{"title":"“Army of Metaphors” in Scientific Discourse","authors":"M. Lanovyk, Z. Lanovyk","doi":"10.31861/pytlit2020.101.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article outlines the problem of the terminological potential of metaphor as the main figure of poetics, rhetoric, artistic and poetic thinking in general. The authors analyze numerous works about the nature and value of the metaphor; comprehend peculiarities of its use, forms and discourses of use, figurative potential of metaphorical thinking; at the same time, they emphasize on the mythological basis of such thinking (in particular, based on the works of O. Freudenberg, N. Frye, F. Nietzsche).\nThe main focus is on the metaphorical (figurative) nature of terminology in both the humanities and the exact sciences, as well as the problem of the interpenetration of terms, in particular, scientific terms, metaphors borrowed from human sciences.\nThe research confirms that at the present stage of development of all spheres of knowledge and science in general there is a cross-cutting penetration of metaphor at different levels: at the level of the names of theories; at the level of titles of scientific works – from ancient times to modern times; at the level of naming / defining phenomena and concepts, etc. Methodological foundation is based at the works of H. Ortega y Gasset, H. G. Gadamer and other philosophers of the twentieth century, who acknowledge the metaphor as a form of scientific thinking and cognition, at the same time see it as a marker of the spiritual space of science. The article outlines the Ukrainian experience of term-building in the context of a long-standing European tradition in combining elements of Western and Eastern approaches to the realization of reality and the transfer of knowledge.\nNumerous examples confirm the idea that metaphorology as a separate brunch in the 21st century is gaining momentum. Paying attention to metaphorical outview as an integral feature of human thinking (including scientific) offers new aspects and perspectives on the history of the sciences, opens the way to the convergence and interpenetration of scientific spheres, contains a number of axioms for human understanding of nature, history, world and mysteries of being.","PeriodicalId":32028,"journal":{"name":"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pitanna Literaturoznavstva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31861/pytlit2020.101.064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article outlines the problem of the terminological potential of metaphor as the main figure of poetics, rhetoric, artistic and poetic thinking in general. The authors analyze numerous works about the nature and value of the metaphor; comprehend peculiarities of its use, forms and discourses of use, figurative potential of metaphorical thinking; at the same time, they emphasize on the mythological basis of such thinking (in particular, based on the works of O. Freudenberg, N. Frye, F. Nietzsche).
The main focus is on the metaphorical (figurative) nature of terminology in both the humanities and the exact sciences, as well as the problem of the interpenetration of terms, in particular, scientific terms, metaphors borrowed from human sciences.
The research confirms that at the present stage of development of all spheres of knowledge and science in general there is a cross-cutting penetration of metaphor at different levels: at the level of the names of theories; at the level of titles of scientific works – from ancient times to modern times; at the level of naming / defining phenomena and concepts, etc. Methodological foundation is based at the works of H. Ortega y Gasset, H. G. Gadamer and other philosophers of the twentieth century, who acknowledge the metaphor as a form of scientific thinking and cognition, at the same time see it as a marker of the spiritual space of science. The article outlines the Ukrainian experience of term-building in the context of a long-standing European tradition in combining elements of Western and Eastern approaches to the realization of reality and the transfer of knowledge.
Numerous examples confirm the idea that metaphorology as a separate brunch in the 21st century is gaining momentum. Paying attention to metaphorical outview as an integral feature of human thinking (including scientific) offers new aspects and perspectives on the history of the sciences, opens the way to the convergence and interpenetration of scientific spheres, contains a number of axioms for human understanding of nature, history, world and mysteries of being.
本文概述了隐喻作为诗学、修辞学、艺术和诗歌思维的主要形象的术语潜力问题。作者分析了许多关于隐喻的性质和价值的著作;理解其用法的特点、用法的形式和语篇、隐喻思维的形象化潜力;同时,他们强调这种思维的神话基础(特别是基于O. Freudenberg, N. Frye, F.尼采的作品)。主要焦点是人文科学和精确科学术语的隐喻(比喻)性质,以及术语的相互渗透问题,特别是科学术语,从人文科学中借用的隐喻。研究证实,在目前所有知识和科学领域的发展阶段,隐喻在不同层面上都有交叉渗透:在理论名称层面;在科学著作的标题层面——从古至今;在命名/定义现象和概念等层面。方法论的基础是建立在H. Ortega y Gasset, H. G. Gadamer和其他20世纪哲学家的作品上,他们承认隐喻是一种科学思维和认知的形式,同时将其视为科学精神空间的标志。文章概述了乌克兰在长期的欧洲传统背景下建立术语的经验,将西方和东方的方法结合起来,以实现现实和知识转移。在21世纪,隐喻作为一种独立的早午餐,其势头正愈演愈烈。将隐喻观作为人类思维(包括科学思维)的一个整体特征予以关注,为科学史提供了新的方面和视角,为科学领域的融合和相互渗透开辟了道路,为人类理解自然、历史、世界和存在的奥秘提供了许多公理。