Human Menstrual Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Cells as New Human Feeder Layer System for Human Embryonic Stem Cells.

D. Silva Dos Santos, Vanessa Carvalho Coelho de Oliveira, K. Asensi, L. Vairo, A. B. Carvalho, A. C. Campos de Carvalho, R. Goldenberg
{"title":"Human Menstrual Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Cells as New Human Feeder Layer System for Human Embryonic Stem Cells.","authors":"D. Silva Dos Santos, Vanessa Carvalho Coelho de Oliveira, K. Asensi, L. Vairo, A. B. Carvalho, A. C. Campos de Carvalho, R. Goldenberg","doi":"10.3727/215517914X679265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in general require coculture with feeder layers in order to remain undifferentiated. However, the use of animal-derived feeder layers is incompatible with the clinical setting. The objective of this work was to investigate whether human menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal cells (MBMCs) can substitute mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) as a feeder layer for H9-hESCs. Both feeder cell types were isolated and cultured in DMEM F-12 and high glucose DMEM, respectively. After three passages, they were inactivated with mitomycin C. To test MBMC feeder layer capacity, hESCs were grown over MBMCs and MEFs under standard conditions. hESC growth, proliferation, survival, and maintenance of the undifferentiated state were evaluated. hESCs grown over MBMCs preserved their undifferentiated state presenting standard morphology, expressing alkaline phosphatase, transcription factors OCT3/4, SOX2, and NANOG by RT-PCR and SSEA-4 and OCT3/4 by immunofluorescence assays. It is noteworthy that none of the feeder cells expressed these proteins. The average colony size of the hESCs on MBMCs was higher when compared to MEFs (p < 0.05; mean ± SD, n = 3). Growth factor analysis revealed amplification of the transcripts for FGF-2, BMP4, TGF-β, VEGF, and PEDF by RT-PCR in MBMCs and MEFs before and after inactivation. Furthermore, similar embryoid body formation, size, and morphology were observed in both feeder layers. In addition, EBs expressed marker genes for the three germ layers cultured on both feeder cells. In conclusion, MBMCs are able to maintain hESCs in an undifferentiated state with comparable efficiency to MEFs. Therefore, MBMCs are a suitable alternative to animal-derived feeder layers for growing hESCs.","PeriodicalId":9780,"journal":{"name":"Cell medicine","volume":"7 1 1","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3727/215517914X679265","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/215517914X679265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in general require coculture with feeder layers in order to remain undifferentiated. However, the use of animal-derived feeder layers is incompatible with the clinical setting. The objective of this work was to investigate whether human menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal cells (MBMCs) can substitute mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) as a feeder layer for H9-hESCs. Both feeder cell types were isolated and cultured in DMEM F-12 and high glucose DMEM, respectively. After three passages, they were inactivated with mitomycin C. To test MBMC feeder layer capacity, hESCs were grown over MBMCs and MEFs under standard conditions. hESC growth, proliferation, survival, and maintenance of the undifferentiated state were evaluated. hESCs grown over MBMCs preserved their undifferentiated state presenting standard morphology, expressing alkaline phosphatase, transcription factors OCT3/4, SOX2, and NANOG by RT-PCR and SSEA-4 and OCT3/4 by immunofluorescence assays. It is noteworthy that none of the feeder cells expressed these proteins. The average colony size of the hESCs on MBMCs was higher when compared to MEFs (p < 0.05; mean ± SD, n = 3). Growth factor analysis revealed amplification of the transcripts for FGF-2, BMP4, TGF-β, VEGF, and PEDF by RT-PCR in MBMCs and MEFs before and after inactivation. Furthermore, similar embryoid body formation, size, and morphology were observed in both feeder layers. In addition, EBs expressed marker genes for the three germ layers cultured on both feeder cells. In conclusion, MBMCs are able to maintain hESCs in an undifferentiated state with comparable efficiency to MEFs. Therefore, MBMCs are a suitable alternative to animal-derived feeder layers for growing hESCs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人经血源性间充质细胞作为新的人胚胎干细胞喂养层体系。
人胚胎干细胞(hESCs)通常需要与饲养层共培养以保持未分化。然而,动物源性喂养层的使用与临床环境不相容。本研究的目的是探讨人经血源性间充质细胞(MBMCs)能否替代小鼠胚胎成纤维细胞(mef)作为H9-hESCs的喂养层。分别在DMEM F-12和高糖DMEM中分离培养两种饲养细胞。三次传代后,用丝裂霉素c灭活。为了测试MBMC饲养层容量,在标准条件下,hESCs在MBMC和mef上生长。评估hESC的生长、增殖、存活和维持未分化状态。在mbmc上生长的hESCs保持未分化状态,呈现标准形态,通过RT-PCR表达碱性磷酸酶、转录因子OCT3/4、SOX2和NANOG,通过免疫荧光检测表达SSEA-4和OCT3/4。值得注意的是,没有喂食细胞表达这些蛋白。mbmc上hESCs的平均菌落大小高于mef (p < 0.05;mean±SD, n = 3)。生长因子分析显示,在mbmc和mef失活前后,RT-PCR扩增了FGF-2、BMP4、TGF-β、VEGF和PEDF的转录本。此外,两饲喂层的胚状体形成、大小和形态相似。此外,EBs在两种饲养细胞上均表达了3种胚层的标记基因。综上所述,mbmc能够以与mef相当的效率将hESCs维持在未分化状态。因此,mbmc是替代动物源性饲养层生长hESCs的合适选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cell medicine
Cell medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Critical Shifts in Cerebral White Matter Lipid Profiles After Ischemic-Reperfusion Brain Injury in Fetal Sheep as Demonstrated by the Positive Ion Mode MALDI-Mass Spectrometry. Cryopreserved Alginate-Encapsulated Islets Can Restore Euglycemia in a Diabetic Animal Model Better than Cryopreserved Non-encapsulated Islets. MicroRNAs as Key Regulators of Ovarian Cancers. A Case of Acute Lymphocytic Leukaemia with t(3;13) and Central Nervous System Leukemia after Allogenic Cord Blood Transplantation. Unsurpassed Intrahepatic Islet Engraftment - the Quest for New Sites for Beta Cell Replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1