Ethical Considerations in Conducting Clinical Trials

Shahriar Mousavinejad, S. Bazmi, M. Rezaei-Tavirani, Ehsan Shamsi-Gooshki, Seyed Ali Enjoo, M. Kiani
{"title":"Ethical Considerations in Conducting Clinical Trials","authors":"Shahriar Mousavinejad, S. Bazmi, M. Rezaei-Tavirani, Ehsan Shamsi-Gooshki, Seyed Ali Enjoo, M. Kiani","doi":"10.32598/ijmtfm.v11i4.34863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical trials are the golden key in medical science research with human participants. They have always been considered interesting topics by researchers and scientists working in this field. However, the samples are “human participants,” so the research should be carefully conducted. Methods: In the present study, the published articles on the ethical challenges of conducting clinical trials were evaluated between 2010 and 2019 in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. The English search keywords were “clinical trial,” with at least one of the phrases of “ethical consideration” or “standard”. Results: In this article, we examined the ethical requirements and considerations in these research studies in four stages: research design and question, proposal review and approval, supervision and implementation, and publication of the results. We have examined them using relevant articles published between 2010 and 2019 and identified important and prominent issues or neglected ones. Conclusion: During this study, it was found that the “research design and question” stage was the most discussed and challenging stage, and the authors’ sensitivity about it has been more than the other three stages. On the other hand, the “results publishing” stage has been considered less sensitive with the least number of references in articles.","PeriodicalId":14168,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v11i4.34863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials are the golden key in medical science research with human participants. They have always been considered interesting topics by researchers and scientists working in this field. However, the samples are “human participants,” so the research should be carefully conducted. Methods: In the present study, the published articles on the ethical challenges of conducting clinical trials were evaluated between 2010 and 2019 in Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. The English search keywords were “clinical trial,” with at least one of the phrases of “ethical consideration” or “standard”. Results: In this article, we examined the ethical requirements and considerations in these research studies in four stages: research design and question, proposal review and approval, supervision and implementation, and publication of the results. We have examined them using relevant articles published between 2010 and 2019 and identified important and prominent issues or neglected ones. Conclusion: During this study, it was found that the “research design and question” stage was the most discussed and challenging stage, and the authors’ sensitivity about it has been more than the other three stages. On the other hand, the “results publishing” stage has been considered less sensitive with the least number of references in articles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进行临床试验的伦理考虑
背景:临床试验是人类参与医学研究的金钥匙。它们一直被这个领域的研究人员和科学家认为是有趣的话题。然而,这些样本是“人类参与者”,因此研究应该谨慎进行。方法:本研究对2010 - 2019年在谷歌Scholar、PubMed和Scopus上发表的关于开展临床试验的伦理挑战的文章进行评估。英文搜索关键词是“临床试验”,至少有一个短语是“伦理考虑”或“标准”。结果:在本文中,我们从研究设计与质疑、提案审核与批准、监督与实施、结果发表四个阶段考察了这些研究的伦理要求和考虑因素。我们利用2010年至2019年间发表的相关文章对它们进行了审查,并找出了重要和突出的问题或被忽视的问题。结论:在本次研究中,我们发现“研究设计和问题”阶段是讨论最多、最具挑战性的阶段,作者对此阶段的敏感性一直高于其他三个阶段。另一方面,“结果发表”阶段被认为不太敏感,因为文章中引用的文献数量最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Serum Klotho Level and its Related Factors Among Male Opioids Addicts With Normal Renal Function Compared to Healthy Male Non-smokers and Smokers in Tabriz, Iran Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Healthcare Workers in Tehran, Iran Investigation of NSD2 Protein Expression Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells After Treatment With Curcumin and Phthalates Delayed Death Due to Methanol Poisoning: An Autopsy Case Report The Sudden Death of a Pregnant Woman With Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Following a Legal Abortion: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1