Lockdown Strategies Adopted by the Zimbabwean Government to Avert the Spread of COVID-19: Media Responses, Challenges and Opportunities

Q3 Social Sciences African Renaissance Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.31920/2516-5305/2020/17n3a13
H. Zirima, V. Nyambuya, K. Shumba
{"title":"Lockdown Strategies Adopted by the Zimbabwean Government to Avert the Spread of COVID-19: Media Responses, Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"H. Zirima, V. Nyambuya, K. Shumba","doi":"10.31920/2516-5305/2020/17n3a13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted most countries globally, including Zimbabwe The government of Zimbabwe instituted several strategies to contain the spread of COVID-19 This study explored the challenges and opportunities that emanated from the strategies that were adopted It focused on how the generality of Zimbabwean citizens responded to the government's COVID-19 response and the opportunities arising from the various interventions We adopted a qualitative approach to analyse thirty-four (n=34) tweets responding to government strategies to contain the spread of COVID-19 The study found a lack of confidence in the mechanisms devised by the government, considering the socio-economic context of hyper-inflation and a severely incapacitated public health system The dominant sentiment pointed to a lax in the response by the government, jeorpardising chances of containing the pandemic Most people argued that more resources should have been allocated towards fighting COVID-19 The radical decision to declare a 21-day lockdown was received with mixed feelings Most people criticised the lockdown for failing to consider the status-quo where majority of Zimbabweans survive from hand to mouth due to the informal nature of the economy However, some people acknowledged the merit of putting the country in lockdown mode The tweets re-iterated the need to forge strong and well-coordinated public-private partnerships to generate the much-needed resources to fight COVID-19, given that substantial financial and material support was availed to the government through individuals and the private sector Future studies should explore socio-economic implications of the lockdown on Zimbabweans © 2020 Adonis and Abbey Publishers Ltd All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":37170,"journal":{"name":"African Renaissance","volume":"17 1","pages":"259-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2516-5305/2020/17n3a13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted most countries globally, including Zimbabwe The government of Zimbabwe instituted several strategies to contain the spread of COVID-19 This study explored the challenges and opportunities that emanated from the strategies that were adopted It focused on how the generality of Zimbabwean citizens responded to the government's COVID-19 response and the opportunities arising from the various interventions We adopted a qualitative approach to analyse thirty-four (n=34) tweets responding to government strategies to contain the spread of COVID-19 The study found a lack of confidence in the mechanisms devised by the government, considering the socio-economic context of hyper-inflation and a severely incapacitated public health system The dominant sentiment pointed to a lax in the response by the government, jeorpardising chances of containing the pandemic Most people argued that more resources should have been allocated towards fighting COVID-19 The radical decision to declare a 21-day lockdown was received with mixed feelings Most people criticised the lockdown for failing to consider the status-quo where majority of Zimbabweans survive from hand to mouth due to the informal nature of the economy However, some people acknowledged the merit of putting the country in lockdown mode The tweets re-iterated the need to forge strong and well-coordinated public-private partnerships to generate the much-needed resources to fight COVID-19, given that substantial financial and material support was availed to the government through individuals and the private sector Future studies should explore socio-economic implications of the lockdown on Zimbabweans © 2020 Adonis and Abbey Publishers Ltd All rights reserved
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津巴布韦政府为避免COVID-19传播采取的封锁战略:媒体应对、挑战和机遇
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行严重影响了全球大多数国家,包括津巴布韦在内,津巴布韦政府制定了几项遏制COVID-19传播的战略。本研究探讨了所采取的战略所带来的挑战和机遇。研究重点是津巴布韦公民的总体情况如何应对政府的COVID-19应对措施,以及各种干预措施所带来的机遇。我们采用定性方法分析了34条(n=34)回应政府遏制战略的推文该研究发现,考虑到恶性通货膨胀的社会经济背景和公共卫生系统严重失灵,人们对政府制定的机制缺乏信心。大多数人认为,应该为抗击COVID-19分配更多的资源。宣布21天封锁的激进决定引起了复杂的情绪。大多数人批评封锁没有考虑到现状,由于经济的非正式性质,大多数津巴布韦人仅能糊口。一些人承认将国家置于封锁模式的好处,推特重申需要建立强有力和协调良好的公私伙伴关系,以产生抗击COVID-19所需的资源,鉴于个人和私营部门向政府提供了大量财政和物质支持,未来的研究应探讨封锁对津巴布韦人的社会经济影响©2020 Adonis and Abbey Publishers Ltd版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Renaissance
African Renaissance Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disaster Management Plan and the Integrated Development Planning Process of Municipalities in South Africa Sustainable Adaptation Measures to climate change: a need of a balancing act between developed and developing countries Impact of Climate Change on Food Security and Water Supply in South Africa : Reports from Local Authorities Globalization, Climate Change and Uneven Development in Africa: The Zimbabwe Farmers Experience Climate Change and Human Security in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1