The Changing Dynamics of Liberal International Order: Covid-19 and Its Global Implications

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Globalization Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.30884/jogs/2021.02.07
Mehmood Hussain
{"title":"The Changing Dynamics of Liberal International Order: Covid-19 and Its Global Implications","authors":"Mehmood Hussain","doi":"10.30884/jogs/2021.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The abrupt outburst of novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disrupts the global political, economic and social fabric, exposed the under-prepared global health system, interrupted the global economy, and global supply chains. The identification of virus and subsequent handling revealed the inherent inability of the liberal international order, its proclaimed liberal values and illiberal behavior, inability to reform institutional structure to accommodate a diverse pool of emerging powers and the tensions between its defenders and its challengers. These enduring problems are fully exposed during the pandemic era and require a reconfiguration in the post pandemic world. So, the paper sets it objective to investigate the impact of coronavirus on operations of liberal international order, and post-virus scenario. It addresses the following key questions: (a) To what extent liberalism and globalization facilitate the spread of infectious diseases and what are the consequences of pandemic for the stability of the system? (b) How has the pandemic changed the dynamics of current order and how it facilitates the challengers such as China? It is argued that liberal adherence to individual freedoms, market economy, and free flow of cross border movement is a source of prosperity for states and individuals; simultaneously the social behavior of individuals and states operating under the liberal system help pandemics to flourish. The crisscrossing of individuals with least restrictions put global health at greater risk, thereby increasing the demand for authoritarianism, propelled nationalism, protectionism and intensified the competition between the major powers. It is projected that the post-pandemic era will witness the greater transformation in the liberal international order. The Chinese authoritative approach to contain virus at home received greater applause, thus helping Beijing to extend its networks and expand space for its model. The mask and vaccine diplomacy by the PRC is a major challenge to the US-led liberal international order thereby reducing the US hegemonic capability and increasing Beijing's soft power projection.","PeriodicalId":36579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Globalization Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Globalization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/jogs/2021.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The abrupt outburst of novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disrupts the global political, economic and social fabric, exposed the under-prepared global health system, interrupted the global economy, and global supply chains. The identification of virus and subsequent handling revealed the inherent inability of the liberal international order, its proclaimed liberal values and illiberal behavior, inability to reform institutional structure to accommodate a diverse pool of emerging powers and the tensions between its defenders and its challengers. These enduring problems are fully exposed during the pandemic era and require a reconfiguration in the post pandemic world. So, the paper sets it objective to investigate the impact of coronavirus on operations of liberal international order, and post-virus scenario. It addresses the following key questions: (a) To what extent liberalism and globalization facilitate the spread of infectious diseases and what are the consequences of pandemic for the stability of the system? (b) How has the pandemic changed the dynamics of current order and how it facilitates the challengers such as China? It is argued that liberal adherence to individual freedoms, market economy, and free flow of cross border movement is a source of prosperity for states and individuals; simultaneously the social behavior of individuals and states operating under the liberal system help pandemics to flourish. The crisscrossing of individuals with least restrictions put global health at greater risk, thereby increasing the demand for authoritarianism, propelled nationalism, protectionism and intensified the competition between the major powers. It is projected that the post-pandemic era will witness the greater transformation in the liberal international order. The Chinese authoritative approach to contain virus at home received greater applause, thus helping Beijing to extend its networks and expand space for its model. The mask and vaccine diplomacy by the PRC is a major challenge to the US-led liberal international order thereby reducing the US hegemonic capability and increasing Beijing's soft power projection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由国际秩序的动态变化:新冠肺炎及其全球影响
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的突然爆发扰乱了全球政治、经济和社会结构,暴露了准备不足的全球卫生系统,中断了全球经济和全球供应链。病毒的识别和随后的处理表明,自由主义国际秩序固有的无能,其宣称的自由主义价值观和非自由主义行为,改革制度结构以适应各种新兴大国的无能,以及其捍卫者和挑战者之间的紧张关系。这些长期存在的问题在大流行时期充分暴露出来,需要在大流行后的世界进行重新配置。因此,本文的目的是研究冠状病毒对自由国际秩序运行的影响,以及后病毒情景。它涉及以下关键问题:(a)自由主义和全球化在多大程度上促进了传染病的传播,流行病对系统的稳定有什么后果?(b)大流行病如何改变当前秩序的动态,如何为中国等挑战者提供便利?有人认为,自由主义坚持个人自由、市场经济和跨境流动自由是国家和个人繁荣的源泉;同时,在自由体制下运作的个人和国家的社会行为助长了流行病的泛滥。受限制最少的个人的交叉往来使全球健康面临更大的风险,从而增加了对威权主义的需求,推动了民族主义和保护主义,加剧了大国之间的竞争。预计后大流行时代将见证自由国际秩序的更大变革。中国在国内采取的权威防控方法获得了更多的掌声,这有助于北京扩大其网络,扩大其模式的空间。中国的口罩和疫苗外交是对美国领导的自由主义国际秩序的重大挑战,从而削弱了美国的霸权能力,增加了北京的软实力投射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Globalization Studies
Journal of Globalization Studies Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Contradictions between Islamists in the Regional and Global Context: Wahhabis, Muslim Brothers, and al-Qaeda A Globalization Project in Practice? The EU's Cultural and Educational Activities in Azerbaijan in the Framework of the Eastern Partnership Programme Covid-19, Globalization and Strengthening Authoritarianism in the Middle East A Crude and Simple Calculus: Lessons for the CCP from COVID-19 The Global Crisis and the USA Search for Its New Identity: Trump's Attempt of Transition from Globalism to Isolationism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1