results in significant mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感染性胰腺坏死的10年横断面多中心研究,管理趋势和预测感染胰腺坏死干预死亡率的因素分析
目的探讨感染性胰腺坏死患者的治疗趋势,并分析其预后,具体参考预测死亡率的因素。方法在马来西亚两家最大的肝胆管中心对2009-2018年期间接受IPN干预的患者进行横断面研究。最终结局指标完全消退与死亡率进行比较(D)。根据死亡率的最终预测因素,对单独经皮导管引流与腹腔镜辅助腹膜后清创进行头对头比较。结果共确诊IPN患者65例。对59/65例患者的最终死亡结局(D)和完全缓解的数据进行分析。6例患者因资料不完整,无法进行适当的分析而被忽略。总死亡率为25%(15/59)。8例患者未进行干预,但被纳入分析。单独经皮导管引流和腹腔镜辅助腹膜后清创是两种最常见的干预措施(34/55)。多变量分析预测死亡率包括需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)的持续性器官衰竭(OR= 336.425, CI 95% =3.722-999.999 p值= 0.0113)和单独使用PCD与VARD比较(OR= 48.923, CI 95% = 1.888-999.999, p值= 0.019)。结论:我们目前的研究表明,与微创强化方法(以视频辅助腹膜后清创的形式)相比,需要ICU住院的持续性器官衰竭和单独经皮导管引流都是接受IPN干预患者死亡率的预测因素。对于需要干预的感染性胰腺坏死患者,有必要采取进一步的措施来预防死亡,而不进行清创的PCD会导致显著的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Pancreas
Journal of the Pancreas GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why do we need to be focused on pancreatic cancer Pediatric Pancreatic Lymphadenitis Tuberculosis Causing IVC Thrombosis in Syria: A Case Report Tumor-related paraneoplastic disorder creating a bogus synapse? A Case Report of Undifferentiated Pancreatic Carcinoma The Effect of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study at a London District General Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1